Literature DB >> 27331111

Dataset for transcriptional response of barley (Hordeum vulgare) exposed to drought and subsequent re-watering.

Filip Kokáš1, Petr Vojta1, Petr Galuszka1.   

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is an economically important species, which can be cultivated in environmentally adverse conditions due to its higher tolerance in contrast to other cereal crops. The draft of H. vulgare genome is available already for couple of years; however its functional annotation is still incomplete. All available databases were searched to expand current annotation. The improved annotation was used to describe processes and genes regulated in transgenic lines showing higher tolerance to drought in our associated article, doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2016.01.010 (Vojta et al., 2016) [1]. Here we present whole transcriptome response, using extended annotation, to severe drought stress and subsequent re-watering in wild-type barley plants in stem elongation phase of growth. Up- and down-regulated genes fall into distinct GO categories and these enriched by stress and revitalization are highlighted. Transcriptomic data were evaluated separately for root and aerial tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barley; Drought stress; Genome annotation; Re-watering; Transcriptomics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27331111      PMCID: PMC4908270          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the data

Improvement of a functional annotation of Hordeum vulgare genome draft. This dataset provides the list of all up- and down-regulated genes during one day long desiccation and subsequent re-watering separately in roots and upper part of 4-week-old barley seedlings. Enriched gene ontology (GO) term analysis highlights processes targeted by above mentioned conditions. The dataset can serve as a source of candidate genes for markers used for drought associated studies.

1. Data

This data consist of five high-throughput sequenced samples of barley roots (Supplementary Table 1, n=2) and upper part (Supplementary Table 2, n=3), exposed to optimal or drought conditions and subsequent re-watering, generated from an Illumina HiSeq 2500, together with GO term analysis of the most affected Biological Processes (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). Predicted genes from the latest genome version (082214v1.25) have been annotated based on three various databases (Fig. 1) and associated to GO term categories (Fig. 2). Several GO terms have been assigned to each predicted sequence (Fig. 3).
Table 1

The most affected GO terms from Biological Processes in the stressed roots and percentage of differentially expressed genes (adjusted p-value ≤0.05) at the GO level 6.

GO number
GO term
Total #
% of affected genes
DOWN-REGULATED
GO:0010089xylem development1369.23%
GO:0071103DNA conformation change10459.62%
GO:0070726cell wall assembly1154.55%
GO:0048544recognition of pollen9150.55%
GO:0006915apoptotic process29650.34%
GO:0051129negative regulation of cellular component organization1050.00%
GO:0001666response to hypoxia1650.00%
GO:0009664plant-type cell wall organization7648.68%
GO:0046271phenylpropanoid catabolic process2147.62%
GO:0007166cell surface receptor signaling pathway4247.62%
GO:0009834plant-type secondary cell wall biogenesis1947.37%
GO:0015851nucleobase transport1346.15%
GO:0006002fructose 6-phosphate metabolic process1145.45%
GO:0042886amide transport6544.62%
GO:0000910cytokinesis10643.40%



UP-REGULATED
GO:0071462cellular response to water stimulus1163.64%
GO:0009407toxin catabolic process3360.61%
GO:0072348sulfur compound transport1060.00%
GO:1902644tertiary alcohol metabolic process2259.09%
GO:0044242cellular lipid catabolic process9757.73%
GO:0033015tetrapyrrole catabolic process3557.14%
GO:0042538hyperosmotic salinity response2055.00%
GO:0010286heat acclimation2653.85%
GO:0046164alcohol catabolic process1050.00%
GO:0046434organophosphate catabolic process1250.00%
GO:0048545response to steroid hormone2050.00%
GO:0050801ion homeostasis8048.75%
GO:0055082cellular chemical homeostasis5248.08%
GO:0042542response to hydrogen peroxide6246.77%
GO:0009699phenylpropanoid biosynthetic process2846.43%
Table 2

The most affected GO terms from Biological Processes in the stressed aerial part and percentage of differentially expressed genes (adjusted p-value ≤0.05) at the GO level 6.

GO number
GO term
Total #
% of affected genes
DOWN-REGULATED
GO:0009765photosynthesis, light harvesting3287.50%
GO:0019750chloroplast localization6771.64%
GO:0051667establishment of plastid localization6771.64%
GO:0009668plastid membrane organization12370.73%
GO:0009658chloroplast organization14667.12%
GO:0016226iron-sulfur cluster assembly7062.86%
GO:0019682glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate metabolic process21662.04%
GO:0051156glucose 6-phosphate metabolic process12161.16%
GO:0033014tetrapyrrole biosynthetic process10259.80%
GO:0042727flavin-containing compound biosynthetic process1258.33%
GO:0010374stomatal complex development6953.62%
GO:0009767photosynthetic electron transport chain5750.88%
GO:0006720isoprenoid metabolic process25549.02%
GO:0006778porphyrin-containing compound metabolic process13847.83%
GO:0016143S-glycoside metabolic process6046.67%



