M Al Bahri1, R Sbiaa1. 1. Department of Physics, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, PC 123, Muscat, Oman.
Abstract
Spintronic devices currently rely on magnetic switching or controlled motion of domain walls (DWs) by an external magnetic field or a spin-polarized current. Controlling the position of DW is essential for defining the state/information in a magnetic memory. During the process of nanowire fabrication, creating an off-set of two parts of the device could help to pin DW at a precise position. Micromagnetic simulation conducted on in-plane magnetic anisotropy materials shows the effectiveness of the proposed design for pinning DW at the nanoconstriction region. The critical current for moving DW from one state to the other is strongly dependent on nanoconstricted region (width and length) and the magnetic properties of the material. The DW speed which is essential for fast writing of the data could reach values in the range of hundreds m/s. Furthermore, evidence of multi-bit per cell memory is demonstrated via a magnetic nanowire with more than one constriction.
Spintronic devices currently rely on magnetic switching or controlled motion of domain walls (DWs) by an external magnetic field or a spin-polarized current. Controlling the position of DW is essential for defining the state/information in a magnetic memory. During the process of nanowire fabrication, creating an off-set of two parts of the device could help to pin DW at a precise position. Micromagnetic simulation conducted on in-plane magnetic anisotropy materials shows the effectiveness of the proposed design for pinning DW at the nanoconstriction region. The critical current for moving DW from one state to the other is strongly dependent on nanoconstricted region (width and length) and the magnetic properties of the material. The DW speed which is essential for fast writing of the data could reach values in the range of hundreds m/s. Furthermore, evidence of multi-bit per cell memory is demonstrated via a magnetic nanowire with more than one constriction.
A magnetic domain wall (DW) is a spatially localized change of magnetization
configuration in a ferromagnetic material. The motion of DW using spin transfer torque
(STT) has attracted great interest in fundamental theoretical studies and promising
potential applications, such as high density magnetic storage and logic devices1234567891011. For memory application, several
requirements need to be fulfilled for a good functionality. For instance, the
non-volatility is desirable for saving the power consumption while scaling down the
device size; i.e. increasing the storage capacity, requires low writing and reading
currents1213. Magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) where two
ferromagnetic layers separated by a tunnel barrier was the first prototype of magnetic
memory devices. Writing and erasing the data on MTJ memory could be done by a polarized
current through reversal of the magnetization of a soft layer (called memory layer).
Although many of the requirements above can be achieved in an MTJ14151617181920, the limitation to two states remains an
obstacle toward high capacity memory. Multi-level MRAM where two memory layers could be
used to store four states was proposed to boost the storage capacity2122. Storing even larger data in one cell is possible by moving DW at different positions
within the nanowire. In DW-based memory, the stability and speed of DW have to be
controlled and optimized for actual application. Stabilizing DW at desired positions is
very important for a good functionality of the storage memory. Although many reports
were devoted to study domain wall dynamics and its motion under magnetic field, electric
field and/or polarized current232425262728293031323334, controlling its position
and its stability remains a big challenge353637383940. Creating
artificial defects were proposed and investigated to generate a potential that acts as a
pinning site for DW3536. Designing pinning sites by lithography is
challenging since this requires a high resolution process that is much better than
making the nanowire itself. It is much easier to create notches when the nanowire
dimension are in the hundreds nanometers and above. However, scaling down the nanowire
size to few tens of nanometer with even smaller notches is a tremendous technological
challenge. In this work, we propose a new way for pinning DW in magnetic nanowire with
adjustable size and position. The method is based on designing portions of a magnetic
nanowire with the same size but with a small off-set in either one direction or both.
Figure 1(a) shows a proposed nanowire with a single step. For
device fabrication, creating notches on a nanowire for pinning DW requires additional
nanofabrication process after the nanowire is made. Furthermore, since the dimension of
the notches have to be smaller than the width of the nanowire, their positions and size
uniformity will be challenging and could be a serious obstacle for their implementation.
In our proposed scheme shown in Fig. 1(a), the design could be
made in a single process. It is also easy to create an off-set of the two small patterns
in either x or y directions prior to the beam exposure on the resist
(polymer) which serves as an etching mask. The study demonstrates that DW could be
stabilized in the stepped region (constriction) and the pinning current depends on its
dimension (step depth d and step length l) and the magnetic material
properties such as anisotropy energy Ku and saturation magnetization
Ms. Figure 1(b) shows the case of multi-step
device for multi-bit per cell magnetic memory device.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation of a stepped type nanowire where the step
can be used for pinning domain wall. The dimensions of the nanowire and the
step are shown in the figure. The magnetization is aligned in the film plane
with easy axis along the x-axis. (b) An extended design to
multi-bit per cell magnetic memory. (c) the critical current
Jc to move domain wall from the pinning region as a
function of the step depth d which is the off-set in the
y-axis direction. The nanowire length L and width W
were fixed to 200 nm and 40 nm, respectively and the
magnetic properties of the investigated material are
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 1.0 × 105 J/m3.
