Literature DB >> 27334309

Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.

Nathan J Bennett1,2,3, Robin Roth4, Sarah C Klain1, Kai M A Chan1, Douglas A Clark5, Georgina Cullman6, Graham Epstein7, Michael Paul Nelson8, Richard Stedman9, Tara L Teel10, Rebecca E W Thomas11, Carina Wyborn12, Deborah Curran13, Alison Greenberg3, John Sandlos14, Diogo Veríssimo15,16.   

Abstract

Despite broad recognition of the value of social sciences and increasingly vocal calls for better engagement with the human element of conservation, the conservation social sciences remain misunderstood and underutilized in practice. The conservation social sciences can provide unique and important contributions to society's understanding of the relationships between humans and nature and to improving conservation practice and outcomes. There are 4 barriers-ideological, institutional, knowledge, and capacity-to meaningful integration of the social sciences into conservation. We provide practical guidance on overcoming these barriers to mainstream the social sciences in conservation science, practice, and policy. Broadly, we recommend fostering knowledge on the scope and contributions of the social sciences to conservation, including social scientists from the inception of interdisciplinary research projects, incorporating social science research and insights during all stages of conservation planning and implementation, building social science capacity at all scales in conservation organizations and agencies, and promoting engagement with the social sciences in and through global conservation policy-influencing organizations. Conservation social scientists, too, need to be willing to engage with natural science knowledge and to communicate insights and recommendations clearly. We urge the conservation community to move beyond superficial engagement with the conservation social sciences. A more inclusive and integrative conservation science-one that includes the natural and social sciences-will enable more ecologically effective and socially just conservation. Better collaboration among social scientists, natural scientists, practitioners, and policy makers will facilitate a renewed and more robust conservation. Mainstreaming the conservation social sciences will facilitate the uptake of the full range of insights and contributions from these fields into conservation policy and practice.
© 2016 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biología de la conservación; ciencia de la conservación; ciencia social ambiental; ciencia social de la conservación; conservation biology; conservation planning; conservation science; conservation social science; dimensiones humanas; environmental social science; human dimensions; manejo de recursos naturales; natural resource management; planificación de la conservación; sistemas socio-ecológicos; social-ecological systems

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334309     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  17 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science.

Authors:  Kristian Steensen Nielsen; Theresa M Marteau; Jan M Bauer; Richard B Bradbury; Steven Broad; Gayle Burgess; Mark Burgman; Hilary Byerly; Susan Clayton; Dulce Espelosin; Paul J Ferraro; Brendan Fisher; Emma E Garnett; Julia P G Jones; Mark Otieno; Stephen Polasky; Taylor H Ricketts; Rosie Trevelyan; Sander van der Linden; Diogo Veríssimo; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  The features and processes underpinning high-quality data generation in participatory research and engagement activities.

Authors:  Phoebe R Maund; Jacob W Bentley; Gail E Austen; Katherine N Irvine; Robert Fish; Martin Dallimer; Zoe G Davies
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 8.335

3.  News media and fisheries-independent data reveal hidden impacts of hurricanes.

Authors:  Stephen F Jane; Kayla M Smith; Dana Baker; Allison Saroni; Emma Cutler; Paul Carvalho
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.943

4.  Understanding conservation conflicts associated with rodent outbreaks in farmland areas.

Authors:  Valentin Lauret; Miguel Delibes-Mateos; François Mougeot; Beatriz Arroyo-Lopez
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alice B M Vadrot; Aleksandar Rankovic; Renaud Lapeyre; Pierre-Marie Aubert; Yann Laurans
Journal:  Innovation (Abingdon)       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Four priorities for new links between conservation science and accounting research.

Authors:  Clément Feger; Laurent Mermet; Bhaskar Vira; Prue F E Addison; Richard Barker; Frank Birkin; John Burns; Stuart Cooper; Denis Couvet; Thomas Cuckston; Gretchen C Daily; Colin Dey; Louise Gallagher; Rosemary Hails; Stephen Jollands; Georgina Mace; Emily Mckenzie; Markus Milne; Paolo Quattrone; Alexandre Rambaud; Shona Russell; Marta Santamaria; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Conservation publications and their provisions to protect research participants.

Authors:  Harriet Ibbett; Stephanie Brittain
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Evidence-based conservation education in Mexican communities: Connecting arts and science.

Authors:  Montserrat Franquesa-Soler; Lucía Jorge-Sales; John F Aristizabal; Patricia Moreno-Casasola; Juan Carlos Serio-Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Working from the Inside Out: Fostering Intrinsic Motivation and Expanding Our Criteria for Conservation Success.

Authors:  Claire Cardinal; Miranda A Strubel; Aimee S Oxley
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Fundamental insights on when social network data are most critical for conservation planning.

Authors:  Jonathan R Rhodes; Angela M Guerrero; Örjan Bodin; Iadine Chadès
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 6.560

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.