UP-REGULATED
GO:0042538hyperosmotic salinity response2050.00%
GO:0009962regulation of flavonoid biosynthetic process1136.36%
GO:0010647positive regulation of cell communication1533.33%
GO:0006026aminoglycan catabolic process1833.33%
GO:0046348amino sugar catabolic process1833.33%
GO:1901071glucosamine-containing compound metabolic process1833.33%
GO:0060548negative regulation of cell death2931.03%
GO:0010583response to cyclopentenone1428.57%
GO:0046271phenylpropanoid catabolic process2128.57%
GO:0033015tetrapyrrole catabolic process3528.57%
GO:0009414response to water deprivation6827.94%
GO:1902644tertiary alcohol metabolic process2227.27%
GO:0043067regulation of programmed cell death6325.40%
GO:0006662glycerol ether metabolic process3225.00%
GO:0009407toxin catabolic process3324.24%
Table 3

The most affected GO terms from Biological Processes in the aerial parts 12 h after re-watering and percentage of differentially expressed genes (adjusted p-value ≤0.05) at the GO level 6.

GO number
GO term
Total #
% of affected genes
DOWN-REGULATED
GO:0009765photosynthesis, light harvesting3281.25%
GO:0071462cellular response to water stimulus1163.64%
GO:0051156glucose 6-phosphate metabolic process12153.72%
GO:0009767photosynthetic electron transport chain5752.63%
GO:0019750chloroplast localization6750.75%
GO:0051667establishment of plastid localization6750.75%
GO:0072525pyridine-containing compound biosynthetic process2050.00%
GO:0009637response to blue light4948.98%
GO:0019682glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate metabolic process21646.30%
GO:0010109regulation of photosynthesis1346.15%
GO:0043085positive regulation of catalytic activity7945.57%
GO:0016143S-glycoside metabolic process6045.00%
GO:0006778porphyrin-containing compound metabolic process13844.93%
GO:0009668plastid membrane organization12344.72%
GO:0033014tetrapyrrole biosynthetic process10243.14%



UP-REGULATED
GO:0042273ribosomal large subunit biogenesis1471.43%
GO:0000741karyogamy2564.00%
GO:0072528pyrimidine-containing compound biosynthetic process9759.79%
GO:0000085mitotic G2 phase2356.52%
GO:0043572plastid fission1154.55%
GO:0006518peptide metabolic process49849.20%
GO:0043604amide biosynthetic process51248.44%
GO:0007292female gamete generation6946.38%
GO:0007006mitochondrial membrane organization1145.45%
GO:0051604protein maturation4744.68%
GO:0006026aminoglycan catabolic process1844.44%
GO:0046348amino sugar catabolic process1844.44%
GO:1901071glucosamine-containing compound metabolic process1844.44%
GO:0051169nuclear transport12544.00%
GO:0009553embryo sac development11043.64%
Fig. 1

Venn diagram showing numbers of genes due to the source database used for their annotation.

Fig. 2

Distribution of GO terms in whole transcriptome on the level 2 for Biological Processes (A), Molecular Function (B) and Cellular Component (C).

Fig. 3

GO terms distribution per sequence annotated in improved Hordeum vulgare reference genome.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Plant material

Spring barley plants, cultivar Golden Promise, were grown in a phytotron with a photoperiod of 15 °C/16 h light and 12 °C/8 h dark in soil or in hydroponic tanks containing aerated Hoagland nutrient solution. Samples of root tissue 4 weeks after germination were collected from hydroponically grown plants due to the inability to collect root tissues from soil without initiation of mechanical stress. The stress was applied by removing the nutrient solution off the tank. Control samples were collected just before stress induction; stressed root samples were collected 24 h later. Aerial part samples were collected from 4 week old plants cultivated in the shallow soil. Watering on daily basis was interrupted for four days and stressed samples were collected in the end of the drought period. Revitalization samples were collected 12 h after re-watering. Each sequencing library was prepared from pool of 3 individual plants.

