Vijayapandi Pandy1, Yasmin Khan. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
Morinda citrifolia L. commonly known as noni or Indian mulberry belongs to the family Rubiaceae. Noni fruit juice has recently become a very popular remedy for the treatment of several diseases, including psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to investigate the anticraving effect of Tahitian Noni® Juice (TNJ) against ethanol seeking behavior in ICR male mice using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. The CPP procedure consisted of four phases: preconditioning, conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement. During conditioning, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of ethanol (2 g/kg body weight (bw)) and normal saline (10 ml/kg bw) were given on alternate days for 12 days. Then, the animals were subjected to extinction trials for the next 12 days to weaken CPP. Finally, CPP was reinstated in the extinguished animals by a single low-dose priming injection of ethanol (0.4 g/kg bw, i.p.). The effect of TNJ (as a source of drinking water) on different phases of ethanol CPP in mice was studied. TNJ-treated mice showed a significant reduction in ethanol seeking behavior in the CPP test. The reference drug, acamprosate (ACAM) also showed a similar effect in the CPP test. The outcome of this study suggests that TNJ is effective in attenuating ethanol craving in mice and could be utilized for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Further clinical studies in this direction are warranted to support the present preclinical findings.
Morinda citrifolia L. commonly known as noni or Indian mulberry belongs to the family Rubiaceae. Noni fruit juice has recently become a very popular remedy for the treatment of several diseases, including psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to investigate the anticraving effect of Tahitian Noni® Juice (TNJ) against ethanol seeking behavior in ICR male mice using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. The CPP procedure consisted of four phases: preconditioning, conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement. During conditioning, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of ethanol (2 g/kg body weight (bw)) and normal saline (10 ml/kg bw) were given on alternate days for 12 days. Then, the animals were subjected to extinction trials for the next 12 days to weaken CPP. Finally, CPP was reinstated in the extinguished animals by a single low-dose priming injection of ethanol (0.4 g/kg bw, i.p.). The effect of TNJ (as a source of drinking water) on different phases of ethanol CPP in mice was studied. TNJ-treated mice showed a significant reduction in ethanol seeking behavior in the CPP test. The reference drug, acamprosate (ACAM) also showed a similar effect in the CPP test. The outcome of this study suggests that TNJ is effective in attenuating ethanol craving in mice and could be utilized for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Further clinical studies in this direction are warranted to support the present preclinical findings.
Dependence on alcohol or any other drug abuse can affect all day-to-day normal activities
of the user. Drug abusepatients not only spoil their health but also damage their social
life (e.g., loss of their families, friends, and jobs and indulging in deviant behavior).
Drug dependency is characterized as uncontrolled drug use, long-term relapses, and a
powerful desire for drug use that can happen even after a long period of abstinence [2]. Regarding pharmacological treatment strategies for
drug dependence, some recent studies focused on and highlighted the efficacies of medicinal
herbs in combating many kinds of drug dependence, including alcohol, cocaine, nicotine,
methamphetamine, and opioid dependence [20, 21].Acamprosate (calcium acetylhomotaurinate) is a putative anticraving drug used clinically to
treat alcohol dependence. Its mechanism of action is not completely clear, but evidence
suggests that the anticraving effect of acamprosate is mediated by reducing the pathologic
glutamatergic hyperactivity that occurs during protracted withdrawal from alcohol [3]. Animal studies revealed that acamprosate can reduce
ethanol consumption, ethanol withdrawal severity, and relapse [10, 16, 34]. In clinical studies, acamprosate was similarly found to be effective
in prolonging abstinence and reducing the rate of relapse [16].Morinda citrifolia L is a small tropical woody evergreen shrub native to
Southeast Asia. It was initially cultivated by Polynesians in Tahiti, the Marquesas, and
Hawaiian Islands. Its’ cultivation is now extended to the South Pacific, Caribbean, South
America, and West Indies [33]. Recently, noni juice
