Literature DB >> 27330686

Simvastatin Treatment Does Not Affect Serum Vitamin D Concentrations in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Cross-over Trial.

Mohsen Mazidi1, Haleh Rokni2, Amir Hossein Sahebkar3, Akram Mohammadi4, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan5, Gordon A Ferns6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are antihyperlipidemic drugs with an established efficacy in stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques and preventing atherogenesis and reducing cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of simvastatin on serum Vitamin D status in dyslipidemic patients as Vitamin D status has an impact on monocyte/macrophage function and may also contribute to cardiovascular risk.
METHODS: Selected individuals (n = 102) were treated with simvastatin (40 mg/day), or matching placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Each treatment period (with simvastatin or placebo) lasted for 30 days and was separated by a 2-week washout phase. Serum Vitamin D concentration was assessed pre- and post-treatment.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven completed the trial, noncompliance with the study protocol and drug intolerance or relocation were the causes for drop-out. No significant carry-over effect was observed for the assessed parameters. There was a reduction in the serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.001), total cholesterol (P < 0.001), and triglycerides (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, simvastatin therapy did not significantly affect serum level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Vitamin D level (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with simvastatin (40 mg/day) does not have a significant affect on serum levels of Vitamin D.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Randomized controlled trial; Vitamin D; simvastatin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330686      PMCID: PMC4910308          DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.183652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prev Med        ISSN: 2008-7802


INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerosis is the major cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality globally.[1] Very recent studies in Iran displayed the prevalence of the obesity,[2] hypertension,[3] and hypercholesterolemia[4] are 30.9%, 23%, and 41.6%, respectively. The statin group of drugs is widely used to treat hypercholesterolemia in patients at CVD risk.[5] Statins inhibit the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis, hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, and reduce serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially.[5] Further to their conventional lipid-modulating effects, statins possess so-called “pleiotropic” properties, which comprise improvement of endothelial function, antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory properties, plaque stabilization, and inhibition platelet aggregation and thrombus formation.[6] It has been reported that statins treatment may be associated with an improved Vitamin D status,[78910] but this is not a consistent finding.[111213] There is emerging evidence suggesting that a decreased Vitamin D concentration might rise the possibility of several conditions including cancers and CVD.[1415] If statins do have an impact on Vitamin D concentration this could be a reasonable elucidation of the described results of diminished risk of fracture; moreover, reduced risk of malignant illnesses in patients on this class of drugs.[16] Thus, the present randomized controlled study set out to investigate the effects of treatment with simvastatin on serum Vitamin D in a group of dyslipidemic patients who were suitable for statin therapy.

METHODS

Study design and participants

A total of 102 male and female patients, age (20–88 old), who were not formerly receiving lipid-lowering drugs, registered from the Clinics of Ghaem Hospital, a teaching hospital located in Mashhad, Iran, between June 2010 and August 2012. The study was a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial; in this study, each patient took simvastatin or a placebo and next crossed over to the substitute. Inclusion criteria were based on the National Cholesterol Education Program-ATP III guidelines.[17] Cardiovascular risk factors were defined as age more than 65 years old, receiving antihypertensive medication or systolic blood pressure of more than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of more than 90 mmHg, fasting blood glucose (FBG) greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL, positive family history of CVD, smoking, male sex, body mass index (BMI) more than or equal to 30 kg/m2. History of malignancy, recent history of infections, connective tissue disorders, treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (e.g., corticosteroids), liver or renal disease, leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/L), thrombocytosis (platelet count >450,000 × 109/L), and anemia (hematocrit <40%) were the exclusion criteria. Each subject gave informed written consent to participate in the study, which had previously been approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (code: 88585). Each treatment period takes 1 month and there was a 14-day washout between the treatment periods. We asked the people to do not change the lifestyles during the trial also medications. At the first visit, patients were randomly assigned (random number tables) to one of the two treatment regimens. More details of the study have been published elsewhere.[5] Fifty-one patients received 40 mg/day simvastatin for 1 month, and another group (51) received a placebo (same size and color with treatment capsules and filled with starch) for 30 days. After a further 2-week washout period, the patients crossed over to the other form of treatment. The sample size was based on the between-group mean comparison formula, according to the study conducted by Hu et al. with confidence interval of 95%, and power of 80% was calculated as for at least 45 subjects for each arm.[18]

Vitamin D measurement

Serum Vitamin D levels were measured using a competitive electroluminescence protein binding assay with the Roche Diagnostics Vitamin D total assay kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The interday precision of this assay has been reported to be 4.9% and 1.9% at mean concentrations of 43.3 and 105 nmol/L, respectively, using the manufacturer's original control material.[19]