Results
We consider a magnetic nanowire of length L, width W, and thickness
t with a stepped region. As the objective was to stabilize DW in this
region we also considered the nanowire is made of two parts with an off-set l
in the x direction and d in the y direction as illustrated in
Fig. 1(a).Micromagnetic simulation was conducted to study the magnetic DW motions in the
nanowire with the proposed scheme [http://math.nist.gov/oommf]. A magnetic material with in-plane
anisotropy was considered in this work with a mesh size of
2.5 nm × 2.5 nm × 3 nm.
The polarized electric current was flowing along the nanowire in the positive
x direction and the magnetization was initially aligned in the opposite
direction. In the first part of this study, the effect of stepped region dimension
l and d on DW dynamics is investigated while in a second part, we
were interested in the correlation between the magnetic properties and DW stability.
In all this study, the length L, the width W and the thickness
t were fixed to 200 nm, 40 nm and
3 nm, respectively. Also the exchange stiffness A and damping
constant α of the material were fixed to
1.0 × 10−11 J/m
and 0.05, respectively. These values are typical for materials such as Co, CoFe or
CoFeB alloys.
Nanoconstriction dimension and DW dynamics
By varying d and l we were able to stabilize DW at the stepped
region for current density below a critical value Jc. For
instance, it can be seen from Fig. 1(c) that at
l = 20 nm, it is not possible to
stabilize DW for values of d smaller than 15 nm which means
that there are optimal dimensions of the stepped region to favour DW stability.
For current density values above Jc, a continuous movement of
DW from one side to the other was observed. These calculations were carried out
for material with
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 1.0 × 105 J/m3.
Figure 2 presents plots of the time dependence of the
normalized x-component of magnetization
mx = Mx/Ms
for several values of d and l and for an applied current density
J = 4.8 × 1012 A/m2.
It can be noticed from Fig. 2(a) that the stabilization of
DW occurs for d > 25 nm, i.e.
larger applied current requires larger d for DW pinning. Similarly, the
time dependence of mx for
d = 20 nm and different values of
l is shown in Fig. 2(b). This means that
stabilizing DW within the vicinity of stepped region is possible by selecting
the optimal values of d and l for each applied current density. It
is worthy to note that for large d [Fig. 2(a)] or
small l [Fig.2(b)], the velocity of DW motion is
reduced and for the optimal values of d and l it starts to
oscillate before the pinning occurs.
Figure 2
Normalized x-component of nanowire magnetization as a function of time
for different values of the step depth d.
The length and width of the nanowire were fixed to 200 nm and
40 nm, respectively. The magnetic properties of the investigated
material are
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3
and
J = 4.84 × 1012 A/m2.
To elucidate the effect of device geometry on DW stability and its dynamics, the
magnetic configuration of a moving DW for two values of step depth d was
examined. The current density and length of the step l were fixed to
4.84 × 1012 A/m2
and 20 nm, respectively (Fig. 3). The snapshot
images were taken at three different positions within the nanowire. For
t = 0.2 ns, DW is still at the first
half of the nanowire and did not reach the stepped area. For the case of a
device with d = 25 nm, DW remained
pinned at the stepped region while for
d = 15 nm, it moved continuously as
can be seen for t = 0.45 ns. The same
result can also be observed for
d = 20 nm case. It can be noticed
that under the conditions discussed in Figs 2 and 3, we observed a clear transverse type DW.
Figure 3
Different positions for domain walls at different times for two values of
d.
The length and width of the nanowire were fixed to 200 nm and
40 nm, respectively. The magnetic properties of the investigated
material are
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3.
Material properties and DW dynamics
In the following, the effect of magnetic properties of the material on DW
dynamics for a fixed device geometry
(L = 200 nm,
W = 40,
l = 20 nm and
d = 20 nm) will be presented. First,
we varied Ku as reported in Fig. 4 while
Ms was fixed to 600 kA/m. The average velocity
taken from time dependence of mx is plotted as a function of
J for several values of Ku [Fig.