attained wide attention due to its various health benefits in treating cancer and its
associated pain, nausea, vomiting, arthritis, diabetes, and CNS disorders such as anxiety,
depression, and psychosis [29, 33]. Noni juice is obtained from the ripe fruit of the noni and is
commercially available as a health drink, herbal drink, and food supplement. Consumption of
noni juice has been approved by the Scientific Committee on Food of the European Commission
[4]. The commercial value of noni products is
constantly increasing, which is evident from the number of US patents filed that make use of
Morinda citrifolia. To date, 119 patents related to Morinda
citrifolia have been registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office [36].The different parts of the noni have been used in herbal medicine for many years to treat
cancer; cardiovascular illness (i.e., high blood pressure, heart disease, atherosclerosis);
mental illnesses such as anxiety, depression, and psychosis; diabetes; arthritis; muscle
aches and pains; sprains; menstrual difficulties; gastric ulcers; senility; poor digestion;
headaches; and drug addiction [32, 37]. There is, however, a growing belief in the efficacy
of noni in treatment of various drugs of abuse as described in the website “Regenerative
Nutrition,” and we have had personal communication with an Ayurvedic practitioner who claims
to have success in treating various drugs of abuse with noni. Scientific evidences for the
claim of being able to treat heroin addiction has been recently reported by our research
group [25]. As a continuation of our recent report,
this study was undertaken to examine the effect of noni juice on ethanol-seeking behavior in
mice using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test.The CPP paradigm is a widely used and validated animal model for study of the rewarding
effects of a wide variety of self-administered drugs, including ethanol [35]. It can also be used to model the relapse of
drug-seeking behavior after a period of drug withdrawal or abstinence; in such instances,
exposure to low doses of the addictive substance or administration of mild stress can induce
reinstatement of otherwise “extinguished” CPPs [1].
The present study investigated the effect of Tahitian Noni Juice (TNJ) on the rewarding
properties of ethanol in acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement of ethanol CPP in
mice.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Male ICR mice (UKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) weighing 25 to 30 g (7–8 weeks of age) were
housed in polycarbonate cages for two weeks before use. All animals were housed in groups
(n=4–5 per cage) and were maintained with a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights off at 19:00), a
temperature of 20 to 23oC, and a humidity of 40 to 60% with free access to food
and purified water. The animals were acclimatized to the housing unit and handled for 7
days before the start of the experimental session. Utmost care was taken to minimize
animal suffering. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal
Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur (Approval
No. 2013-12-03/PHAR/R/VP), and care of the animals was performed according to the Guide
for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by National Research Council of the
National Academics of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, USA (“Guide for the Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals,” Eighth Edition) [15].
Drugs
Ethanol (10% v/v) was obtained by dilution of 95% v/v ethanol (Copens Scientific,
Malaysia) in sterile water for injection. Ethanol and normal saline were administered
intraperitoneally. Acamprosate (ACAM; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) solution was prepared using 0.5%
w/v sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) at a dose of 300 mg/kg body weight (bw), and it
was administered orally 1 h prior to behavioral testing. The drug solution was prepared
fresh prior to the start of the experiment and administered at a constant volume of 10
ml/kg bw of the animal. The commercially available noni fruit juice brand, TNJ, was
provided from local suppliers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In the TNJ-treated group, TNJ was
made available to the animals as a source of drinking water throughout the study period,
with plain water being provided for 1 h daily. The average consumption of TNJ was
calculated to be 18.4 ml/100 g bw/day. In our recent publication, we reported that the
average amounts of TNJ consumed at 10, 30, and 100% v/v were ~6, 10, and 13 ml/100 g/day,
respectively [29].
Conditioned place preference apparatus
Place preference conditioning was performed as described elsewhere [7, 19] with minor modifications.
