| Literature DB >> 27329770 |
Cécile Gallea1, Traian Popa2, Daniel García-Lorenzo3, Romain Valabregue3, André-Pierre Legrand4, Emmanuelle Apartis5, Lea Marais3, Bertrand Degos6, Cecile Hubsch6, Sara Fernández-Vidal2, Eric Bardinet2, Emmanuel Roze6, Stéphane Lehéricy3, Sabine Meunier7, Marie Vidailhet6.
Abstract
SEE MUTHURAMAN ET AL DOI101093/AWW164 FOR A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY ON THIS ARTICLE: Primary orthostatic tremor is characterized by high frequency tremor affecting the legs and trunk during the standing position. Cerebellar defects were suggested in orthostatic tremor without direct evidence. We aimed to characterize the anatomo-functional defects of the cerebellar motor pathways in orthostatic tremor. We used multimodal neuroimaging to compare 17 patients with orthostatic tremor and 17 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Nine of the patients with orthostatic tremor underwent repetitive transcranial stimulation applied over the cerebellum during five consecutive days. We quantified the duration of standing position and tremor severity through electromyographic recordings. Compared to healthy volunteers, grey matter volume in patients with orthostatic tremor was (i) increased in the cerebellar vermis and correlated positively with the duration of the standing position; and (ii) increased in the supplementary motor area and decreased in the lateral cerebellum, which both correlated with the disease duration. Functional connectivity between the lateral cerebellum and the supplementary motor area was abnormally increased in patients with orthostatic tremor, and correlated positively with tremor severity. After repetitive transcranial stimulation, tremor severity and functional connectivity between the lateral cerebellum and the supplementary motor area were reduced. We provide an explanation for orthostatic tremor pathophysiology, and demonstrate the functional relevance of cerebello-thalamo-cortical connections in tremor related to cerebellar defects.Entities:
Keywords: cerebellar function; frontal lobe; motor cortex; movement disorder; tremor
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27329770 PMCID: PMC4958903 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Characteristics of the patients
| Age (y) | Age at onset (y) | FAB | Duration of upright position | F | W | A | Medication | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TO1 | 74 | 64 | 28 | 120 | 14.34 | 0.295 | 8.16 | No |
| TO2 | 71 | 52 | 35 | 330 | 16.75 | 0.325 | 3.015 | Rivotryl |
| TO3 | 69 | 52 | 28 | 150 | 16.2 | 0.4 | 1.55 | Rivotryl |
| TO4 | 62 | 53 | 27 | 65 | 14.08 | 0.31 | 0.035 | Rivotryl |
| TO5 | 52 | 42 | 24 | 55 | 17.7 | 0.4 | 6.2 | Rivotryl |
| TO6 | 60 | 49 | 25 | 0 | 13.555 | 0.295 | 1.935 | No |
| TO7 | 58 | 42 | 28 | 84 | 16.125 | 0.335 | 2.48 | Rivotril |
| TO8 | 58 | 44 | 19 | 14 | 17.885 | 0.47 | 0.35 | Rivotril |
| TO9 | 79 | 62 | 24 | 111 | 15.64 | 0.32 | 1.5 | Rivotril |
| TO10 | 78 | 44 | 29 | 90 | 16.885 | 0.378 | 0.142 | Rivotril |
| TO11 | 67 | 56 | 31 | 83 | 15.288 | 0.518 | 1.016 | No |
| TO12 | 66 | 61 | 16 | 35 | 17.169 | 0.710 | 1.150 | Rivotril |
| TO13 | 38 | 27 | 34 | 180 | 16.120 | 0.291 | 0.358 | No |
| TO14 | 60 | 51 | 17 | 120 | 16.440 | 0.485 | 2.948 | No |
| TO15 | 68 | 67 | 33 | 210 | 14.102 | 0.555 | 1.167 | Rivotril |
| TO16 | 47 | 39 | 38 | 187 | 15.714 | 0.319 | 0.237 | Rivotril |
| TO17 | 77 | 70 | 23 | 285 | 17.199 | 0.562 | 0.848 | Rivotril |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SD | 10.871 | 10.895 | 6.019 | 88.052 | 1.273 | 0.117 | 2.137 |
W = width of the power spectrum; A = area under the curve; F = frequency peak value; SD = standard deviation.
Figure 1Group differences in voxel-based morphometry. Statistical parametric maps of the comparison between patients and healthy volunteers, showing (clusters are significant at P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster level) decreased grey matter (GM) volume in the cerebellum (A) and increased grey matter volume in both SMAs and superior cerebellar vermis (B). HV = healthy volunteer; OT = orthostatic tremor.