4a)]. For low anisotropy materials
(Ku < 3.5 × 104 J/m3),
no DW could be stabilized and we observed only DW movement with an almost linear
behavior of v with J. For
Ku = 2 × 104 J/m3,
DW moves freely without being affected by the change in the nanowire geometry as
reported by Zhang et al.41. The velocity can be expressed
by:
Figure 4
(a) Domain wall average velocity varies with current density for
different values of magnetic anisotropy energy. The nanowire length L
and width W were fixed to 200 nm and 40 nm,
respectively and the saturation magnetization of the investigated material
is Ms = 600 kA/m.
(b) The relationship between critical current density and
anisotropy energy.
where ħ is the reduced Planck constant, e is charge of
electron, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, P is the spin
polarization of the current and ε is the non-adiabatic
parameter42. It is worthy to note that for
Ku = 3 × 104 J/m3,
a deviation from a linear behavior was clearly seen. This is because although DW
could not be stabilized at the pinning region, it takes some time to be
released.We initially started with all the magnetic moments aligned in the negative
x direction and it takes some time to observe a creation of DW under
spin transfer torque effect. The average velocity is calculated from the time
the DW is created until it is pinned at the stepped region (for large
Ku values) or vanishes at the end of the nanowire (for
small Ku values).As Ku increases
(Ku ≥ 3.5 × 104 J/m3),
a pinned DW could be observed in the middle of nanowire for
J < Jc which is
indicated by the arrow in Fig. 4(a). This transition from
a stable to unstable DW is accompanied by a drop in the velocity. This is mainly
due to an increase of the time DW takes to be released from the stepped region.
For further increase of J, a steady increase of v is revealed.
After plotting Jc as a function of Ku when
DW stability is possible [Fig. 4(b)], we noticed that
there is a region where Jc increases linearly with
Ku (Ku between
3.5 × 104 J/m3
and
4.75 × 104 J/m3).
However, as Ku becomes larger, more complex behavior of
magnetic domains is observed. By looking at the details of magnetic moments
configuration, for two values of Ku, the shape of DW and its
evolvement with time could be imaged as shown in Fig. 5.
The DW position within the left side of the nanowire is not shown for
simplicity. When DW is created and until it reaches the stepped region we
observed a movement of a transverse DW for both values of Ku.
However, as the DW passed the stepped region, a change in DW configuration was
revealed. For
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3,
the transverse type DW could still be seen until it vanishes at the end of the
nanowire. In contrast, for
Ku = 1.0 × 105 J/m3,
DW starts to bend and an antivortex type DW could be observed. A current density
J = 5.5 × 1012 A/m2
was used in this calculation and snapshot images were taken times corresponding
to desired DW locations based on mx versus time graph. It is
noticed that antivortex type DW moves faster than transverse type43. Similar to the study conducted on Ku effect on DW dynamics
shown above (Figs 4 and 5), it was
observed that there is a minimum Ms value for stabilizing DW
at the stepped region. Figure 6 is a plot of
mx versus time for different values of
Ms and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3.
The current density was fixed to
2.6 × 1012 A/m2
and the device length and width were kept same as reported in Fig. 5. No pinning of DW could be seen for Ms
smaller than 560 kA/m. Neverthless, the slope in time dependence
curve of mx is an indication of a change in the DW velocity;
i.e, DW moves with a slower speed after passing the constriction region. For
Ms > 550 kA/m,
DW could be stabilized at the center as shown in Fig. 6
for Ms = 560 and 580 kA/m.
This is an important finding of this study. It is possible to stabilize DW by
creating an off-set of the nanowire at desired position. Furthermore, material
with larger Ms favors a faster DW creation for given current
density as indicated by t+ for 580 kA/m case.
To evaluate the velocity of DW, we considered the time difference between
t+ and the time when DW is either pinned
tp (large Ms case) or annihiled
t− (low Ms case). In the
insert of Fig. 6, the velocity v of DW was plotted
as a function of Ms for J of
2.6 × 1012 A/m2
and
2.9 × 1012 A/m2.
A continuous increase of v with Ms is observed. The
bold arrows show the critical Ms separating non-pinned and
pinned DW ranges. This critical value depends on the current density, device
dimension and Ku. It is important to mention about the
relatively large values of DW velocity obtained from the time dependence of
mx which is beneficial for a fast writing of data by a
polarized electric current. For a good stability of DW in the proposed device,
it is important to optimize the values of d and l. Figure 7 displays the calculated phase diagram for nanowire with
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3.
The stability of DW inside the nanowire could be seen for d larger than
15 nm and l below 25 nm (W was fixed to
40 nm). We also observed damped oscillation for large value of
d and l as shown in dashed region of Fig.
7. DW could be stabilized in very narrow range of current density.
More interestingly, DW with large amplitude oscillation could be seen in this
range.
