INTRODUCTION: The transsphenoidal endoscopic approach is a relatively new procedure compared to the microscopic approach in pituitary adenoma resection. The endoscopic approach has shown to significantly decrease the rate of complications, time in the operating room and hospital, and patient post-op discomfort. However, this procedure requires the surgeon to make use of different visual and tactile clues that must be developed with experience. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning curve that the surgeon must overcome to become proficient with the endoscopic approach. METHODS: Retrospective review of a single-surgeon consecutive series of 78 patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery from 2006 to 2012 at Rush University Medical Center has been used in this study. Patients were grouped according to an early (n = 9) and late group (n = 68) determined by a significant difference in outcomes. Our primary outcome measures were: duration of operation, CSF leak, hospital length of stay, visual field improvement, diabetes insipidus, panhypopituitarism, and subtotal resection. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in OR time and intraoperative CSF leaks between the early and late groups. There was no difference in hospital LOS or visual field improvement between the groups. With regards to complication rates, there was no difference found for DI, panhypopituitarism, lumbar drain placement, sinusitis, or subtotal resection between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there may be a learning curve of approximately 9 cases before a surgical team can decrease OR times and reduce the rate of intraoperative CSF leaks for the endonasal endoscopic approach to pituitary adenoma resection.
INTRODUCTION: The transsphenoidal endoscopic approach is a relatively new procedure compared to the microscopic approach in pituitary adenoma resection. The endoscopic approach has shown to significantly decrease the rate of complications, time in the operating room and hospital, and patient post-op discomfort. However, this procedure requires the surgeon to make use of different visual and tactile clues that must be developed with experience. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning curve that the surgeon must overcome to become proficient with the endoscopic approach. METHODS: Retrospective review of a single-surgeon consecutive series of 78 patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery from 2006 to 2012 at Rush University Medical Center has been used in this study. Patients were grouped according to an early (n = 9) and late group (n = 68) determined by a significant difference in outcomes. Our primary outcome measures were: duration of operation, CSF leak, hospital length of stay, visual field improvement, diabetes insipidus, panhypopituitarism, and subtotal resection. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in OR time and intraoperative CSF leaks between the early and late groups. There was no difference in hospital LOS or visual field improvement between the groups. With regards to complication rates, there was no difference found for DI, panhypopituitarism, lumbar drain placement, sinusitis, or subtotal resection between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there may be a learning curve of approximately 9 cases before a surgical team can decrease OR times and reduce the rate of intraoperative CSF leaks for the endonasal endoscopic approach to pituitary adenoma resection.
Authors: Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Khodayar Goshtasbi; Brandon M Lehrich; Mehdi Abouzari; Arash Abiri; Jack Birkenbeuel; Ming-Ying Lan; Wei-Hsin Wang; Gilbert Cadena; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Navid Redjal; Andrew S Venteicher; Danielle Dang; Andrew Sloan; Remi A Kessler; Rebecca R Baron; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis; Clark C Chen; Mateo Ziu; Jeffrey J Olson; Brian V Nahed Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Eduardo Vieira; Thiago C Guimarães; Erton C A Pontes; Ana C V Silva; Marcelle C Carneiro; Arlindo U Netto; Lívio Pereira; Auricélio B Cezar; Igor Faquini; Nivaldo S Almeida; Maria F L Griz; Hildo R C Azevedo-Filho Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Pier Paolo Mattogno; Filippo Marciano; Michael P Catalino; Davide Mattavelli; Paola Cocca; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Piero Nicolai; Edward R Laws; Ian Witterick; Shaan M Raza; Anand K Devaiah; Liverana Lauretti; Alessandro Olivi; Marco M Fontanella; Fred Gentili; Francesco Doglietto Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Daniel J Lobatto; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Alberto M Pereira; Wilco C Peul; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Nienke R Biermasz; Wouter R van Furth Journal: Pituitary Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Leonie H A Broersen; Femke M van Haalen; Nienke R Biermasz; Daniel J Lobatto; Marco J T Verstegen; Wouter R van Furth; Olaf M Dekkers; Alberto M Pereira Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 4.123