Anatomical location of clusters displayed in Figs 1–3 with detailed statistics
| Anatomical localization of clusters | Coordinates of global maxima [ |
| Ke | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, preSMA, SMA proper) | 15 3 62 | 3.78 | 157 |
| R | Vermis 7 | 8 −67 −26 | 3.43 | 2131 |
| B | Vermis 4,5 | 3 −51 −3 | 3.01 | |
|
| ||||
| R | Cerebellum, lateral lobule VI | 34 −48 −39 | 3.22 | 677 |
| L | Cerebellum, lateral lobule VI | −38 −43 −33 | 3.06 | 66 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| B | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, preSMA, SMA proper) | −15 9 54 | 4.93 | 777 |
| R | Dentate nucleus | 15 −66 −35 | 4.29 | 377 |
| L | Dentate nucleus | −12 −64 −36 | 3.96 | 213 |
|
| ||||
| B | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IX, vermis VIII and IX | 8 −52 −54 | 5.63 | 1517 |
| L | Cerebellum, lateral lobule VI | −20 −61 −23 | 4.48 | 930 |
| B | Cerebellum, vermis VI | 3 −75 −21 | 4.47 | 289 |
| R | Cerebellum lateral lobule VI | 22 −58 −24 | 4.24 | 825 |
|
| ||||
| L | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IV | −18 −36 −18 | 6.65 | 257 |
| R | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IV | 8 −49 −2 | 5.34 | 82 |
| L | Cerebellum, lateral lobule VI | −33 −52 −35 | 3.77 | 83 |
|
| ||||
| R | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IX | 12 −48 −47 | 6.08 | 375 |
| B | Cerebellum, lobule IV, vermis III and IV | 9 −46 −12 | 5.42 | 352 |
| B | Cerebellum, vermis VI | 2 −67 −15 | 4.13 | 352 |
|
| ||||
| B | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 3 0 55 | 3.19 | 172 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| R | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IX | 9 −45 −48 | 4.14 | 327 |
| L | Cerebellum, lateral lobule IX | −10 −50 −39 | 3.77 | 448 |
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 16 −8 66 | 3.67 | 706 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | −6 −16 64 | 3.67 | 876 |
| B | Cerebellum, vermis III, IV, V | −3 −42 −9 | 3.66 | 907 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 12 −9 56 | 3.29 | 237 |
|
| ||||
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 12 −22 56 | 5.92 | 142 |
| R | Cerebellum, lobule IV and V | 10 −54 −22 | 5.83 | 1497 |
| L | Cerebellum, lobule IV and V | −6 −52 −18 | 5.64 | |
| B | Cerebellum, vermis VIII | −3 −64 −40 | 5.70 | 146 |
| L | Paracentral lobule, foot area (BA 4) | −14 −36 −63 | 4.34 | 106 |
GM = grey matter; Bilat = bilateral; R = right; L = left; BA = Brodmann area; Ke = cluster volume (in number of voxels); OT = orthostatic tremor; HV = healthy volunteers; SUR = stand upright. Global maxima without cluster volume are included in the cluster above.
Figure 2Correlation of VBM changes with clinical scores and tremor severity. (A and B) Multiple regression showing that grey matter volume in the cerebellum correlated negatively with disease duration (blue) and positively with clinical scores [SUR = stand upright station (yellow), FAB = Fullerton Assessment of Balance (magenta)]. (C) Multiple regression showing that grey matter volume in the SMA correlated positively with disease duration (red) and tremor characteristics (green). A = area of the tremor power spectrum measured from EMG recordings). The clusters are superimposed on the SPM canonical brain. The cerebral parameters (individual values) showing the correlations with clinical parameters were calculated voxel-by-voxel in the regions of interest of cerebello-thalamo-cortical network (see regions of interest definition). Graphics are used as a display to report data dispersion and the direction of the correlation. GM = grey matter.
