| Literature DB >> 27330861 |
Ajit K Passari1, Vijai K Gupta2, Bhim P Singh1.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance poses a serious challenge to global public health. In this study, fifty bacterial strains were isolated from the sediments of a freshwater lake and were screened for antibiotic resistance. Out of fifty isolates, thirty-three isolates showed resistance against at least two of the selected antibiotics. Analysis of 16S rDNA sequencing revealed that the isolates belonged to ten different genera, namely Staphylococcus(n = 8), Bacillus(n = 7), Lysinibacillus(n = 4), Achromobacter(n=3), bacterium(n = 3), Methylobacterium(n = 2), Bosea(n = 2), Aneurinibacillus(n = 2), Azospirillum(n = 1), Novosphingobium(n = 1). Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and BOX-PCR markers were used to study the genetic relatedness among the antibiotic resistant isolates. Further, the isolates were screened for their antimicrobial activity against bacterial pathogens viz., Staphylococcus aureus(MTCC-96), Pseudomonas aeruginosa(MTCC-2453) and Escherichia coli(MTCC-739), and pathogenic fungi viz., Fusarium proliferatum (MTCC-286), Fusarium oxysporum (CABI-293942) and Fusarium oxy. ciceri (MTCC-2791). In addition, biosynthetic genes (polyketide synthase II (PKS-II) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)) were detected in six and seven isolates, respectively. This is the first report for the multifunctional analysis of the bacterial isolates from a wetland with biosynthetic potential, which could serve as potential source of useful biologically active metabolites.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Antibiotic susceptibility; BOX-PCR; ERIC-PCR; NRPS; PKS II
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330861 PMCID: PMC4906672 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial isolates against 12 tested standard antibiotics.
| Isolate No | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | TE | Gen | M | Of | Nx | E | S | K | Fr | Kt | Nf | |
| BPSWAC1 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC3 | R | S | I | R | I | I | S | I | I | S | S | I |
| BPSWAC4 | R | S | S | R | S | S | I | R | S | I | S | S |
| BPSWAC5 | R | S | S | R | R | S | R | I | S | R | S | S |
| BPSWAC6 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | S | S | I | S |
| BPSWAC7 | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | R |
| BPSWAC9 | R | S | S | R | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | S |
| BPSWAC14 | R | S | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC20 | R | I | S | R | S | I | I | S | R | S | R | S |
| BPSWAC26 | R | S | S | R | R | S | I | R | R | R | S | R |
| BPSWAC39 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | S | S |
| BPSWAC41 | R | S | S | R | R | S | R | S | S | S | R | I |
| BPSWAC79 | R | S | S | R | S | S | R | I | S | R | S | S |
| BPSWAC80 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | I | S | S |
| BPSWAC81 | R | S | I | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R |
| BPSWAC82 | R | S | S | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | S |
| BPSWAC83 | R | S | R | R | S | S | S | R | R | S | R | S |
| BPSWAC84 | R | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | S | S | R |
| BPSWAC85 | R | S | S | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC90 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | S | R | R |
| BPSWAC91 | R | S | S | R | S | S | R | I | S | I | S | S |
| BPSWAC92 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | I | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC93 | R | S | S | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | R |
| BPSWAC94 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | S | S | I | R |
| BPSWAC107 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC108 | R | S | S | R | S | R | R | S | S | S | R | R |
| BPSWAC109 | R | S | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC110 | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC111 | R | S | S | R | S | S | I | S | S | S | R | R |
| BPSWAC112 | R | S | R | R | S | S | S | I | R | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC113 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC114 | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| BPSWAC115 | R | S | S | R | I | S | I | S | S | S | R | S |
Notes.
Sensitive
intermediate
resistant
Gentamicin (10 g)
Norfloxcin (30 g)
Tetracycline (30 g)
Ampicillin (10 g)
Erythromycin (15 g)
Streptomycin (30 g)
methicillin (5 g)
ofloxacin (5 g)
Kanamycin (5 )
Furazolidone (50 g)
Ketoconazole (50 g)
Nitrofurantoin (200 g)
Figure 1Dendrogram generated from (A) ERIC-PCR and (B) BOX-PCR genomic fingerprints of bacterial isolates using Ntsys 2.0.
In vitro antagonistic activity of selected bacterial isolates against fungal and bacterial pathogens and detection of biosynthetic genes.
| Isolate no. | NCBI accession no | Percentage of inhibition (PI ± SD) | Zone of inhibition in mm (ZI ± SD) | PKS II | NRPS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPSWAC9 |
| 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 9 ± 0.1a | 6 ± 0.29a | 9 ± 0.18a | − | − |
| BPSWAC14 |
| 60.50 ± 0.00bc | 64.38 ± 0.17bc | 0.00a | 9 ± 0.1a | 12 ± 0.2bc | 10 ± 0.05bc | + | + |
| BPSWAC20 |
| 0.00a | 58.9 ± 0.26bde | 0.00a | 10 ± 0.1bc | 8 ± 0.10bde | 9 ± 0.2a | − | + |
| + | + | ||||||||
| BPSWAC83 |
| 65.78 ± 0.28bdfg | 0.00a | 0.00a | 7 ± 0.25bde | 8 ± 0.05bde | − | − | − |
| BPSWAC84 |
| 0.00a | 39.72 ± 0.001bdfhi | 47.36 ± 0.02bde | 9 ± 0.0a | 12 ± 0.3bc | 10 ± 0.2bc | + | + |
| BPSWAC90 |
| 47.36 ± 0.03bdfhi | 45.2 ± 0.02bdfhj | 47.36 ± 0.14bde | 8 ± 0.02bdf | 7 ± 0.15bdef | − | + | + |
| + | + | ||||||||
| BPSWAC109 |
| 50 ± 0.045bdfhj | 0.00a | 0.00a | 9 ± 0.1a | 9 ± 0.05bdeg | 11 ± 0.1bd | + | + |
Notes.
Mean (±SD) followed by the same letter(s) in each column are not significantly different at P < 0.05 using Duncan’s new multiple range test, (+) and (−) indicates the presence and absence of PKS II and NRPS genes.
Figure 2Pie chart showing the distribution of bacteria in water sediment of Tamdil Lake.
Figure 3(A) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene of bacteria identified from Tamdil Lake. (B) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA genes. Numbers at branches indicate bootstrap values of neighbour-joining analysis (>50%) from 1,000 replicates.