The CPP test box was made of plexiglass (45(L)×15(W)×15(H) cm) and was divided into two
equal-sized compartments (20×15×15 cm) by insertion of two removable plexiglass
partitions; the two compartments were separated by a small gray zone (5×15×15 cm) in the
middle of the chamber. The two compartments had distinct visual and tactile cues: the
compartment on one side had black walls with white horizontal stripes and had white wire
mesh on the floor (white compartment), while the compartment on the other side had white
walls with vertical black lines and a smooth black plexiglass floor (black compartment).
Matched removable partitions were used to close-off each compartment. Transparent
plexiglass lids allowed observation of animal behavior on a computer connected to a
Logitech HD Webcam placed above the apparatus. Mouse behavior was recorded on a computer
and later scored by an experimenter who was blind to each subject’s treatment status.
CPP procedure and experimental design
The CPP methodology was divided into six distinct phases: habituation,
preconditioning/baseline, conditioning, post-conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement.
The experimental design is shown in Fig. 1. All tests were conducted during the same time period of each day (08:00–15:00
h).
Fig. 1.
Experimental timeline.
Experimental timeline.
Habituation and preconditioning
After 3 days habituation of the mice in the CPP box, each mouse was placed in the central
gray-painted compartment of the CPP box for 5 min, both removable partitions were lifted,
and the animals were allowed to explore freely both compartments for 15 min. The procedure
the next day (Day 0) was conducted in the identical manner to habituation except that the
time spent in each compartment was recorded and served as the preconditioning baseline. In
every trial, animals were immediately returned to their home cages following testing. On
the preconditioning day, in order to avoid preference for either of the two compartments,
the innate preference of each animal was determined as described previously [21]. Any mouse that exhibited a strong unconditioned
aversion (<33% of the session time spent in one side of the apparatus, i.e., 300 s) or
preference (>66% of the session time spent in one side of the apparatus, i.e., 600 s)
for either compartment was removed from the study. In this study, the white and black
compartments were paired with ethanol and saline, respectively, as described elsewhere
[21].
Conditioning
During the conditioning phase (Day 1–Day 12), each mouse (n=9/group) received ethanol and
saline on alternate days in alternate compartments (white and black) before being confined
to the respective compartments for 12 days. A mouse placed in the white compartment with a
white mesh base received intraperitoneal injections of ethanol, whereas in the black
compartment with a polished black surface, the mouse was injected with normal saline. The
test groups (vehicle, TNJ, and ACAM) received ethanol injections (2 g/kg bw, i.p.) on Days
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 and saline (10 ml/kg bw, i.p.) injections on Days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
and 12 of the conditioning phase. The saline control group received saline injections in
both compartments on both odd and even days of the 12-day conditioning. After each
injection (ethanol or saline), the mice were immediately confined to the respective
conditioning compartment for 30 min, and then the animals were returned to their home
cages. The post-conditioning test was performed on Day 14 (48 h following the last
conditioning session). On the post-conditioning test day, the mice in an ethanol-free
state were placed in the central gray compartment for 5 min, both partitions were lifted,
and the animals were allowed to move freely for 15 min. The time spent in each compartment
during the 15-min session was recorded. A conditioning score in seconds was determined by
subtracting the time spent in the white compartment from the time spent in the black
compartment.
Effect of TNJ on the rewarding properties of ethanol in different phases of the CPP
test
To study the effect of TNJ on the rewarding properties of ethanol, the TNJ-treated mice
were tested for their preference regarding the black and white compartments on Day 14
(post-conditioning test), Days 15–26 (extinction tests), and Day 28 (reinstatement test).
The reference drug ACAM-treated mice were similarly tested.After 12 days of conditioning, animals were allowed to rest on the 13th day.
The post-conditioning test was performed on Day 14. Beginning the day after the
post-conditioning test, extinction tests were carried out for 12 days (Day 15 to Day 26).
