Literature DB >> 27330365

Can the referring surgeon enhance accrual of breast cancer patients to medical and radiation oncology trials? The ENHANCE study.

A Arnaout1, I Kuchuk2, N Bouganim3, G Pond4, S Verma2, R Segal2, S Dent2, S Gertler2, X Song2, F Kanji5, M Clemons2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The accrual rate to clinical trials in oncology remains low. In this exploratory pilot study, we prospectively assessed the role that engaging a referring surgeon plays in enhancing nonsurgical oncologic clinical trial accrual.
METHODS: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were seen by a surgeon who actively introduced specific patient-and physician-centred strategies to increase clinical trial accrual. Patient-centred strategies included providing patients, before their oncology appointment, with information about specific clinical trials for which they might be eligible, as evaluated by the surgeon. The attitudes of the patients about clinical trials and the interventions used to improve accrual were assessed at the end of the study. The primary outcome was the clinical trial accrual rate during the study period.
RESULTS: Overall clinical trial enrolment during the study period among the 34 participating patients was 15% (5 of 34), which is greater than the institution's historical average of 7%. All patients found the information delivered by the surgeon before the oncology appointment to be very helpful. Almost three quarters of the patients (73%) were informed about clinical trials by their oncologist. The top reasons for nonparticipation reported by the patients who did not participate in clinical trials included lack of interest (35%), failure of the oncologist to mention clinical trials (33%), and inconvenience (19%).
CONCLUSIONS: Accrual of patients to clinical trials is a complex multistep process with multiple potential barriers. The findings of this exploratory pilot study demonstrate a potential role for the referring surgeon in enhancing nonsurgical clinical trial accrual.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; accrual strategies

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330365      PMCID: PMC4900848          DOI: 10.3747/co.23.2394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  14 in total

1.  To refer or not to refer: Factors that affect primary care provider referral of patients with cancer to clinical treatment trials.

Authors:  Paula R Sherwood; Barbara A Given; Aaron Scholnik; Charles W Given
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The impact of the physician on the accrual to randomized clinical trials in patients with primary operable breast cancer.

Authors:  R Kaas; A A M Hart; E J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Factors that predict the referral of breast cancer patients onto clinical trials by their surgeons and medical oncologists.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; A Zhang; N Colabianchi; C M Sturm; Q Shen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors.

Authors:  Edward J Mills; Dugald Seely; Beth Rachlis; Lauren Griffith; Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Peter Ellis; James R Wright
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Carolyn R Aldigé; Linda Krebs; Ellen Stoval
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Attitudes of primary care physicians and specialists about cancer clinical trials: a survey of Texas physicians.

Authors:  Armin D Weinberg; H Paul Cooper; Nicte I Mejia; Cynthia A Spiker
Journal:  Tex Med       Date:  2004-04

8.  Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.

Authors:  Robin Zon; Neal J Meropol; Robert B Catalano; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Barriers to clinical trial participation by older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Margaret Kemeny; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Hyman B Muss; Judith Wheeler; Ellis Levine; Nancy Bartlett; Gini Fleming; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of using a pragmatic trials model to compare two primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis regimens (ciprofloxacin versus G-CSF) in patients receiving docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer (REaCT-TC).

Authors:  Mark Clemons; Sasha Mazzarello; John Hilton; Anil Joy; Julie Price-Hiller; Xiaofu Zhu; Shailendra Verma; Anne Kehoe; Mohammed Fk Ibrahim; Marta Sienkiewicz; Carol Stober; Lisa Vandermeer; Brian Hutton; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  An Electronic Information Kiosk for Enhancing Patient Accrual for Cancer Clinical Trials: A Pilot and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Morgan D Black; Lilian Esene; Richard McClelland; Heather Mayer; Stephen Welch; Glenn Bauman; Theodore Vandenberg
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  What do patients with unmet medical needs want? A qualitative study of patients' views and experiences with expanded access to unapproved, investigational treatments in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; Nikkie Aarts
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Oncologic patients' misconceptions may impede enrollment into clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nethanel Asher; Ari Raphael; Ido Wolf; Sharon Pelles; Ravit Geva
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Randomised feasibility trial to compare three standard of care chemotherapy regimens for early stage triple-negative breast cancer (REaCT-TNBC trial).

Authors:  John Hilton; Carol Stober; Sasha Mazzarello; Lisa Vandermeer; Dean Fergusson; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.