Literature DB >> 27330249

Molecular dynamics simulations on the effect of size and shape on the interactions between negative Au18(SR)14, Au102(SR)44 and Au144(SR)60 nanoparticles in physiological saline.

Oscar D Villareal1, Roberto A Rodriguez1, Lili Yu2, Thierry O Wambo1.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations employing all-atom force fields have become a reliable way to study binding interactions quantitatively for a wide range of systems. In this work, we employ two recently developed methods for the calculation of dissociation constants KD between gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of different sizes in a near-physiological environment through the potential of mean force (PMF) formalism: the method of geometrical restraints developed by Woo et al. and formalized by Gumbart et al. and the method of hybrid Steered Molecular Dynamics (hSMD). Obtaining identical results (within the margin of error) from both approaches on the negatively charged Au18(SR)14 NP, functionalized by the negatively charged 4-mercapto-benzoate (pMBA) ligand, we draw parallels between their energetic and entropic interactions. By applying the hSMD method on Au102(SR)44 and Au144(SR)60, both of them near-spherical in shape and functionalized by pMBA, we study the effects of size and shape on the binding interactions. Au18 binds weakly with KD = 13mM as a result of two opposing effects: its large surface curvature hindering the formation of salt bridges, and its large ligand density on preferential orientations favoring their formation. On the other hand, Au102 binds more strongly with KD = 30μM and Au144 binds the strongest with KD = 3.2nM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggregation; Gold Nanoparticles; Molecular Dynamics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330249      PMCID: PMC4911198          DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.05.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp        ISSN: 0927-7757            Impact factor:   4.539


  37 in total

1.  Ligand symmetry-equivalence on thiolate protected gold nanoclusters determined by NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  O Andrea Wong; Christine L Heinecke; Ashli R Simone; Robert L Whetten; Christopher J Ackerson
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Equilibrium gold nanoclusters quenched with biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  Avinash K Murthy; Robert J Stover; Ameya U Borwankar; Golay D Nie; Sai Gourisankar; Thomas M Truskett; Konstantin V Sokolov; Keith P Johnston
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Fluctuation-driven anisotropy in effective pair interactions between nanoparticles: thiolated gold nanoparticles in ethane.

Authors:  B Shadrack Jabes; Hari O S Yadav; Sanat K Kumar; Charusita Chakravarty
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Molecular simulation of interaction between passivated gold nanoparticles in supercritical CO2.

Authors:  Ling Sun; Xiaoning Yang; Bin Wu; Lunjiang Tang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy cross-relaxation rates and ethanol distribution across membranes.

Authors:  Scott E Feller; Christopher A Brown; David T Nizza; Klaus Gawrisch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  STEM Electron Diffraction and High Resolution Images Used in the Determination of the Crystal Structure of Au144(SR)60 Cluster.

Authors:  Daniel Bahena; Nabraj Bhattarai; Ulises Santiago; Alfredo Tlahuice; Arturo Ponce; Stephan B H Bach; Bokwon Yoon; Robert L Whetten; Uzi Landman; Miguel Jose-Yacaman
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.475

9.  Biointeractions of ultrasmall glutathione-coated gold nanoparticles: effect of small size variations.

Authors:  Alioscka A Sousa; Sergio A Hassan; Luiza L Knittel; Andrea Balbo; Maria A Aronova; Patrick H Brown; Peter Schuck; Richard D Leapman
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 7.790

10.  Atomistic simulations of anionic Au144(SR)60 nanoparticles interacting with asymmetric model lipid membranes.

Authors:  Elena Heikkilä; Hector Martinez-Seara; Andrey A Gurtovenko; Ilpo Vattulainen; Jaakko Akola
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-08-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Computational Study of the Forces Driving Aggregation of Ultrasmall Nanoparticles in Biological Fluids.

Authors:  Sergio A Hassan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Computing the binding affinity of a ligand buried deep inside a protein with the hybrid steered molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Oscar D Villarreal; Lili Yu; Roberto A Rodriguez; Liao Y Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Mechanistic Understanding From Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Pharmaceutical Research 1: Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Alex Bunker; Tomasz Róg
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 4.  Biomolecular interactions of ultrasmall metallic nanoparticles and nanoclusters.

Authors:  Alioscka A Sousa; Peter Schuck; Sergio A Hassan
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-04-28

5.  Molecular dynamics insight into viscosity reduction of hydrolysed polyacrylamide by using carbon quantum dots.

Authors:  Guice Yao; Jin Zhao; Maje Alhaji Haruna; Dongsheng Wen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.361

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.