| Literature DB >> 27335268 |
Alexander S Shorokhov1, Kirill I Okhlopkov1, Jörg Reinhold2, Christian Helgert2, Maxim R Shcherbakov1, Thomas Pertsch2, Andrey A Fedyanin1.
Abstract
Nonlinear photonic nanostructures that allow efficient all-optical switching are considered to be a prospective platform for novel building blocks in photonics. We performed time-resolved measurements of the photoinduced transient third-order nonlinear optical response of a fishnet metamaterial. The mutual influence of two non-collinear pulses exciting the magnetic resonance of the metamaterial was probed by detecting the third-harmonic radiation as a function of the time delay between pulses. Subpicosecond-scale dynamics of the metamaterial's χ((3)) was observed; the all-optical χ((3)) modulation depth was found to be approximately 70% at a pump fluence of only 20 μJ/cm(2).Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27335268 PMCID: PMC4917860 DOI: 10.1038/srep28440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of the studied fishnet metamaterial. (b) Scanning electron micrograph of the sample. (c) Absorption spectrum of the sample acquired at 10° incidence. The dashed line indicates the carrier wavelength of the pump laser. (d) Schematic illustration of the experimental setup: HWP represents a half-wave plate, GT represents a laser-grade Glan-Taylor polarizer, the beams were chopped at frequencies of f1 and f2, BG indicates a 4 mm thick Schott BG39 filter glass, PMT represents a photomultiplier tube, FCU represents a frequency-conditioning unit, and A represents an iris aperture. (e) Calculated at 1550 nm E-field distribution plotted in the horizontal plane sliced through the center of the MgO slab. White dashed line represents the borders of the hole perforated through the structure. (f) Calculated at 1550 nm E-field distribution superimposed with the normalized field vectors plotted in the vertical plane sliced through the center of the unit cell depicted in (e). For both (e,f), scale bars denote 100 nm.
Figure 2Filled black dots: THG of the sample as a function of the time delay between pulses, as detected at the f1 + f2 frequency of the chopper. Blue solid curve and dots: THG of the silica substrate as a function of the time delay between pulses, as detected at f1 + f2. Inset: THG signal of the sample measured at f1 when the second beam was blocked as a function of the power of the first beam. The solid red line represents a fit to the power function f(x) = ax, indicating a power of b = 2.9 ± 0.1.
Figure 3The relative change in the effective third-order nonlinear susceptibility of the fishnet metamaterial as a function of the time delay between the pump and probe pulses (black dots) and its fit to Eq. (7) (red curve). The gray dashed area represents the normalized cross-correlation function of the laser pulses. Inset: illustration of the photoinduced relaxation processes occurring in the structure.