Annotation

Additional annotation of predicted genes was mined using Blast2GO version 3.0 program to improve raw reference genome available at Ensembl (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html, version 082214v1.25). Gene description from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI; version b2g_Jan15) were mined using the BLAST module from program Blast2GO with parameters blastn and e-value ≤10−5. The other step in annotation process was mapping predicted genes to other databases using Blast2GO with default parameters. Additional annotation of other predicted genes was extracted from The UniProt Knowledgebase database (http://www.uniprot.org/, version 2015_02) and the Plant Genome and Systems Biology database (PGSB; http://pgsb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/plant/, version 2014_07_31) for hits with blastn stringency of e-value ≤10−5. Finally, annotation information was obtained for 17,885 genes from a total number of 26,072 predicted genes in Hordeum vulgare genome (Fig. 1). Gene ontology analysis was performed using the Blast2GO v.3.0 [2], firstly for all predicted genes and then specifically for significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes with adjusted p-value (padj) ≤0.05. Total number of 70,719 GO terms was assigned to 20,991 predicted genes. Out of these 40.87%, 42.12% and 17.01% were assigned to Biological Processes, Molecular Function and Cellular Component GO categories, respectively (Fig. 2). Number of GO terms assigned to one predicted sequence was in range from 1 to 35 (Fig. 3). Differentially expressed genes were categorized to Biological Processes (BP), Cellular Components (CC) and Molecular Functions (MF) on the level 6. Number of differentially expressed genes for particular GO terms was compared with total number of genes assigned to the term and enriched GO terms were highlighted (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). Supplementary Appendix A, Appendix A contains GO terms at the level 6 with associated 10 or more genes in roots and aerial part, respectively. GO terms with associated 9 or less genes were filtered out and are not listed. GO terms are sorted due to increased percentage in category of differentially expressed genes with adjusted p-value ≤0.05 from total number of genes with the same assigned GO term. The 30 most affected Biological Processes are shown for stressed root (Table 1), stressed aerial part (Table 2) and the aerial part after re-watering (Table 3).

RNA-extraction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted and cDNA sequencing library was prepared and sequenced as described elsewhere [1], [3].

RNA-seq analysis

Single end reads generated by the sequencing were mapped to the reference genome and quantified the same way as described in Ref. [1]. The comparison for differentially expressed genes among 3 time-points (before stress, during stress, 12 h after re-watering) was conducted using the DESeq2 package [4] implemented in R (R Development Core Team, 2008). Normalized RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped) were subjected to principle components analysis (PCA) in order to control quality of replicates. The PCA analysis shows good accordance between replicates, which cluster together (Fig. 4). The log2fold value is calculated for each gene and genes are sorted according to adjusted p-value. Positive log2fold values are for up-regulated and negative for down-regulated genes. The base mean value represents mean of normalized RPKM for all comparisons and thus expresses transcript abundance of each gene in particular organ.
Fig. 4

The PCA analysis for replicates from root samples before stress (Root_Ctrl) and during drought stress period (Root_Stress), and from the upper part before stress (Upper_Ctrl), during stress (Upper_Stress) and 12 h after re-watering (Upper_R12H).

Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaRNA-seq transcriptome data of barley (Hordeum vulgare)
Type of dataTables and figures
How data was acquiredSequencing on Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencing System
Data formatProcessed, analyzed
Experimental factorsSamples were exposed to severe drought stress and subsequently re-watered
Experimental featuresRNA was extracted using RNAqueous kit and purified on magnetic beads. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA kit from Illumina and quantified using the Kapa Library Quantification kit. Libraries were sequenced on HiSeq 2500 Illumina platform.
Data source locationPalacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Data accessibilityData are within this article
  4 in total

1.  Whole transcriptome analysis of transgenic barley with altered cytokinin homeostasis and increased tolerance to drought stress.

Authors:  Petr Vojta; Filip Kokáš; Alexandra Husičková; Jiří Grúz; Veronique Bergougnoux; Cintia F Marchetti; Eva Jiskrová; Eliška Ježilová; Václav Mik; Yoshihisa Ikeda; Petr Galuszka
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.079

2.  Transgenic barley overexpressing a cytokinin dehydrogenase gene shows greater tolerance to drought stress.

Authors:  Hana Pospíšilová; Eva Jiskrová; Petr Vojta; Katarína Mrízová; Filip Kokáš; Mária Majeská Čudejková; Veronique Bergougnoux; Ondřej Plíhal; Jana Klimešová; Ondřej Novák; Lenka Dzurová; Ivo Frébort; Petr Galuszka
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.079

3.  Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research.

Authors:  Ana Conesa; Stefan Götz; Juan Miguel García-Gómez; Javier Terol; Manuel Talón; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Differential gene expression and gene ontologies associated with increasing water-stress in leaf and root transcriptomes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne).

Authors:  Albert Fradera-Sola; Ann Thomas; Dagmara Gasior; John Harper; Matthew Hegarty; Ian Armstead; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Novel insights into the effect of drought stress on the development of root and caryopsis in barley.

Authors:  Fali Li; Xinyu Chen; Xurun Yu; Mingxin Chen; Wenyi Lu; Yunfei Wu; Fei Xiong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Genome-Wide Identification, Expression Pattern and Sequence Variation Analysis of SnRK Family Genes in Barley.

Authors:  Jiangyan Xiong; Danyi Chen; Tingting Su; Qiufang Shen; Dezhi Wu; Guoping Zhang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.