On each extinction day, the test mice (n=7–9/ group) were exposed individually to the
apparatus for 15 min with free access to both compartments. The time spent by the animals
in each compartment was recorded for 15 min. No ethanol or saline injections were given to
the animals during the extinction phase of the study. Extinction testing was performed in
all treatment groups (saline, vehicle, TNJ, and ACAM) for 12 days (Day 15 to Day 26).One day after the last extinction session (27th day), the mice were allowed to
rest (not subjected to a CPP test). The next day (28th day), the mice received
a low-dose ethanol priming injection (0.4 g/kg bw, i.p.) or saline (10 ml/kg bw, i.p). The
TNJ-treated group continued drinking TNJ as described earlier, while the other reference
group received ACAM (300 mg/kg bw) per os (p.o.) 60 min before a low-dose ethanol priming
injection. Fifteen minutes after the ethanol priming injection, the mice were subjected to
reinstatement testing in which the mice were freely allowed to explore both compartments
for 15 min. The time spent in each compartment was measured.
Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The CPP results were analyzed using two-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc multiple comparisons
using the Bonferroni test and one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc
Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was set as
P<0.05.
Results
The effect of TNJ and ACAM on the rewarding properties of ethanol in the ethanol CPP test
on the post-conditioning day (Day 14) is presented in Fig. 2. The ANOVA results revealed significant effects of group [F (3,
64) = 3.769; P<0.05] and group × trial interaction [F
(3, 64) = 4.000; P<0.05]. The Bonferroni test revealed that the
conditioning score of the vehicle-treated group on the post-conditioning day was
significantly (P<0.01) increased when compared with that on the
preconditioning day. However, the conditioning scores on the post-conditioning day were
not altered in TNJ- and ACAM- treated groups, which implies that TNJ and ACAM had
anticraving effects.
Fig. 2.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on the acquisition of ethanol CPP in mice. Data are
expressed as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment paired
with ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline (n=9/group).
There was a significant difference (**P<0.01) between the
preconditioning and post-conditioning results; when not indicated, the differences
were not statistically significant.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on the acquisition of ethanol CPP in mice. Data are
expressed as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment paired
with ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline (n=9/group).
There was a significant difference (**P<0.01) between the
preconditioning and post-conditioning results; when not indicated, the differences
were not statistically significant.Moreover, the ethanol-seeking behaviors of the TNJ- and ACAM- treated groups were
compared with that of the vehicle-treated group during the extinction phase of the ethanol
CPP and are depicted in Fig. 3. The ANOVA results revealed significant effects of group [F (3,151) = 33.48;
P<0.0001] and group × trial interaction [F (15,
151) = 4. 900; P<0.0001]. A separate one-way ANOVA on the data from
each extinction trial revealed that there were significant differences in conditioning
score on extinction Day 15 [F (3, 25) = 57.58, P<0.0001], Day 17 [(3,
25) = 12.23, P<0.0001], and Day 19 [(3, 25) = 19.92,
P<0.0001]. The vehicle control (VEH) group showed a marked
preference for the ethanol-paired compartment from Day 15 to Day 21; after that, it
returned to the same level of conditioning score as the respective saline control (SAL)
group. The post hoc analyses revealed that TNJ significantly reduced the
conditioning scores on Days 15 to 19. Similarly, the acamprosate-treated (300 mg/kg bw,
p.o.) animals showed a significant reduction in conditioning scores on extinction days
(Day 15 to Day 19).
Fig. 3.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on the extinction of ethanol CPP in mice. Data are expressed
as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment paired with
ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline (n=7-9/group).
There were significant differences (#P<0.05, ###
P<0.001) compared with saline control (SAL) group and compared
with the vehicle control (VEH) group (*P<0.05, ***
P<0.001); when not indicated, the differences were not
statistically significant.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on the extinction of ethanol CPP in mice. Data are expressed
as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment paired with
ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline (n=7-9/group).
