Literature DB >> 27334234

Financial incentives increase fruit and vegetable intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: a randomized controlled trial of the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot.

Lauren Ew Olsho1, Jacob A Klerman2, Parke E Wilde3, Susan Bartlett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: US fruit and vegetable (FV) intake remains below recommendations, particularly for low-income populations. Evidence on effectiveness of rebates in addressing this shortfall is limited.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP), which offered rebates to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants for purchasing targeted FVs (TFVs).
DESIGN: As part of a randomized controlled trial in Hampden County, Massachusetts, 7500 randomly selected SNAP households received a 30% rebate on TFVs purchased with SNAP benefits. The remaining 47,595 SNAP households in the county received usual benefits. Adults in 5076 HIP and non-HIP households were randomly sampled for telephone surveys, including 24-h dietary recall interviews. Surveys were conducted at baseline (1-3 mo before implementation) and in 2 follow-up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo after implementation). 2784 adults (1388 HIP, 1396 non-HIP) completed baseline interviews; data were analyzed for 2009 adults (72%) who also completed ≥1 follow-up interview.
RESULTS: Regression-adjusted mean TFV intake at follow-up was 0.24 cup-equivalents/d (95% CI: 0.13, 0.34 cup-equivalents/d) higher among HIP participants. Across all fruit and vegetables (AFVs), regression-adjusted mean intake was 0.32 cup-equivalents/d (95% CI: 0.17, 0.48 cup-equivalents/d) higher among HIP participants. The AFV-TFV difference was explained by greater intake of 100% fruit juice (0.10 cup-equivalents/d; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.17 cup-equivalents/d); juice purchases did not earn the HIP rebate. Refined grain intake was 0.43 ounce-equivalents/d lower (95% CI: -0.69, -0.16 ounce-equivalents/d) among HIP participants, possibly indicating substitution effects. Increased AFV intake and decreased refined grain intake contributed to higher Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores among HIP participants (4.7 points; 95% CI: 2.4, 7.1 points).
CONCLUSIONS: The HIP significantly increased FV intake among SNAP participants, closing ∼20% of the gap relative to recommendations and increasing dietary quality. More research on mechanisms of action is warranted. The HIP trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02651064.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthy Incentives Pilot; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; financial incentives; fruits and vegetables; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334234     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  57 in total

1.  Cost Effectiveness of Subsidizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchases Through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Authors:  Sung Eun Choi; Hilary Seligman; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  A Qualitative Evaluation of Double Up Food Bucks Farmers' Market Incentive Program Access.

Authors:  Jennifer A Garner; Casey Coombs; Mateja R Savoie-Roskos; Carrie Durward; Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Nutrient density and affordability of foods in Brazil by food group and degree of processing.

Authors:  Kennya Beatriz Siqueira; Cristiano Av Borges; Mirella L Binoti; Amanda F Pilati; Paulo Hf da Silva; Shilpi Gupta; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Legal Feasibility and Implementation of Federal Strategies for a National Retail-Based Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pomeranz; Yue Huang; Dariush Mozaffarian; Renata Micha
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Environmental Interventions to Reduce the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Abridged Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva A Rehfuess
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  Food insecurity and obesity: research gaps, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Alison G M Brown; Layla E Esposito; Rachel A Fisher; Holly L Nicastro; Derrick C Tabor; Jenelle R Walker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Facilitators and Barriers to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Incentive Use: Findings From a Clinic Intervention for Low-Income Patients.

Authors:  Alicia J Cohen; Kelsie E Oatmen; Michele Heisler; Oran B Hesterman; Ellen C Murphy; Suzanna M Zick; Caroline R Richardson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Food security moderates relationship between perceived food environment and diet quality among adults in communities with low access to healthy food retail.

Authors:  Nisha R Gupta; Darcy A Freedman
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Trends in cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving monthly nutrition assistance: results from a prospective study.

Authors:  Sruthi Valluri; Susan M Mason; Hikaru H Peterson; Simone A French; Lisa J Harnack
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.