Anthropometric and biochemical evaluation

As previously described for each subject, weight, height, and BMI were measured two times (before randomization and at the end of each period observation) according to standard methods previously described.[20] Blood sampling and biochemical analyses were done as previously fully described.[20]

Statistical analysis

SAS software (version 8) (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used for statistical analysis. Data were expressed as means ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range. Value assessed for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. T-test was used for a comparison between before and after treatments. For the analysis, the mixed-model analysis of variance for cross-over studies was used. The differences of these cross-over analyses were compared; they were normally distributed. Bivariate correlations between changes in Vitamin D and biochemical parameters were assessed. P ≤ 0.05 was reflected significant. The primary end-point was the change in serum fasting lipid profile and Vitamin D after treatment for 4 weeks. The secondary endpoints were changes in fasting blood glucose and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

RESULTS

From 102 patients, who came into the trial, 25 (24.5%) dropped out; hence, the final sample size was 77 (78.2%). Noncompliance with the study protocol (n = 21), drug intolerance (n = 2), and relocation (n = 2) were the reasons for the drop-out. We failed to find any significant difference (P > 0.05) when we compared the baseline data of biochemical and anthropometric factors before the first treatment period with those before the second treatment period. Moreover, no significant difference was found for age, sex, presence of hyperlipidemia, BMI, presence of hypertension, presence of diabetes, and smoking status between the two groups [Table 1].
Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics of subjects

Comparison of baseline characteristics of subjects

Effects of simvastatin versus placebo on Vitamin D

Statin therapy did not have a significant effect on serum levels of Vitamin D in either the statin-placebo or the placebo-statin group [P = 0.90, Table 2]. Bivariate correlations were assessed between baseline values of Vitamin D and other evaluated biochemical parameters (total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], triglycerides [TGs], FBG, and hs-CRP), as well as between changes in Vitamin D and other parameters during each study period. No significant correlation was found between baseline values of Vitamin D and evaluated biochemical parameters (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between serum Vitamin D and the following parameters: FBG (statin-placebo group, second period; P < 0.01), TGs (placebo-statin group, second period; P < 0.05 and statin-placebo first period; P < 0.01), LDL-C (placebo-statin group, first period; P < 0.05), and HDL-C (statin-placebo group, first period; P < 0.05) [Table 4].
Table 2

Effect of simvastatin versus placebo on Vitamin D status

Table 3

Correlation between baseline biochemical parameters and Vitamin D in placebo-statin group and statin-placebo group

Table 4

Correlation between changes in biochemical parameters in two periods of placebo-statin group and statin-placebo

Effect of simvastatin versus placebo on Vitamin D status Correlation between baseline biochemical parameters and Vitamin D in placebo-statin group and statin-placebo group Correlation between changes in biochemical parameters in two periods of placebo-statin group and statin-placebo

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of simvastatin therapy on serum Vitamin D levels in dyslipidemic patients. Our results showed that simvastatin therapy for 4 weeks (40 mg/day) does not alter serum Vitamin D levels. Previous investigations on the impact of statin therapy on circulating Vitamin D levels have been inconsistent. While atorvastatin[21] and rosuvastatin[2223] have been shown to raise 25(OH) Vitamin D levels, there are reports with opposite findings showing that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors do not affect serum Vitamin D concentrations.[23] It is not well known how statins might affect Vitamin D concentration, and numerous potential mechanisms have been put forward.[24] The first and by far the most plausible mechanism regards to the common metabolic fate of statins and Vitamin D. Both 25(OH) Vitamin D, and statins are metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4.[24] Therefore, the occupation of the active site of this enzyme by statins may account for the elevated 25(OH) Vitamin D levels reported in some trials. Ertugrul et al. indicated that rosuvastatin (40 mg/day) as monotherapy and rosuvastatin (10 mg/day) plus fenofibrate (200 mg/day) or omega-3 fatty acids (2 g/day) cause substantial elevations in the 25(OH) Vitamin D levels (53%, 64%, and 61%, respectively).[25] Moreover, in study by Thabit et al., they found that simvastatin and atorvastatin, at any dose for duration of more than 1 year, have no additive effect on 25(OH)D level.[26] Unlike rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, no considerable change in Vitamin D concentration has been reported in patients that used fluvastatin.[23] A new randomized controlled trial could not prove an effect of 12 months simvastatin therapy (40 mg/day) on Vitamin D concentration.[27] The physicochemical characteristics of different statins may also play a role in their differential effects on Vitamin D metabolism.[2223] The present study had several limitations. First, the study design did not allow adequate time for a new steady-state level of Vitamin D, did not control or report Vitamin D intake, did not analyze for seasonal effects, and the 25(OH) Vitamin D assay was not the MS/MS gold standard. The main strength of the present study was being based on a robust placebo-controlled and cross-over design as well as being conducted in a target population, not under concomitant lipid-lowering therapy. Therefore, many of the confounding factors that may generally affect lipid alterations were eliminated from the present trial.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that statin had no significant effect on serum Vitamin D status in dyslipidemic patients. Further research might explore the effects of long-term statin therapy on Vitamin D status.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  24 in total

