Claire Nogic1, Julie Belousoff2,3, David Krieser2,4. 1. School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Australia. 2. Emergency Department, Sunshine Hospital, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the diagnosis and management of children with anaphylaxis presenting to an Emergency Department (ED). We compared the management with the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) guidelines to gauge compliance. METHODS: A retrospective case series was developed from children aged from birth to 16 years presenting to the ED at Sunshine Hospital (SH) in Melbourne, Australia over a 2-year period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. The demographic characteristics, causative agents, clinical features, treatment administered and discharge destination were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-five children diagnosed with anaphylaxis during the 2-year period were identified. Fifty-two children (95%) met the ASCIA diagnostic criteria, 49 (94%) children received adrenaline. The median age of presentation was five years, with males predominating (32 (62%)). The most common setting was home (35 (67%)), and food (39 (75%)) was the most common causative agent. Cutaneous symptoms (50 (96%)) were the most prevalent. Twenty-eight (54%) children received adrenaline prior to arrival in ED, whilst 22 (42%) received adrenaline in the ED. Thirty-three (63%) children were discharged home. CONCLUSION: Childhood anaphylaxis commonly presents to the ED. More than half of children presenting with anaphylaxis were treated prior to attending the ED. The findings demonstrate that anaphylaxis diagnosis and management guidelines are being adhered to in the majority of cases. There were no adverse outcomes recorded.
AIM: To investigate the diagnosis and management of children with anaphylaxis presenting to an Emergency Department (ED). We compared the management with the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) guidelines to gauge compliance. METHODS: A retrospective case series was developed from children aged from birth to 16 years presenting to the ED at Sunshine Hospital (SH) in Melbourne, Australia over a 2-year period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. The demographic characteristics, causative agents, clinical features, treatment administered and discharge destination were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-five children diagnosed with anaphylaxis during the 2-year period were identified. Fifty-two children (95%) met the ASCIA diagnostic criteria, 49 (94%) children received adrenaline. The median age of presentation was five years, with males predominating (32 (62%)). The most common setting was home (35 (67%)), and food (39 (75%)) was the most common causative agent. Cutaneous symptoms (50 (96%)) were the most prevalent. Twenty-eight (54%) children received adrenaline prior to arrival in ED, whilst 22 (42%) received adrenaline in the ED. Thirty-three (63%) children were discharged home. CONCLUSION: Childhood anaphylaxis commonly presents to the ED. More than half of children presenting with anaphylaxis were treated prior to attending the ED. The findings demonstrate that anaphylaxis diagnosis and management guidelines are being adhered to in the majority of cases. There were no adverse outcomes recorded.
Authors: Sandra M Salter; Ross J Marriott; Kevin Murray; Samantha L Stiles; Paul Bailey; Raymond J Mullins; Frank M Sanfilippo Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Heinrich C Weber; Gaylene L Bassett; Laura K Hollingsworth; Vincent Ws Gan; Samantha Rose; Jacqueline Lim; Sarah J Prior Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Nandinee Patel; Kok Wee Chong; Alexander Y G Yip; Despo Ierodiakonou; Joan Bartra; Robert J Boyle; Paul J Turner Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 10.793