| Literature DB >> 27330376 |
Kalpesh C Ashara1, Jalpa S Paun1, M M Soniwala1, J R Chavda1, Vishal P Mendapara2, Nitin M Mori3.
Abstract
As compared to gel and other topical preparations microemulgel has been prepared by screening of oils, emulsifier, and co-emulsifier on bases of solubility of an API in it. An API has high solubility and oil may also have more or less pharmacological property, so it may assist the therapeutic action of API. Due to presence of oil portion, it leads to more penetration of API in the skin. Oil Micelle Size was less than 500 nm which provides more area for absorption of API in the skin so more penetration and more effective than macro-emulsion. Microemulgel has an advantage of emulgel that has dual benefits of micro-emulsion and gel and several other desirable properties like good consistency, thyrotrophic, greaseless, easily spreadable as well as removable, emollient, non-staining, water soluble, longer shelf-life, bio-friendly, transparent, pleasant appearance, ability of patients for self-medication, termination of medications will be easy, etc.Entities:
Keywords: Micro-emulsion based gel; Microemulgel
Year: 2014 PMID: 27330376 PMCID: PMC4908067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.08.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
Typical properties of Type I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV lipid formulations Pouton (1985).
| Sr. no. | Composition (%) | Type I | Type II | Type IIIA | Type IIIB | Type IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Triglycerides or mixed glycerides | 100 | 40–80 | 40–80 | <20 | – |
| 2 | Surfactant | – | 20–60 (HLB<12) | 20–40 (HLB > 11) | 20–50 (HLB > 11) | 40–80 |
| 3 | Co-surfactant Hydrophilic co-solvents | – | – | 0–40 | 20–50 | 0–50 |
| 4 | Particle size of dispersion (nm) | Coarse | 100–250 | 100–250 | 50–100 | – |
Advantages of micro-emulsion over emulsion (Holmberg et al. (2010).
| Sr. no. | Conventional (macro) emulsion | Micro-emulsion |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | Two phase system renders it thermodynamically unstable | One phase system renders it thermodynamically stable |
| 3 | Poorer long term storage stability and often tend to coalesce, creaming/sedimentation or phase separation | Better long term storage stability |
| 4 | Comparatively less bioavailability | Reduction in dose by the enhancement in bioavailability |
| 5 | Comparatively less lipophilic transport | Enhanced lymphatic transport due to lipids |
| 6 | High intra and inter subject variability | Reduced intra and inter subject variability |
| 7 | Difficult manufacturing and scale up | Easy manufacture and scale up |
| 8 | Thermodynamically unstable | Excellent kinetic stability |
| 9 | Cloudy white | Clear |
| 10 | Large input of energy for method of preparation | No large input of energy for method of preparation |
| 11 | Globule size more than 500 nm | Micelle size are 5–500 nm |
Different types of dispersions.
| Appearance | Particle size range | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Transparent | 10–140 nm | Micro-emulsion |
| Translucent | 140–200 nm | |
| Turbid | 200 nm-few microns | Emulsion |
| Presence of particle | Depended on API | Dispersion |
Ideal properties of drug candidate Shingade et al. (2012).
| Parameter | Properties |
|---|---|
| Dose | Should be low (less than 10 mg) |
| Half-life | 10 hr or less |
| Molecular weight | 400 Dalton or less |
| Partition coefficient | Log p (octanol–water) between −0.8 and 4 |
| Skin permeability coefficient | More than 0.5 × 10−3 cm/hr |
| Skin reaction | Non irritating and non-sensitizer |
| Oral bioavailability | Low |
| Therapeutic index | Low |
| Polarity | Less |
| Molecular size | Small |