| Literature DB >> 27330881 |
Abstract
OBJECT: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of single-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis in the aged and to discuss the surgical strategies of this intervention.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330881 PMCID: PMC4870656 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2243-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Demographic data
| Parameters | No. |
|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 12/16 |
| Average age (years) | 72.3 ± 8.6 |
| Number of vertebrae affected | |
| One | 9 |
| Two | 19 |
| Preop. Frankel grade | |
| Grade A | 0 |
| Grade B | 0 |
| Grade C | 4 |
| Grade D | 12 |
| Grade E | 12 |
| Distribution of lumbar tuberculosis | |
| T12 + L1 | 1 |
| L1 | 2 |
| L1 + L2 | 3 |
| L2 | 1 |
| L2 + L3 | 5 |
| L3 | 2 |
| L3 + L4 | 5 |
| L4 | 4 |
| L4 + L5 | 5 |
| Preo. Kyphosis angle | 30.9 ± 10.5 |
Evaluation criteria of bone fusion
| A | Definitive fusion: definitive bony trabecular briding across the graft interface, no motion on flexion–extension X-ray films, and no gap at the interface |
| B | Probable fusion: no definitive bony trabecular crossing, but no detectable motion and no identifiable gap at the interface |
| C | Possible pseudarthrosis: no bony trabecular crossing, no motion, but identifiable gap at the interface |
| D | Definite pseudarthrosis: no traversing trabecular bone, definitive gap, and motion greater than 3° |
Fig. 1Images in a 64-year-old woman with L4 and L5 tuberculous spondylitis. a, b Preoperative X-ray films demonstrate collapse of the L4 and L5 vertebras with narrow intervertebral space. c–e Preoperative sagittal CT and T1 and T2 W MRIs demonstrate bone destruction and posterior epidural abscess at L4/5. f Immediate postoperative X-film showed that the patient received posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion and instrumentation at the lesion. g, h X-ray films reveal bone fusion and internal fixation in good position at 2-year follow-up
Radiographic results
| Pre-operation | Post-operation | Final follow up | Correction* | Loss of correction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyphosis angle (°) | 30.9 ± 10.5 | 17.2 ± 3.5 | 18.8 ± 1.3 | 13.7 ± 3.8 | 1.6 ± 1.1 |
* Statistically significant difference comparing preoperative and postoperative values (t = 8.811, p < 0.001)
Neurologic recovery according to Frankel scoring system
| Preoperation | Final follow-up | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | D | E | ||
| C | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| D | 12 | 12 | ||
| E | 12 | 12 | ||
Fig. 2Scatter plot shows the ODI scores of every patient preoperatively and at final follow-up, with significant difference (t = 19.19, p < 0.0001)