| Literature DB >> 27330766 |
Akimitsu Hiraki1, Daiki Fukuma2, Masashi Nagata2, Shinya Shiraishi3, Kenta Kawahara2, Yuichiro Matsuoka2, Yoshihiro Nakagawa2, Ryoji Yoshida2, Takuya Tanaka2, Yoshihiro Yoshitake4, Masanori Shinohara4, Yasuyuki Yamashita3, Hideki Nakayama2.
Abstract
It has recently been established that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an applicable and feasible procedure for the prediction of neck lymph node status in patients with early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who are clinically negative for neck metastasis (cN0). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare excision followed by watchful waiting with excision and SNB, in order to determine the effectiveness of SNB. A total of 125 patients with cN0 early OSCC were divided into two groups, namely the excision alone (n=78) and excision with SNB (n=47) groups. The clinical data of these two groups between 2006 and 2013 were analyzed. In the excision with SNB group, the negative predictive value and false-negative rate of SNB were 94% (30/32) and 18% (2/11), respectively. Secondary neck metastasis, also known as delayed neck metastasis, occurred in 24.2% of the patients in the excision alone group and 4.9% of the patients in the excision with SNB group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 84.0 and 97.5% in the excision alone and excision with SNB groups, respectively. Significant differences were found in the rate of secondary neck metastasis and OS between the two groups. SNB may be effective in the detection of occult neck lymph node metastasis, with a reduction in the incidence of secondary neck metastasis and improvements in the 5-year OS in patients with early-stage (stage I/II) oral cancer.Entities:
Keywords: biopsy; delayed neck metastasis; elective neck dissection; oral squamous cell carcinoma; secondary neck metastasis; sentinel lymph node; watchful waiting
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330766 PMCID: PMC4906622 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Clin Oncol ISSN: 2049-9450