| Literature DB >> 27329937 |
Malachi Ochieng Arunda1, Vikas Choudhry2, Björn Ekman2, Benedict Oppong Asamoah2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mortality among children under five remains a significant health challenge across sub-Saharan Africa. HIV/AIDS is one of the leading contributors to the relatively slow decline in under-five mortality in this region. In Tanzania, HIV prevalence among under-five children is high and 90% of all infections are due to mother-to-child transmission.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; antiretroviral therapy; cross-sectional design; logistic regression; prevention of mother-to-child transmission; under-five mortality
Year: 2016 PMID: 27329937 PMCID: PMC4916291 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v9.31676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Distribution of background and maternal characteristics of under-five children, by under-five mortality status in Tanzania between 2003 and 2012 (95% confidence limit)
| 2003–2004 | 2007–2008 | 2011–2012 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality, | Mortality, | Mortality, | |||||||
| Baseline characteristics | Yes (%) | No (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) | |||
| Maternal HIV status | |||||||||
| HIV positive | 48.9 | 51.1 | <0.01 | 11.6 | 88.4 | <0.01 | 5.6 | 94.4 | <0.01 |
| HIV negative | 32.0 | 68.0 | 3.5 | 96.5 | 2.5 | 97.5 | |||
| Maternal age | ( | ( | ( | ||||||
| 15–24 | 16.2 | 83.8 | <0.01 | 4.0 | 96.0 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 96.9 | 0.50 |
| 25–34 | 36.9 | 63.1 | 3.4 | 96.6 | 2.4 | 97.6 | |||
| 35–49 | 60.6 | 39.4 | 4.7 | 95.3 | 2.5 | 97.5 | |||
| Place of residence | |||||||||
| Rural | 35.1 | 64.9 | <0.01 | 3.7 | 96.3 | 0.03 | 2.5 | 97.5 | 0.1 |
| Urban | 23.4 | 76.6 | 5.3 | 94.7 | 3.4 | 96.6 | |||
| Education | |||||||||
| No education | 43.0 | 57.0 | <0.01 | 3.8 | 96.2 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 97.7 | 0.4 |
| Primary | 30.6 | 69.4 | 4.2 | 95.8 | 3.7 | 96.3 | |||
| Secondary | 12.2 | 87.8 | 3 | 97 | 3.3 | 96.7 | |||
| Marital status | |||||||||
| Single | 13.2 | 86.8 | <0.01 | 5.3 | 94.7 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 97.1 | 0.8 |
| Married | 34.5 | 65.5 | 96.1 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 93.4 | |||
| Wealth status | |||||||||
| Poor | 39.4 | 60.6 | <0.01 | 3.5 | 96.5 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 97.3 | <0.01 |
| Middle | 34.4 | 65.6 | 3.5 | 96.5 | 1.4 | 98.6 | |||
| Wealthy | 23.1 | 76.9 | 4.5 | 95.5 | 3.3 | 96.7 | |||
| Parity | |||||||||
| Nulliparous | 5.7 | 94.3 | <0.01 | 4.7 | 95.3 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 96.4 | 0.2 |
| Para 1–3 | 26.3 | 73.7 | 3.8 | 96.2 | 2.7 | 97.3 | |||
| Para 4+ | 62.8 | 27.6 | 3.8 | 96.2 | 2.2 | 97.8 | |||
| Clean water | |||||||||
| No | 36.3 | 63.7 | <0.01 | 4.0 | 96.0 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 97.7 | 0.4 |
| Yes | 23.7 | 76.3 | 3.6 | 96.4 | 2.7 | 97.3 | |||
| Mean age | 27.6 | 29.4 | 29.5 | ||||||
Statistical significance (p<0.05, two-sided).
access to clean drinking water
Represents maternal age at birth.
Distribution of background characteristics of under-five children, by maternal HIV status in Tanzania between 2003 and 2012 (95% confidence limit)
| 2003–2004 ( | 2007–2008 ( | 2011–2012 ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | HIV+ | HIV− | HIV+ | HIV− | HIV+ | HIV− | |||
| Place of residence | |||||||||
| Urban | 53 (40.5) | 419 (18.7) | <0.01 | 67 (29.9) | 720 (16.4) | <0.01 | 73 (29.1) | 720 (16.4) | <0.01 |
| Rural | 78 (59.5) | 1,821 (81.3) | 157 (70.1) | 3,681 (83.6) | 178 (70.9) | 3,681 (83.6) | |||
| Education | |||||||||
| No education | 19 (14.5) | 516 (23.0) | <0.01 | 39 (17.4) | 1,192 (27.1) | <0.01 | 40 (15.9) | 1,186 (22.4) | <0.01 |
| Primary | 101 (77.1) | 1,641 (73.3) | 169 (75.5) | 2,758 (62.7) | 190 (75.7) | 3,435 (64.8) | |||
| Secondary/higher | 11 (8.4) | 83 (3.7) | 16 (7.1) | 451 (10.2) | 21 (8.4) | 680 (12.8) | |||
| Maternal age | |||||||||
| 15–24 | 43 (32.8) | 895 (39.9) | 0.1 | 67 (29.9) | 1,313 (29.8) | 0.5 | 53 (21.8) | 1,189 (24.2) | 0.04 |
| 25–34 | 69 (52.7) | 969 (43.3) | 104 (46.4) | 1,908 (43.4) | 133 (54.7) | 2,284 (46.6) | |||
| 35–49 | 19 (14.5) | 376 (16.8) | 53 (23.7) | 1,180 (26.8) | 57 (23.5) | 1,433 (29.2) | |||
| Marital status | |||||||||
| Single | 17 (13) | 194 (8.7) | 0.09 | 14 (6.2) | 211 (4.8) | 0.3 | 18 (7.9) | 211 (4.8) | 0.7 |
| Married | 144 (87) | 2,046 (91.3) | 210 (93.8) | 4,190 (95.2) | 210 (92.1) | 4,190 (95.2) | |||
| Wealth status | |||||||||
| Poor | 41 (31.3) | 1,044 (46.6) | <0.01 | 87 (52.1) | 1,698 (47.1) | 0.4 | 87 (34.7) | 2,214 (41.8) | <0.01 |
| Middle class | 22 (16.8) | 447 (20) | 36 (21.6) | 896 (24.9) | 45 (17.9) | 1,080 (20.4) | |||
| Wealthy | 68 (51.9) | 749 (33.4) | 44 (26.3) | 1,011 (28.0) | 119 (47.4) | 2,007 (37.9) | |||
| Clean water | |||||||||
| No | 35 (34.7) | 1,108 (54.1) | <0.01 | 82 (39.8) | 1,750 (42.0) | 0.5 | 105 (47.7) | 2,210 (48.0) | 0.9 |
| Yes | 66 (65.3) | 939 (45.9) | 124 (60.2) | 2,420 (58.0) | 115 (52.3) | 2,396 (52.0) | |||
X2p value – Pearson's chi-square test of independence. Statistically significant observation (p<0.05, two-sided).