There were significant differences (#P<0.05, ###
P<0.001) compared with saline control (SAL) group and compared
with the vehicle control (VEH) group (*P<0.05, ***
P<0.001); when not indicated, the differences were not
statistically significant.The effect of TNJ and ACAM on the rewarding properties of ethanol on reinstatement (Day
28) of ethanol CPP is shown in Fig. 4. The ANOVA results revealed significant effects of group [F (3, 53) =10. 04;
P<0.001] and group × trial interaction [F (3, 53) = 3. 287;
P<0.05]. The Bonferroni test revealed that the conditioning score of
the vehicle-treated group on the reinstatement (Day 28) was significantly
(P<0.05) increased when compared with before reinstatement (Day 26).
However, the conditioning scores on the reinstatement day were not altered in the TNJ- and
ACAM-treated groups, which implies that TNJ and ACAM had anticraving effects on
reinstatement of ethanol CPP.
Fig. 4.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on low-dose ethanol-priming reinstatement of CPP in mice.
Data are expressed as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment
paired with ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline
(n=7-9/group). There was a significant difference (*P<0.01)
between before and after reinstatement; when not indicated, the differences were not
statistically significant.
Effect of TNJ and ACAM on low-dose ethanol-priming reinstatement of CPP in mice.
Data are expressed as the mean difference between the times spent in the compartment
paired with ethanol and the times spent in the compartment paired with saline
(n=7-9/group). There was a significant difference (*P<0.01)
between before and after reinstatement; when not indicated, the differences were not
statistically significant.
Discussion
Despite the many reports published on noni, only a few neuropharmacological activities have
been reported in the literature. Younos et al. (1990) demonstrated the
sedative and analgesic activities of noni root extracts in mice and postulated the
involvement of a central opioid receptor mechanism [39]. Kalandakanond et al. (2004) reported the anxiolytic activity
of noni juice in rats in a study in which the authors compared the anxiolytic effects of 15
or 30 days treatment with noni juices obtained from different sources, French Polynesia
(Tahitian Noni Juice®) and Thailand (Siam Noni Juice®). The results of their study revealed
the similar efficacies of both brands of noni juice at both time points, which were
comparable with the efficacy of the reference drug, diazepam. Additionally, a 30-day
treatment with both brands of noni juice did not significantly alter daily food consumption,
body weight gain, and biochemical parameters related to liver and kidney functions [17]. These results confirmed the safety of noni juice in
subacute treatment for 30 days. Recently, noni juice has been reported to have nootropic
activity in stress-induced cognitively impairedmice using the Morris water maze (MWM) test
[24].Taking into consideration this brief summary of the neuropharmacological activities of noni
juice reported in the literature, this study adds a new possible therapeutic benefit of noni
juice with respect to alcohol dependence. The present study examined the effect of noni
juice (TNJ) on the rewarding properties of ethanol using the CPP test in mice. Its results
demonstrated that consumption of noni juice, TNJ, as a source of drinking water
significantly alleviated the ethanol-seeking behavior in mice. Similarly, the reference drug
ACAM (300 mg/kg bw, p.o.) significantly attenuated the ethanol-seeking behavior, which is
consistent with a previously published report [22].The amount of oral ethanol consumption in rodents provides a reliable index of ethanol’s
rewarding and reinforcing properties [14]. However,
various factors such as genetic and environmental vulnerability, anxiety, novelty-seeking
behavior, and the taste of ethanol may limit oral consumption of ethanol [6, 30]. For
instance, C57BL/6J mice (a strain with typically high ethanol consumption) exhibited weaker
CPPs as compared with other inbred and mutant mice [14]. Other studies established ethanol CPP by simple alteration of the route of
administration, the time of dose administration, or the cue paired with ethanol [5, 8, 9].Addiction is a persistent brain disease that occurs in episodes. Ethanol and other drugs of
abuse exert their rewarding effects through activation of the dopaminergic system. Certain
