Literature DB >> 27334798

Excited state decay of cyclometalated polypyridine ruthenium complexes: insight from theory and experiment.

Christoph Kreitner1, Katja Heinze.   

Abstract

Deactivation pathways of the triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer ((3)MLCT) excited state of cyclometalated polypyridine ruthenium complexes with [RuN5C](+) coordination are discussed on the basis of the available experimental data and a series of density functional theory calculations. Three different complex classes are considered, namely with [Ru(N^N)2(N^C)](+), [Ru(N^N^N)(N^C^N)](+) and [Ru(N^N^N)(N^N^C)](+) coordination modes. Excited state deactivation in these complex types proceeds via five distinct decay channels. Vibronic coupling of the (3)MLCT state to high-energy oscillators of the singlet ground state ((1)GS) allows tunneling to the ground state followed by vibrational relaxation (path A). A ligand field excited state ((3)MC) is thermally accessible via a (3)MLCT →(3)MC transition state with the (3)MC state being strongly coupled to the (1)GS surface via a low-energy minimum energy crossing point (path B). Furthermore, a (3)MLCT →(1)GS surface crossing point directly couples the triplet and singlet potential energy surfaces (path C). Charge transfer states either with higher singlet character or with different orbital parentage and intrinsic symmetry restrictions are thermally populated which promote non-radiative decay via tunneling to the (1)GS state (path D). Finally, the excited state can decay via phosphorescence (path E). The dominant deactivation pathways differ for the three individual complex classes. The implications of these findings for isoelectronic iridium(iii) or iron(ii) complexes are discussed. Ultimately, strategies for optimizing the emission efficiencies of cyclometalated polypyridine complexes of d(6)-metal ions, especially Ru(II), are suggested.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334798     DOI: 10.1039/c6dt01989g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dalton Trans        ISSN: 1477-9226            Impact factor:   4.390


  5 in total

1.  Cyclometalated Ruthenium(II) Complexes Derived from α-Oligothiophenes as Highly Selective Cytotoxic or Photocytotoxic Agents.

Authors:  Goutam Ghosh; Katsuya L Colón; Anderson Fuller; Tariq Sainuddin; Evan Bradner; Julia McCain; Susan M A Monro; Huimin Yin; Marc W Hetu; Colin G Cameron; Sherri A McFarland
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Exploring the potential of iron to replace ruthenium in photosensitizers: a computational study.

Authors:  Srikanth Malladi; Soujanya Yarasi; G Narahari Sastry
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Towards Water Soluble Mitochondria-Targeting Theranostic Osmium(II) Triazole-Based Complexes.

Authors:  Salem A E Omar; Paul A Scattergood; Luke K McKenzie; Helen E Bryant; Julia A Weinstein; Paul I P Elliott
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Photochemical Resolution of a Thermally Inert Cyclometalated Ru(phbpy)(N-N)(Sulfoxide)+ Complex.

Authors:  Lucien N Lameijer; Corjan van de Griend; Samantha L Hopkins; Anne-Geert Volbeda; Sven H C Askes; Maxime A Siegler; Sylvestre Bonnet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Selective Preparation of a Heteroleptic Cyclometallated Ruthenium Complex Capable of Undergoing Photosubstitution of a Bidentate Ligand.

Authors:  Jordi-Amat Cuello-Garibo; Catriona C James; Maxime A Siegler; Samantha L Hopkins; Sylvestre Bonnet
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.