Figure 5
Snapshot images of the nanowire with constriction for
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3
and
1.0 × 105 J/m3.
The length and width of the nanowire were fixed to 200 nm and
40 nm, respectively and the stepped region dimension d
and l were both fixed to 20 nm. The calculation was
carried at
Ms = 600 kA/m and
J = 5.5 × 1012 A/m2.
Figure 6
Normalized x-component of nanowire magnetization as a function of time
for different values of Ms.
The device lateral dimensions are
L = 200 nm,
W = 40 nm,
l = 20 nm and
d = 20 nm. The material magnetic
anisotropy is
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3
and
J = 2.6 × 1012 A/m2.
Figure 7
(a) Phase diagram d–l for device with
lateral dimension L = 200 nm and
W = 40 nm. The material
magnetic anisotropy are
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3.
(b) Normalized x-component of nanowire magnetization as a
function of time for selected values of d and l.
For a good performance of the memory device, it is also important to store more
than 2 bits/cell (i.e. four states) as experimentally demonstrated in
current-perpendicular to plane magnetoresistive devices based on magnetization
switching21. For this purpose, we investigated the
possibility of storing six states using a nanowire with four constricted
regions. The device lateral dimensions are
L = 200 nm,
W = 40 nm,
l = 10 nm and
d = 30 nm. Figure
8(a) is a plot of DW position for different current density values. A
transition from state 1, where all spins of the device are aligned in the
−x direction, to state 2 where only the spins on the left
side of the first nanoconstriction are reversed, occurs at
J = 1.0 × 1012 A/m2.
The second transition, i.e. from state 2 to state 3, happens at
2.4 × 1012 A/m2
as shown in Fig. 8. The six states obtained are very
stable for the device dimension reported above. For clarity, states 1 and 6 are
not shown. We conducted calculations with same values of Ms,
Ku, L and W, except l and d
which were fixed both to 20 nm as used is Fig.
6 but we were not able to obtain all the six states shown in Fig. 8(b).
Figure 8
(a) The six states of nanowire of dimentions
L = 200 nm,
W = 40 nm,
l = 10 nm and
d = 30 nm. The magnetic
properties of the investigated material are
Ms = 600 kA/m and
Ku = 0.5 × 105 J/m3.
(b) Snapshot images of four states obtained at different current
density values.
Discussion
We have demonstrated that in magnetic nanowire with a stepped region, DW could be
precisely pinned. The depinning current density could be easily adjusted by the
constriction dimension and the materials properties. As Ku
increases, larger Jc is required to move a transverse type DW from
one state to the other. However, further increase of Ku leads to
an antivortex type DW with a lower velocity. Similarly, a resonably large
Ms is needed to pin DW. Its velocity is improved as
Ms increases. The proposed scheme was extended to multi-step
device which showed a clear stability for DW at different positions. The magnitude
of DW depinning current and its movement speed could be well tailored by adjusting
the gerometry of the device and the materials properties. Optimal values for
Ku and Ms are required for each device.
Methods
We investigated the magnetization dynamics of a stepped nanowire with micromagnetic
simulations. The simulations are performed with the object-oriented micromagnetic
framework (OOMMF) which was extended to consider the current-induced magnetization
dynamics as described by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with additional
spin-transfer torque terms:where is the local normalized magnetization, γ the
gyromagnetic ratio, eff the effective field,
α the Gilbert damping factor, and β the
nonadiabatic spin-transfer parameter4144.The local effective magnetic field eff includes the
exchange, anisotropy and magnetostatic fields. The vector is the
adiabatic spin torque which has the dimension of velocity and is proportional to the
current density according towhere is the current density, g is the Lande factor,
μB the Bohr magnetron
(μB = 0.927 × 10−20 emu),
e the electron charge, P the polarization rate of the current
fixed to 0.6 and the nonadiabatic spin-transfer parameter β to
0.02.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Bahri, M. A. and Sbiaa, R. Geometrically pinned
magnetic domain wall for multi-bit per cell storage memory. Sci. Rep.
6, 28590; doi: 10.1038/srep28590 (2016).
Authors: Masamitsu Hayashi; Luc Thomas; Charles Rettner; Rai Moriya; Xin Jiang; Stuart S P Parkin Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2006-11-16 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: A V Khvalkovskiy; K A Zvezdin; Ya V Gorbunov; V Cros; J Grollier; A Fert; A K Zvezdin Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Amalio Fernández-Pacheco; Luis Serrano-Ramón; Jan M Michalik; M Ricardo Ibarra; José M De Teresa; Liam O'Brien; Dorothée Petit; Jihyun Lee; Russell P Cowburn Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.379