Literature DB >> 27334605

Evaluation of physical properties and dose equivalency of generic versus branded latanoprost formulations.

Dewang Angmo1, Meenakshi Wadhwani1, Thirumurthy Velpandian2, Ankita Kotnal2, Ramanjit Sihota1, Tanuj Dada3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the pharmaceutical characteristics of various marketed generic formulations of prostaglandin analogue latanoprost in the Indian market. Three generics of latanoprost and one branded (Xalatan) formulation (five vials each) were obtained from authorized agents from the respective commercial sourcing having the same batch number. These formulations were coded, and the labels were removed. At a standardized room temperature of 25 °C, the concentration, osmolarity, drop size, pH, and total drops per vial were determined for Xalatan and all the generics of latanoprost. The concentration of various brands varied between 50.49 ± 0.36 and 58.90 ± 0.52 µg/ml as compared to the standard labeled concentration of 50 µg/ml on the latanoprost vials. The concentration of drugs in individual drop varied from 1.30 ± 0.05 to 1.78 ± 0.04 µg/drop. The volume of drug formulation per bottle varied from 2.4 ± 0.12 to 2.6 ± 0.09 ml/bottle. The number of drops per bottle varied from minimum of 88.60 ± 0.10 drops to maximum of 102.0 ± 4.3 drops across all the formulations, while the drop size varied from 25.72 ± 2.70 to 29.97 ± 1.38 µl. The osmolarity of 2/4 drugs was within 300 mOs M (±10 %). The specific gravity varied between 0.98 ± 0.01 and 1.007 ± 0.01, while pH was between 7.05 ± 0.004 and 7.13 ± 0.005. Two of the generic brands were outside the United States pharmacopoeia limits (±10%) for ophthalmic formulation, with concentration exceeding the limits by 3 % (p = 0.151) and 8 % (p = 0.008), respectively. This pilot study highlights that there are significant variations in the drug concentrations and physical properties of generic latanoprost formulations. Although none of the brands had concentrations below the recommended level, two of the brands had concentrations exceeding the limits by 3 and 8 %, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Branded drugs; Generic drugs; Latanoprost; Prostaglandin analogues

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334605     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0280-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  19 in total

1.  Historical overview of generic medication policy.

Authors:  F J Ascione; D M Kirking; C A Gaither; L S Welage
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Side effects associated with prostaglandin analog therapy.

Authors:  Albert Alm; Ian Grierson; M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 3.  Ophthalmic generic drug approval process: implications for efficacy and safety.

Authors:  L B Cantor
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Generic prednisolone suspension substitution.

Authors:  R G Fiscella; M Jensen; G Van Dyck
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05

5.  A comparison of active ingredients and preservatives between brand name and generic topical glaucoma medications using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Malik Y Kahook; Robert D Fechtner; L Jay Katz; Robert J Noecker; David A Ammar
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Thermal stability of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost under simulated daily use.

Authors:  Thomas V Johnson; Preeya K Gupta; Daljit K Vudathala; Ian A Blair; Angelo P Tanna
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Arun Narayanaswamy; Aditya Neog; M Baskaran; Ronnie George; Vijaya Lingam; Chetan Desai; Viraj Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Stability of latanoprost in generic formulations using controlled degradation and patient usage simulation studies.

Authors:  Thirumurthy Velpandian; Ankita Kotnala; Nabanita Halder; Alok Kumar Ravi; Vikneshwari Archunan; Ramanjit Sihota
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.424

9.  pH and drug ionization affects ocular pressure lowering of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Authors:  W F Brechue; T H Maren
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: a patient-use study.

Authors:  Mauricio D Paolera; Niro Kasahara; Cristiano C Umbelino; John G Walt
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  An Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of Preservative-Free 0.005% (w/v) Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions, and the Impact on In Vitro Human Conjunctival Goblet Cell Survival.

Authors:  Josefine C Freiberg; Anne Hedengran; Steffen Heegaard; Goran Petrovski; Jette Jacobsen; Barbara Cvenkel; Miriam Kolko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Generic Latanoprost Versus Branded Prostaglandin Analogs for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Diana H Kim; Victoria M Addis; Wei Pan; Brian L VanderBeek
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 3.  Generics versus brand-named drugs for glaucoma: the debate continues.

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Deepika Dhingra
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

4.  Impact of benzalkonium chloride-preserved and preservative-free latanoprost eye drops on cultured human conjunctival goblet cells upon acute exposure and differences in physicochemical properties of the eye drops.

Authors:  Olivia Müllertz; Anne Hedengran; Zaynab Ahmad Mouhammad; Josefine Freiberg; Richárd Nagymihály; Jette Jacobsen; Susan Weng Larsen; Jeffrey Bair; Tor P Utheim; Darlene A Dartt; Steffen Heegaard; Goran Petrovski; Miriam Kolko
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.