Literature DB >> 27330143

Maternal weight status, diet, and supplement use as determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Audry H Garcia1, Trudy Voortman2, Cristina P Baena2, Rajiv Chowdhurry1, Taulant Muka1, Loes Jaspers1, Samantha Warnakula1, Myrte J Tielemans1, Jenna Troup1, Wichor M Bramer1, Oscar H Franco1, Edith H van den Hooven1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Infant feeding practices are influenced by maternal factors.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to examine the associations between maternal weight status or dietary characteristics and breastfeeding or complementary feeding. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search of the Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Interventional and cohort studies in healthy mothers and infants that reported on maternal weight status, diet, or supplement use were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes assessed included delayed onset of lactogenesis; initiation, exclusivity, duration, and cessation of breastfeeding; and timing of complementary feeding. DATA ANALYSIS: Eighty-one studies were included. Maternal underweight, diet, and supplement use were not associated with infant feeding practices. Obese women had a relative risk of failure to initiate breastfeeding (risk ratio [RR] = 1.23; 95%CI, 1.03-1.47) and a delayed onset of lactogenesis (RR  =  2.06; 95%CI, 1.18-3.61). The RR for breastfeeding cessation was 1.11 (95%CI, 1.07-1.15) per increase in category of body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of obesity in women of reproductive age, as well as counseling of obese women after delivery, could be targeted to improve infant feeding practices.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; complementary feeding; meta-analysis; systematic review; weight status.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330143     DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Rev        ISSN: 0029-6643            Impact factor:   7.110


  7 in total

Review 1.  Micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy: Who, what and how much?

Authors:  F Parisi; I di Bartolo; V M Savasi; I Cetin
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2018-05-04

2.  Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #2: Guidelines for Birth Hospitalization Discharge of Breastfeeding Dyads, Revised 2022.

Authors:  Adrienne E Hoyt-Austin; Laura R Kair; Ilse A Larson; Elizabeth K Stehel
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.335

3.  Mismatch between obesogenic intrauterine environment and low-fat postnatal diet may confer offspring metabolic advantage.

Authors:  Sezen Kislal; William Jin; Claire Maesner; Andrea G Edlow
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Infant Feeding Practices In a Diverse Group of Women: The Healthy Start Study.

Authors:  Jill Landsbaugh Kaar; Katherine A Sauder; Allison Lb Shapiro; Anne P Starling; Brandy M Ringham; Susan L Johnson; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-20

5.  Effects of Launaea taraxacifolia and resveratrol on milk yield and serum prolactin and oxytocin levels: a lactogenic study.

Authors:  Na'imatu A Sani; Mohammed U Kawu; Ibrahim G Bako
Journal:  Int J Vet Sci Med       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Using the behaviour change wheel to explore infant feeding peer support provision; insights from a North West UK evaluation.

Authors:  Gill Thomson; Nicola Crossland
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.461

7.  Relationship between Maternal Body Mass Index and Obstetric and Perinatal Complications.

Authors:  Ana Ballesta-Castillejos; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Julián Rodríguez-Almagro; Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas; Antonio Hernández-Martínez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.