Literature DB >> 27331653

Are we going about chemical risk assessment for the aquatic environment the wrong way?

Andrew C Johnson1, John P Sumpter2.   

Abstract

The goal of protecting the aquatic environment through testing thousands of chemicals against hundreds of aquatic species with thousands of endpoints while also considering mixtures is impossible given the present resources. Much of the impetus for studies on micropollutants, such as pharmaceuticals, came from the topic of endocrine disruption in wild fish. But despite concern over reductions in fish fertility, there is little evidence that fish populations are in peril. Indeed, fish biologists suggest that many cyprinid populations have been recovering for the past 30 to 40 yr. The central assumption, key to current risk assessment, that effects observed in the laboratory or predicted by models are readily transferrable to the population level, is therefore questionable. The neglect in monitoring wildlife populations is the key weakness in environmental protection strategies. If we do not know whether aquatic wildlife species are declining or increasing, how valuable are our other ecotoxicological activities? Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:1609-1616.
© 2016 SETAC. © 2016 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic; Chemical, Wildlife; Monitoring; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27331653     DOI: 10.1002/etc.3441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; John P Sumpter; Anne Fairbrother; Thomas P Augspurger; Timothy J Canfield; William L Goodfellow; Patrick D Guiney; Anne LeHuray; Lorraine Maltby; David B Mayfield; Michael J McLaughlin; Lisa S Ortego; Tamar Schlekat; Richard P Scroggins; Tim A Verslycke
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  Demographic and genetic consequences of disturbed sex determination.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Review of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment and Its Relevance to Environmental Regulators.

Authors:  Andrew C Singer; Helen Shaw; Vicki Rhodes; Alwyn Hart
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Nesting success of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) in marshes in an anthropogenic landscape.

Authors:  Scott K Robinson; Holly M McChesney
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.653

5.  Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.

Authors:  Miina Yanagihara; Kyoshiro Hiki; Yuichi Iwasaki
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.