Literature DB >> 27334030

Predictors of Rapid Progression and Clinical Outcome of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Shunsuke Nishimura1, Chisato Izumi, Masataka Nishiga, Masashi Amano, Sari Imamura, Naoaki Onishi, Yodo Tamaki, Soichiro Enomoto, Makoto Miyake, Toshihiro Tamura, Hirokazu Kondo, Kazuaki Kaitani, Yoshihisa Nakagawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of aortic valve replacement (AVR) is controversial in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) except when very severe. Prediction of progression of severe AS is helpful in deciding on the timing of AVR. The purpose of this study was to clarify the predictors of progression rate and clinical outcomes of severe AS. METHODS AND 
RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated 140 consecutive patients with asymptomatic severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA], 0.75-1.0 cm(2)). First-year progression rate and annual progression rate of AVA and of aortic jet velocity (AV-Vel) were calculated. Cardiac events were examined and the predictors of rapid progression and cardiac events were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 36 months. The median annual progression rate was -0.05 cm(2)/year for AVA and 0.22 m/s/year for AV-Vel. Dyslipidemia, moderate-severe calcification, and first-year AV-Vel progression ≥0.22 m/s/year were independent predictors of cardiac events. Cardiac event-free rate was lower in patients with AV-Vel first-year progression rate ≥0.22 m/s/year than in those with a lower rate. Diabetes and moderate-severe calcification were related to first-year rapid progression.
CONCLUSIONS: The annual progression rate of severe AS was -0.05 cm(2)/year for AVA and 0.22 m/s/year for AV-Vel. Patients with first-year rapid progression or severely calcified aortic valve should be carefully observed while considering an early operation. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1863-1869).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334030     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  6 in total

1.  Increased Calcific Aortic Valve Disease in response to a diabetogenic, procalcific diet in the LDLr-/-ApoB100/100 mouse model.

Authors:  Marta Scatena; Melissa F Jackson; Mei Y Speer; Elizabeth M Leaf; Mary C Wallingford; Cecilia M Giachelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.185

Review 2.  Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Devraj Sukul; Marc R Dweck; Mahesh V Madhavan; Benoit J Arsenault; Megan Coylewright; W David Merryman; David E Newby; John Lewis; Frank E Harrell; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasiliki Tsampasian; Ciaran Grafton-Clarke; Abraham Edgar Gracia Ramos; George Asimakopoulos; Pankaj Garg; Sanjay Prasad; Liam Ring; Gerry P McCann; James Rudd; Marc R Dweck; Vassilios S Vassiliou
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-05

4.  Vitamin K antagonists and cardiovascular calcification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina D Kosciuszek; Daniel Kalta; Mohnish Singh; Olga V Savinova
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Rapidly progressive aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with Fabry disease: a case report.

Authors:  María C Saccheri; Tomás F Cianciulli; Federico L Blanco; Rodrigo I Blanco
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-17

Review 6.  Degenerative Aortic Stenosis, Dyslipidemia and Possibilities of Medical Treatment.

Authors:  Rita Kleinauskienė; Regina Jonkaitienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.