brain areas like the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and locus
coeruleus and their connections inside the midbrain play a vital role in dopaminergic
neurotransmission [1, 11]. Ethanol stimulates DA release in the nucleus accumbens, which likely
represents the neurobiological substrate for reward [26]. Eating (e.g., sweets), sexual behavior, and even gambling increases
intra-synaptic levels of dopamine (DA) in certain brain areas, especially the nucleus
accumbens [13]. Addicted users of ethanol showed a
decreased density of D2 receptors in the ventral striatum that persisted long
after detoxification [13]. Interestingly,
administration of D2 receptor antagonists was reported to reduce ethanol
self-administration [12]. Thus it could be postulated
that drugs having neuromodulatory effects on the dopaminergic system could be effective in
the treatment of drug addiction.Kalandakanond-Thongsong and Charoenphandhu (2012) reported that noni juice (1 ml/day for 15
days) significantly reduced neurotransmitters, including noradrenaline in the amygdala and
the hippocampus, 5-HT in the amygdala, and dopamine metabolites in the rat brain, such as
DOPAC in the hippocampus and the substantia nigra and HVA in the substantia nigra [18]. In our earlier report, pretreatment with noni juice
(TNJ) in drinking water for 7 and 21 days at 30, 50, and 100% v/v significantly attenuated
apomorphine-induced climbing behavior dose dependently in mice and demonstrated the
antidopaminergic effect of the noni juice (TNJ) [29].
Therefore, it can be suggested that the antidopaminergic activity of noni juice could be
involved in the attenuation of the rewarding effects of ethanol in the mouse CPP test.
However, further mechanistic studies in this direction are warranted to unravel the actual
mechanism of action of noni in treatment of alcohol dependence.Furthermore, drugs that affect the motor activity of animals can influence CPP results.
However, Pachauri et al. (2013) demonstrated that there was no significant
difference in spontaneous locomotor activity in mice treated with a noni fruit extract
[28]. Similarly, rats treated with noni juice
orally for 15 days exhibited no alteration in motor activity [17]. It therefore seems that the effects of noni in the current CPP
results cannot easily be accounted for by drug-induced changes in the subjects’ motor
activity.Drugs that alter cognitive function (e.g., memory or attention) might also be expected to
alter CPP data independent of their effects on reward. For example, N- Methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA) receptor antagonists (MK-801 and memantine) blocked the development and expression of
conditioned place preferences induced by rewarding drugs such as morphine without any
interaction in the reward pathways but instead by simply affecting cognitive function [1, 31]. Recently,
Pachauri et al. (2012) demonstrated a nootropic effect of Morinda
citrifolia fruit in which fruit extract significantly reversed
scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice [27].
Likewise, in another report, an ethyl acetate extract of noni fruit prevented beta-amyloid
(25–35)-induced cognitive dysfunction in mice [23].
In addition, administration of noni fruit juice protected brains from stress-induced
impairment of cognitive function [24]. Given these
results, it seems unlikely that the observed attenuation of ethanol CPP by TNJ in the
current study can be accounted for by drug-induced memory impairment.It has been well documented that reexposure to addictive substances and their related
stimuli can reinstate the craving for a particular addictive substance [38]. In the present study, a low-dose of ethanol (0.4
g/kg bw, p.o.) priming in ethanol-extinguished animals significantly reinstated ethanol
seeking in the CPP test. However, a similar reinstatement of ethanol CPP did not occur in
TNJ- and ACAM-treated mice. This indicated the anticraving property of TNJ in the
reinstatement of ethanol CPP in mice. In conclusion, we report for the first time that TNJ
is effective in preventing ethanol seeking in the different phases of CPP in mice. Further
clinical studies using noni fruit juice are warranted to support the present preclinical
findings and to treat alcohol dependence.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors: Bruno Ribeiro Do Couto; Maria A Aguilar; Carmen Manzanedo; Marta Rodríguez-Arias; Jose Miñarro Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.067