Literature DB >> 27331000

Identification of differentially expressed genes in sexed pig embryos during post-hatching development in primiparous sows exposed to differing intermittent suckling and breeding strategies.

Stephen Tsoi1, Milena Blanes1, Tai Yuan Chen2, Pieter Langendijk3, Rebecca Athorn4, George Foxcroft1, Michael Dyck1.   

Abstract

The aim of commercial pig breeding programs is to maximize the number of pigs produced per sow per year. Given that sows exhibit an estrus during lactation is a potential means of increasing productivity of a pig breeding herd without reducing in lactation length, conventionally, weaning of piglets at a relatively young age is often related to post-weaning piglet performance which compromises piglet welfare. Therefore, intermittent suckling (IS) is a management technique in which lactating sows are separated from their piglets for a fixed period of the days and allowing sows to continue nursing piglets while exhibiting estrus and being breed during lactation, thereby promoting both piglet well-being and sow reproductive performance [1]. For this study, primiparous sows (PP) were exposed to 28 day (D28) lactation with intermittent suckling (IS) during the final week prior to weaning. The sows detected to be in estrus during lactation were either bred at this first estrus (FE) during lactation (IS21FE), or were "skipped" and bred at their second estrus which occurred after final weaning at D28 (IS21SE). Despite the benefits of IS, the effects of the maternal physiology related to breeding during lactation on embryonic transcriptome are largely unknown. Recent advances in the ability to assess embryonic gene expression in both sexes have made these analyses possible. Here, we describe the experimental procedures of two color microarray analyses and annotation of differentially expressed (DE) genes in detail corresponding to data deposited at NCBI in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE53576 and GSE73020 for day 9 embryos (D9E) and day 30 embryos (D30E) respectively. Although only a few DE genes were discovered between IS21FE and IS21SE in both sexes from D9E or D30E, the raw data are still valuable for future use to understand the gene expression profiling from two different developmental stages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; Differential gene expression; Embryo; Microarray; PCR sex typing; Pig

Year:  2016        PMID: 27331000      PMCID: PMC4909839          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE53576. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE73020 See Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Microarray design for day 9 and day 30 embryos of both sexes indicated in A and B respectively. The numbers indicate the biological replicates in each group and arrows indicate dye swap between groups. Three embryos with similar weight were pooled in each biological replicate.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Embryos collection and PCR sexing

First parity sows were submitted to an ovulation-induction protocol, intermittent suckling (IS), during lactation [2]. Sows were humanely euthanized at day 9 (D9E) and day 30 (D30E) of gestation for embryo collection. An additional control group of day 30 embryos (C28) was also collected from control sows bred after weaning at day 28 of lactation. All embryos were stored at − 80 °C before further usage. A modified HotSHOT method [4] was used to obtain DNA for sex typing. PCR sexing was performed using a single pair of primers (Table 1) redesigned based on the pig amelogenin (AMEL) genes located on X and Y chromosomes [5], [6]. Phire Hot Start II DNA Polymerase (F-122S, ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to perform PCR with an initial denaturation at 98 °C for 30 s, followed by setting the PCR program for 30 cycles first at 98 °C for 5 s, annealing temperature at 61.8 °C for 5 s and extension at 72 °C for 10 s, and then with final extension temperature at 72 °C for 1 min. A single band size corresponding to 850 bp amplicon appeared in the gel for both sexes with an additional smaller amplicon of 670 bp observed for male embryos due to 180 bp of deletion in Y chromosome.
Table 1

PCR primers information.

Primer namesSequenceLengthGC contentMelt tempaGenBank accession
AMELF5′-GCTTGCATCAAGAAGATAGAG-3′2143%58.8 °CAB091791.1
AMELR5′-GCTCAGTTAATCCTACTCTAGCC-3′2347.83%59.6 °CAB091792.1

Melting temperature calculation according to the Tm requirement of Phire hot Start II DNA Polymerase from thermo-scientific-web-tools/tm-calculator.

Microarray design & performance

Agilent custom made array-031068 referring to porcine embryo-specific microarray (EMPV1) was used in this study [3]. A dye-swapped (Cy3 & Cy5 fluorescent dyes) direct comparison design with 3 biological replicates was used in both D9E (GSE53576) and D30E (GSE73020) studies for both sexes as shown in Fig. 1. In D9E study, no control group was used when comparing between IS21FE and IS21SE directly (Fig. 1A), however, for the D30E study (GSE73020) a control group (C28) was dye-swapped either with IS21FE or IS21SE (Fig. 1B). Dyes labeling and arrays hybridization were performed under Ozone Free Box™ (BioTray, Villeurbanne, France) inside a dark room with light control system.

