Literature DB >> 27334054

Global variations in ecosystem-scale isohydricity.

Alexandra G Konings1,2, Pierre Gentine1,3.   

Abstract

Droughts are expected to become more frequent and more intense under climate change. Plant mortality rates and biomass declines in response to drought depend on stomatal and xylem flow regulation. Plants operate on a continuum of xylem and stomatal regulation strategies from very isohydric (strict regulation) to very anisohydric. Coexisting species may display a variety of isohydricity behaviors. As such, it can be difficult to predict how to model the degree of isohydricity at the ecosystem scale by aggregating studies of individual species. This is nonetheless essential for accurate prediction of ecosystem drought resilience. In this study, we define a metric for the degree of isohydricity at the ecosystem scale in analogy with a recent metric introduced at the species level. Using data from the AMSR-E satellite, this metric is evaluated globally based on diurnal variations in microwave vegetation optical depth (VOD), which is directly related to leaf water potential. Areas with low annual mean radiation are found to be more anisohydric. Except for evergreen broadleaf forests in the tropics, which are very isohydric, and croplands, which are very anisohydric, land cover type is a poor predictor of ecosystem isohydricity, in accordance with previous species-scale observations. It is therefore also a poor basis for parameterizing water stress response in land-surface models. For taller ecosystems, canopy height is correlated with higher isohydricity (so that rainforests are mostly isohydric). Highly anisohydric areas show either high or low underlying water use efficiency. In seasonally dry locations, most ecosystems display a more isohydric response (increased stomatal regulation) during the dry season. In several seasonally dry tropical forests, this trend is reversed, as dry-season leaf-out appears to coincide with a shift toward more anisohydric strategies. The metric developed in this study allows for detailed investigations of spatial and temporal variations in plant water behavior.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diurnal cycle; drought stress; isohydricity; leaf water potential; stomatal closure; vegetation height; vegetation optical depth; water use efficiency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334054     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  12 in total

1.  Physiological response of Swiss ecosystems to 2018 drought across plant types and elevation.

Authors:  Mana Gharun; Lukas Hörtnagl; Eugénie Paul-Limoges; Shiva Ghiasi; Iris Feigenwinter; Susanne Burri; Kristiina Marquardt; Sophia Etzold; Roman Zweifel; Werner Eugster; Nina Buchmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sensitivity of gross primary productivity to climatic drivers during the summer drought of 2018 in Europe.

Authors:  Zheng Fu; Philippe Ciais; Ana Bastos; Paul C Stoy; Hui Yang; Julia K Green; Bingxue Wang; Kailiang Yu; Yuanyuan Huang; Alexander Knohl; Ladislav Šigut; Mana Gharun; Matthias Cuntz; Nicola Arriga; Marilyn Roland; Matthias Peichl; Mirco Migliavacca; Edoardo Cremonese; Andrej Varlagin; Christian Brümmer; Louis Gourlez de la Motte; Silvano Fares; Nina Buchmann; Tarek S El-Madany; Andrea Pitacco; Nadia Vendrame; Zhaolei Li; Caroline Vincke; Enzo Magliulo; Franziska Koebsch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Characterizing the Response of Vegetation Cover to Water Limitation in Africa Using Geostationary Satellites.

Authors:  Çağlar Küçük; Sujan Koirala; Nuno Carvalhais; Diego G Miralles; Markus Reichstein; Martin Jung
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.469

4.  Amazon rainforest photosynthesis increases in response to atmospheric dryness.

Authors:  J K Green; J Berry; P Ciais; Y Zhang; P Gentine
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology.

Authors:  Matthew F McCabe; Matthew Rodell; Douglas E Alsdorf; Diego G Miralles; Remko Uijlenhoet; Wolfgang Wagner; Arko Lucieer; Rasmus Houborg; Niko E C Verhoest; Trenton E Franz; Jiancheng Shi; Huilin Gao; Eric F Wood
Journal:  Hydrol Earth Syst Sci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.617

6.  Large differences in leaf cuticle conductance and its temperature response among 24 tropical tree species from across a rainfall gradient.

Authors:  Martijn Slot; Tantawat Nardwattanawong; Georgia G Hernández; Amauri Bueno; Markus Riederer; Klaus Winter
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 10.323

7.  A Meta-Overview and Bibliometric Analysis of Resilience in Spatial Planning - the Relevance of Place-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Gabriela Carmen Pascariu; Alexandru Banica; Peter Nijkamp
Journal:  Appl Spat Anal Policy       Date:  2022-04-23

8.  A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000-2016.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Xiangming Xiao; Xiaocui Wu; Sha Zhou; Geli Zhang; Yuanwei Qin; Jinwei Dong
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.444

Review 9.  Trait-based representation of hydrological functional properties of plants in weather and ecosystem models.

Authors:  Ashley M Matheny; Golnazalsadat Mirfenderesgi; Gil Bohrer
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2016-11-24

10.  Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  A Bastos; P Ciais; P Friedlingstein; S Sitch; J Pongratz; L Fan; J P Wigneron; U Weber; M Reichstein; Z Fu; P Anthoni; A Arneth; V Haverd; A K Jain; E Joetzjer; J Knauer; S Lienert; T Loughran; P C McGuire; H Tian; N Viovy; S Zaehle
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.