Cathal McCrory1, Lisa F Berkman2, Hugh Nolan2, Neil O'Leary2, Margaret Foley2, Rose Anne Kenny2. 1. From the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (C.M.C., H.N., N.O.L., M.F., A.K.) and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA (L.F.B.). mccrorc@tcd.ie. 2. From the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (C.M.C., H.N., N.O.L., M.F., A.K.) and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA (L.F.B.).
Abstract
RATIONALE: Speed of heart rate recovery (HRR) may serve as an important biomarker of aging and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the speed of HRR after an orthostatic maneuver (ie, active stand from supine position) predicts mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A longitudinal cohort study involving a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older individuals aged ≥50 years. A total of 4475 participants completed an active stand at baseline as part of a detailed clinic-based cardiovascular assessment. Beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure responses to standing were measured during a 2-minute window using a finometer and binned in 10-s intervals. We modeled HRR to the stand by age group, cardiovascular disease burden, and mortality status using a random effects model. Mortality status during a mean follow-up duration of 4.3 years served as the primary end point (n=138). Speed of HRR in the immediate 20 s after standing was a strong predictor of mortality. A 1-bpm slower HRR between 10 and 20 s after standing increased the hazard of mortality by 6% controlling for established risk factors. A clear dose-response relationship was evident. Sixty-nine participants in the slowest HRR quartile died during the observation period compared with 14 participants in the fastest HRR quartile. Participants in the slowest recovery quartile were 2.3× more likely to die compared with those in the fastest recovery quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Speed of orthostatic HRR predicts mortality and may aid clinical decision making. Attenuated orthostatic HRR may reflect dysregulation of the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.
RATIONALE: Speed of heart rate recovery (HRR) may serve as an important biomarker of aging and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the speed of HRR after an orthostatic maneuver (ie, active stand from supine position) predicts mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A longitudinal cohort study involving a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older individuals aged ≥50 years. A total of 4475 participants completed an active stand at baseline as part of a detailed clinic-based cardiovascular assessment. Beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure responses to standing were measured during a 2-minute window using a finometer and binned in 10-s intervals. We modeled HRR to the stand by age group, cardiovascular disease burden, and mortality status using a random effects model. Mortality status during a mean follow-up duration of 4.3 years served as the primary end point (n=138). Speed of HRR in the immediate 20 s after standing was a strong predictor of mortality. A 1-bpm slower HRR between 10 and 20 s after standing increased the hazard of mortality by 6% controlling for established risk factors. A clear dose-response relationship was evident. Sixty-nine participants in the slowest HRR quartile died during the observation period compared with 14 participants in the fastest HRR quartile. Participants in the slowest recovery quartile were 2.3× more likely to die compared with those in the fastest recovery quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Speed of orthostatic HRR predicts mortality and may aid clinical decision making. Attenuated orthostatic HRR may reflect dysregulation of the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.
Authors: Julian M Stewart; Archana Kota; Mary Breige O'Donnell-Smith; Paul Visintainer; Courtney Terilli; Marvin S Medow Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-07-23
Authors: Mark P M Harms; Ciáran Finucane; Laura Pérez-Denia; Stephen P Juraschek; Veera K van Wijnen; Lewis A Lipsitz; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wouter Wieling Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Ciarán Finucane; V K van Wijnen; C W Fan; C Soraghan; L Byrne; B E Westerhof; R Freeman; A Fedorowski; M P M Harms; W Wieling; R Kenny Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Peter H Charlton; Panicos A Kyriaco; Jonathan Mant; Vaidotas Marozas; Phil Chowienczyk; Jordi Alastruey Journal: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 10.961
Authors: Andreas Caduff; Mattia Zanon; Pavel Zakharov; Martin Mueller; Mark Talary; Achim Krebs; Werner A Stahel; Marc Donath Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2018-01-14
Authors: Bruce D Nearing; Imad Libbus; Gerrard M Carlson; Badri Amurthur; Bruce H KenKnight; Richard L Verrier Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.435