Microarray analyses

Microarray data analyses were performed using FlexArray software version 1.6.3 (http://genomequebec.mcgill.ca/FlexArray) for data normalization methods using simple background subtraction, LOWESS normalization within and between arrays (Fig. 2). Further analysis to detect DE genes was performed using embedded programs in the software such as limma [7] and the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (BH-FDR) [8] multiple comparison correction condition with additional switching on the calculation setting for false positives due to the dye effect. In analyzing D30E, C28 was set as a reference during the analysis in order to detect DE genes between IS21FE and IS21SE (Fig. 3). Threshold parameters setting for DE genes were considered to be significant when a fold change (FC) was ≥ 2 (or ≤ 0.5) with a BH-FDR adjusted P value (B-H P-value) ≤ 0.05 in both studies. Under Volcano plot view of P-values from Flexarray analyses between IS21FE and IS21SE treatment, more spots were identified to be statistical significantly in female (27 spots) than male (4 spots) of D30E (Fig. 4). A similar trend was found in D9E study with a total of 26 and 2 spots detected to be significant in female and male respectively.
Fig. 2

Box plot of M-values of expression before and after the normalization process using simple background subtraction, LOWESS normalization within and between arrays.

Fig. 3

Experimental design settings for D30E from FlexArray analyses in (A) female and (B) male embryos using a control group as a reference when comparing between IS21FE and IS21SE to identify DE genes.

Fig. 4

Volcano plots from Flexarray analyses between IS21FE and IS21SE treatments in (A) female and (B) male D30E. The large red diamonds = significant spots, FC = fold change threshold, Adj P-val = Adjusted P-value threshold and black spots influenced by dye effect.

Gene annotation

Gene annotation was performed using probe sequences from NCBI BLAST program http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&BLAST_SPEC=OGP__9823__10718 by selecting two different pig nucleotide databases: Annotated RNAs (Annotation Release 105) or Genome (Sscrofa10.2 reference Annotation Release 105) to maximize the search with positive hits. Sequences were considered to be significant alignments when the identity was more than a 98% match with the bit score ranging from 56.5 to 111. After extensive re-annotation, only 23 of the DE genes from both studies (Table 2) received the same gene symbols in pig with their human orthologs, and it was found that only two genes, GTPBP2 [9] and MIR9-3 [10]. could be regulated by the reproductive hormone estrogen after extensive PubMed literature search.
Table 2

Gene annotation data.

Query idSubject ids (human)% IdentityAlignment length,MismatchesGap opens,q. startq. ends. start,s. endevalueBit scoreGene symbol (human)Description
NM_001185169.1NM_005698.388.776157714871157424157402040SCAMP3Homo sapiens secretory carrier membrane protein 3 (SCAMP3), transcript variant 1, mRNA
NM_001244237.1NM_022731.493.41956621195590104501436NUCKS1Homo sapiens nuclear casein kinase and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 (NUCKS1), mRNA
NM_001244939.1NM_000849.487.065804975280428210790966GSTM3Homo sapiens glutathione S-transferase mu 3 (brain) (GSTM3), transcript variant 1, mRNA
NM_001246214.1NM_021034.287.338308381463531514573.42E-102376IFITM2Homo sapiens interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3), transcript variant 1, mRNA
NM_214420.1NM_000772.281.36819003418471937256215101806CYP2C49Homo sapiens cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 18 (CYP2C18), transcript variant 1, mRNA
NR_035366.1NR_029525.193.50677501773795.09E-24116MIR16-2Homo sapiens microRNA 16-2 (MIR16-2), microRNA
NR_128410.1NR_029692.110079001796843.66E-32143MIR9-3Homo sapiens microRNA 9-3 (MIR9-3), microRNA
XM_001927622.6NM_006699.383.1035492690755154121538405597MAN1A2Homo sapiens mannosidase, alpha, class 1A, member 2 (MAN1A2), mRNA
XM_003124162.1NM_001005213.184.87591913431915191801021OR9G1Homo sapiens olfactory receptor, family 9, subfamily G, member 1 (OR9G1), mRNA
XM_003125012.3NM_006062.280.803261534449725121256602374SMYD5Homo sapiens SMYD family member 5 (SMYD5), mRNA
XM_003128412.5NM_019096.486.8463018288341296249301303599GTPBP2Homo sapiens GTP binding protein 2 (GTPBP2), transcript variant 1, mRNA
XM_003353380.3NM_014793.484.317221933055221435224402426LCMT2Homo sapiens leucine carboxyl methyltransferase 2 (LCMT2), mRNA
XM_003357386.4NM_001684.487.6212690317714270023269903333ATP2B4Homo sapiens ATPase, Ca ++ transporting, plasma membrane 4 (ATP2B4), transcript variant 2, mRNA
XM_005667703.2NM_001127358.191.0554874344341148624480706754PHTF2Homo sapiens putative homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PHTF2), transcript variant 3, mRNA
XM_005667845.2NM_024420.288.30928743041040290780292703653PLA2G4AHomo sapiens phospholipase A2, group IVA (cytosolic, calcium-dependent) (PLA2G4A), transcript variant 1, mRNA
XM_005668710.2NR_003525.273.904292070027408569843299617601764LRRC37A6PHomo sapiens leucine rich repeat containing 37, member A6, pseudogene (LRRC37A6P), non-coding RNA
XM_013978437.1NM_203459.275.1434200925248414937669485202866CAMSAP2Homo sapiens calmodulin regulated spectrin-associated protein family, member 2 (CAMSAP2), transcript variant 2, mRNA
XM_013980250.1NM_001178123.192.9622103126111209471216003095ABI1Homo sapiens abl-interactor 1 (ABI1), transcript variant 10, mRNA
XM_013984138.1NM_052905.391.1273539297412536502353604964FMNL2Homo sapiens formin-like 2 (FMNL2), mRNA
XM_013986179.1NM_198510.280.5553245551131320831323203021ITIH6Homo sapiens inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain family, member 6 (ITIH6), mRNA
XM_013989713.1NM_016548.373.9032575442621243233252001543GOLM1Homo sapiens golgi membrane protein 1 (GOLM1), transcript variant 1, mRNA
XM_013991759.1NM_001195141.179.1511367231159134924136201162TCOF1Homo sapiens Treacher Collins-Franceschetti syndrome 1 (TCOF1), transcript variant 7, mRNA
XM_013999054.1NM_001010980.479.5698811431671515721029680738NCMAPHomo sapiens noncompact myelin associated protein (NCMAP), mRNA
In conclusion, only a few DE genes were identified in D9E or D30E between IS21FE and IS21SE and more DE genes were found in females than males in response to the unique physiological condition present in IS treated PP sows.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueDay 9 and day 30 embryos from primiparous sows exposed to differing intermittent suckling and breeding strategies
SexMale and female embryos
Sequencer or array typeAgilent custom made array-031068, EMPV1 (GPL17779)
Data formatRaw data in gpr files and LOWESS normalized log2 ratio
Experimental factorsUsing without or with C28 as a reference group when comparing IS21FE versus IS21SE from pre-sexed day 9 or day 30 embryos respectively
Experimental featuresTranscriptome response of day 9 and day 30 female and male embryos to two different maternal breeding strategies IS21FE and IS21SE
ConsentN/A
Sample source locationEdmonton/Alberta/Canada
  8 in total