1.  Anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin on adipokines in type 2 diabetic patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yun Hu; Guoyu Tong; Wei Xu; Jiajia Pan; Kathy Ryan; Rongze Yang; Alan R Shuldiner; Da-Wei Gong; Dalong Zhu
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 catalyze hydroxylation of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3): implications for drug-induced osteomalacia.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Takanori Hashizume; Margaret C Shuhart; Connie L Davis; Wendel L Nelson; Toshiyuki Sakaki; Thomas F Kalhorn; Paul B Watkins; Erin G Schuetz; Kenneth E Thummel
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  National Cholesterol Education Program: report of the expert panel on the detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults.

Authors:  J H LaRosa
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1988-10

5.  Effects of Atorvastatin on vitamin D levels in patients with acute ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  José L Pérez-Castrillón; Gemma Vega; Laura Abad; Alberto Sanz; José Chaves; Gonzalo Hernandez; Antonio Dueñas
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Increased levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D after rosuvastatin treatment: a novel pleiotropic effect of statins?

Authors:  Bunyamin Yavuz; Derun Taner Ertugrul; Hicran Cil; Naim Ata; Kadir Okhan Akin; Ahmet Arif Yalcin; Metin Kucukazman; Kursad Dal; Murat Sevket Hokkaomeroglu; Burcu Balam Yavuz; Emre Tutal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population.

Authors:  Wildon R Farwell; Richard E Scranton; Elizabeth V Lawler; Robert A Lew; Mary T Brophy; Louis D Fiore; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Effects of simvastatin treatment on serum adiponectin concentrations in patients with dislipidemia.

Authors:  Atefeh Moezzi; Seyyed Mohammad Reza Parizadeh; Shima Tavallaie; Mohsen Mazidi; Fariba Afzali; Afrouz Adab; Gordon Ferns; Majid Ghayour Mobarhan
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  Total vitamin D assay comparison of the Roche Diagnostics "Vitamin D total" electrochemiluminescence protein binding assay with the Chromsystems HPLC method in a population with both D2 and D3 forms of vitamin D.

Authors:  Laila Abdel-Wareth; Afrozul Haq; Andrew Turner; Shoukat Khan; Arwa Salem; Faten Mustafa; Nafiz Hussein; Fasila Pallinalakam; Louisa Grundy; Gemma Patras; Jaishen Rajah
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on serum vitamin d and bone mineral density in hypercholesterolemic patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abrar Thabit; Abdullah Alhifany; Razan Alsheikh; Sameh Namnqani; Ameen Al-Mohammadi; Soha Elmorsy; Mohammed Qari; Mohammed Ardawi
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2014-08-13
View more
  5 in total

1.  Baseline Vitamin D Deficiency Decreases the Effectiveness of Statins in HIV-Infected Adults on Antiretroviral Therapy.

Authors:  Corrilynn O Hileman; Vin Tangpricha; Abdus Sattar; Grace A McComsey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  The impact of vitamin D supplement intake on vascular endothelial function; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mohsen Mazidi; Ehsan Karimi; Peyman Rezaie; Hassan Vatanparast
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Statins everyday versus alternate days: Is there a difference in myalgia rates?

Authors:  Ramsha Riaz; Aleena Zehra Merchant; Muhammad Salman Ul Haq; Syed Ali Raza Nasir; Yusra Rizvi; Jehanzeb Ahmed Khan; Sara Mohiuddin Zakaria; Hassaan Jawed; Khizar Hamid; Noor-Ul-Ain Zehra; Madiha Ahmed; Hussain Asif Ali; Kaneez Fatima
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-11-03

4.  Lack of association of statin use with vitamin D levels in a hospital based population of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  Khalida Iqbal; Najmul Islam; Iqbal Azam; Naseema Mehboobali; Mohammad Perwaiz Iqbal
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  The effect of self-care self-efficacy program on life satisfaction of the Iranian elderly.

Authors:  Mahnaz Shafiei Alavijeh; Zahra Zandiyeh; Mahin Moeini
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.