refers to drinking water.
Binomial logistic regression analysis of the association between under-five mortality and exposure to maternal HIV-positive status among Tanzanian children between 2003 and 2012; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) (95% confidence interval)
| 2003–2004 ( | 2007–2008 ( | 2011–2012 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |||
| Maternal HIV status | ||||||
| HIV positive | 1.5 (1.1–1.9) | <0.01 | 4.6 (2.7–7.8) | <0.01 | 2.4 (1.2–4.6) | <0.01 |
| HIV negative | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Place of residence | ||||||
| Rural | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | 0.04 | 0.9 (0.5–1.6) | 1.0 | 0.9 (0.5–1.6) | 0.4 |
| Urban | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Education level | ||||||
| No education | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | <0.01 | 0.6 (0.2–1.6) | 0.2 | 1.2 (0.6–2.6) | 0.3 |
| Primary education | 0.3 (0.1–1.0) | 0.1 | 0.6 (0.2–1.6) | 0.2 | 1.0 (0.5–1.8) | 0.9 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 0.8 (0.4–1.6) | 0.4 | 0.6 (0.2–1.6) | 0.3 | 0.6 (0.2–1.8) | 0.5 |
| Married | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Wealth status | ||||||
| Poor | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | 0.1 | 1.6 (1.0–2.5) | 0.04 | 1.1 (0.7–1.9) | 0.6 |
| Middle class | 0.8 (0.5–1.1) | 0.1 | 1.7 (0.9–2.8) | 0.51 | 2.7 (1.2–5.7) | 0.01 |
| Maternal age | ||||||
| 15–24 | 1.8 (1.3–2.5) | <0.01 | 0.9 (0.5–1.5) | 0.5 | 0.8 (0.5–1.3) | 0.4 |
| 35–49 | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | <0.01 | 0.7 (0.5–1.2) | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.5–1.5) | 0.7 |
| Parity | ||||||
| Para 1–3 | 0.4 (0.2–0.7) | <0.01 | 1.4 (0.8–2.5) | 0.5 | 1.1 (0.6–2.1) | 0.5 |
| Para 4+ | 0.1 (0.03–0.14) | <0.01 | 1.4 (0.7–2.9) | 0.7 | 1.3 (0.6–2.7) | 0.5 |
| Clean drinking water | ||||||
| No | 1.7 (1.3–2.1) | <0.01 | 1.4 (0.9–2.1) | 0.7 | 0.7 (0.5–1.5) | 0.6 |
| Yes | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
Adjusted for all variables in the table. Reference groups:
secondary/higher education
wealth,
age group 25–34,
nulliparous.
HIV/AIDS-attributable mortality risk fraction among exposed under-five children and in the entire under-five population in Tanzania
| Survey year | Attributable risk fraction (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| For children of infected mothers | ||
| 2003–2004 | 33.3 | |
| 2007–2008 | 78.3 | |
| 2011–2012 | 58.3 | |
| In the entire population | ||
| 2003–2004 | 3.7 | |
| 2007–2008 | 11.3 | |
| 2011–2012 | 5.6 |
Fig. 1Trends of HIV/AIDS-attributable risk percent of under-five mortality between 2003 and 2012, among children exposed to HIV and in the entire Tanzanian population.
| Variable | Categorization | Description/composition |
|---|---|---|
| Under-five mortality | Yes (dead) | Died at age <5 years |
| No (alive) | Alive at age ≥5 years | |
|
| ||
| Maternal HIV status | HIV positive | |
| HIV negative | ||
| Maternal education | Uneducated | No formal education |
| Primary | ≤9 years of education | |
| Secondary or higher | ≥9 years of education | |
| Marital status | Single | Never married, separated, widowed, or divorced and not living together |
| Married | Married or cohabiting at the time of death | |
| Maternal age (years) | 15–24 | |
| 25–34 | ||
| 35–49 | ||
| Place of residence | Rural | |
| Urban | ||
| Parity | Nulliparous | First-time child-bearers |
| Para 1–3 | 1–3 births | |
| Para 4+ | 4+ births | |
| Wealth status | Poor | Included poor and the poorest |
| Middle | Middle income | |
| Wealthy | Wealthy and the wealthiest | |
| Access to clean water | Yes | Piped, rain, protected sources |
| No | Rivers, unprotected sources | |