1.  Intermittent suckling enables estrus and pregnancy during lactation in sows: effects of stage of lactation and lactation during early pregnancy.

Authors:  R Gerritsen; N M Soede; W Hazeleger; P Langendijk; S J Dieleman; M A M Taverne; B Kemp
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Accurate and Phenol Free DNA Sexing of Day 30 Porcine Embryos by PCR.

Authors:  Milena S Blanes; Stephen C M Tsoi; Michael K Dyck
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Differences of the porcine amelogenin X and Y chromosome genes (AMELX and AMELY) and their application for sex determination in pigs.

Authors:  Luca Fontanesi; Emilio Scotti; Vincenzo Russo
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Sex identification of pigs using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the amelogenin gene.

Authors:  Shoichiro Sembon; Shun-ichi Suzuki; Dai-ichiro Fuchimoto; Masaki Iwamoto; Tatsuo Kawarasaki; Akira Onishi
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 1.442

5.  Gene expression profiles in breast tumors regarding the presence or absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors.

Authors:  Maria Aparecida Nagai; Nancy Da Rós; Mário Mourão Neto; Silvio Rodrigues de Faria Junior; Maria Mitzi Brentani; Roberto Hirata; Eduardo Jordão Neves
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Xenoestrogen-induced epigenetic repression of microRNA-9-3 in breast epithelial cells.

Authors:  Pei-Yin Hsu; Daniel E Deatherage; Benjamin A T Rodriguez; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Yu-I Weng; Tao Zuo; Joseph Liu; Alfred S L Cheng; Tim H-M Huang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Endocrine changes before and after weaning in response to boar exposure and altered suckling in sows.

Authors:  E A Newton; J S Stevenson; J E Minton; D L Davis
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1987-11

8.  Development of a porcine (Sus scofa) embryo-specific microarray: array annotation and validation.

Authors:  Stephen Tsoi; Chi Zhou; Jason R Grant; J Alexander Pasternak; John Dobrinsky; Philippe Rigault; Julie Nieminen; Marc-André Sirard; Claude Robert; George R Foxcroft; Michael K Dyck
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sex Determination Using RNA-Sequencing Analyses in Early Prenatal Pig Development.

Authors:  Susana A Teixeira; Adriana M G Ibelli; Maurício E Cantão; Haniel C de Oliveira; Mônica C Ledur; Jane de O Peixoto; Daniele B D Marques; Karine A Costa; Luiz L Coutinho; Simone E F Guimarães
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.