Figure 3Group differences in ALFF and correlation of ALFF with clinical scores and tremor severity. (A) Statistical parametric maps showing the increase in ALFF in both SMA and superior cerebellar vermis of the patients with orthostatic tremor as compared with the healthy controls (clusters are significant at P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). (B) Multiple regression showing that ALFF in the SMA correlated with clinical scores (yellow) and tremor characteristics (green). Clusters are superimposed on the SPM canonical brain. Plots show the correlation between the global maximum in SMA (see Table 2 for statistical details and MNI coordinates). The cerebral parameters (individual values) showing the correlations with clinical parameters were calculated voxel-by-voxel in the regions of interest of cerebellar- motor circuit (see definition of regions of interest). (C) ALFF extracted from cerebellar clusters with lower and/or upper limb representation. Yellow–red = regions of lower limb representation (lobule IV and IX). Blue = regions of upper limb representation (lobule V and VIII). Purple = regions of complex representations of both lower and upper limbs (lobule VI). Graphs represent the average ALFF in each group (light = healthy volunteers, dark = patients with orthostatic tremor). Asterisks represent a significant group difference at P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. NS = non-significant; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; IV = cerebellar lobule IV; V = cerebellar lobule V; VI = cerebellar lobule VI; VIII = cerebellar lobule VIII; IX = cerebellar lobule IX; OT = orthostatic tremor; ROI = region of interest; SUR = stand upright station.
Figure 4Results of functional connectivity of cerebellar motor networks. (A) Increased functional connectivity between the cerebellar lobule VI and both the lower limb representation of M1 and the SMA in patients with orthostatic tremor (OT) compared to healthy volunteers (HV) displayed on the SPM canonical brain (top) and represented graphically (bottom). (B) Multiple regression results showing that functional connectivity between the cerebellum VI and the SMA correlated with tremor characteristics on the SPM canonical brain (top) and represented graphically (bottom). All group differences and multiple regression results are significant at P < 0.05 corrected at the level of the cluster. Clusters are superimposed on the SPM canonical brain. Plots display the dispersion of data points extracted from the global maximum (see Table 3 for statistical details).
Anatomical location of clusters displayed in Figs 4–5 with detailed statistics
| Anatomical localization of clusters | Coordinates of global maxima [ |
| Ke | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| L | Medial precentral gyrus, paracentral lobule (BA 4,3,1, M1 foot area) | −4 −32 68 | 5.40 | 160 |
| R | Medial precentral gyrus, paracentral lobule (BA 4,3,1, M1 foot area) | 4 −22 69 | 4.30 | |
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 12 −4 72 | 5.29 | 25 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, preSMA) | −10 6 72 | 4.77 | 43 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, preSMA) | −6 20 58 | 5.88 | 106 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | −10 −14 68 | 5.66 | 93 |
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 10 −16 62 | 5.65 | 258 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| R | Paracentral lobule, medial postcentral gyrus (BA 3,2,1), medial precentral gyrus (BA 4, M1 foot area) | 2 −44 62 | 8.11 | 1316 |
| R | Precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 12 −8 72 | 6.93 | |
| B | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 0 −0 57 | 6.91 | |
| L | Precentral gyrus (BA 4, M1 foot area) | −14 −33 70 | 6.62 | 82 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| L | Precentral/postcentral gyrus (BA 4,3, M1 foot area) | −16 −34 69 | 7.21 | 46 |
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 14 −20 54 | 6.20 | 39 |
| R | Precentral/postcentral gyrus (BA 4,3, M1 foot area) | 6 −42 68 | 5.99 | 147 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | −9 −8 56 | 5.30 | 60 |
|
| ||||
| R | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | 14 −6 52 | 16.35 | 49 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | −12 −4 64 | 10.63 | 375 |
| L | Medial precentral gyrus (BA 6, SMA proper) | −3 −4 50 | 7.98 | 75 |
| R | Precentral/postcentral gyrus (BA 4,3, M1 foot area) | 6 −26 74 | 7.54 | 38 |
Bilat = bilateral, R = right, L = left, BA = Brodmann area. Ke = cluster volume (number of voxels); FC = functional connectivity; rTMS = repetitive TMS; OT = orthostatic tremor; HV = healthy volunteers. Global maxima without cluster volume are included in the cluster above.
Figure 5Results of functional connectivity of cerebellar motor networks for the open label trial with repetitive TMS of the cerebellum. (A) Effect of repetitive TMS on the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of tremor. Asterisks represent a significant effect of repetitive TMS between Day 26 and baseline. (B) Compared to baseline, patients with orthostatic tremor had a decrease of functional connectivity (FC) after repetitive TMS (rTMS) treatment between the bilateral cerebellar lobule VI and both the lower limb representation in M1 and the SMA. Group differences are significant at P < 0.05 corrected at the level of the cluster. (C) Multiple regression showing that functional connectivity between the cerebellum VI and the SMA correlated with tremor characteristics positively at baseline (green) but negatively at Day 26 (cyan). This correlation was not significant at Day 5 (grey). Clusters are superimposed on the SPM canonical brain. Plots show the data dispersion and the direction of the correlation (see Table 3 for statistical details and MNI coordinates).