| Literature DB >> 27329702 |
Miki Yamaguchi1, Haruka Fujimoto1, Ko Hirano1, Satoko Araki-Nakamura1, Kozue Ohmae-Shinohara1, Akihiro Fujii1, Masako Tsunashima2, Xian Jun Song1, Yusuke Ito1, Rie Nagae1, Jianzhong Wu3, Hiroshi Mizuno3, Jun-Ichi Yonemaru3, Takashi Matsumoto3, Hidemi Kitano1, Makoto Matsuoka1, Shigemitsu Kasuga4, Takashi Sazuka1.
Abstract
Semi-dwarfing genes have contributed to enhanced lodging resistance, resulting in increased crop productivity. In the history of grain sorghum breeding, the spontaneous mutation, dw1 found in Memphis in 1905, was the first widely used semi-dwarfing gene. Here, we report the identification and characterization of Dw1. We performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis and cloning, and revealed that Dw1 encodes a novel uncharacterized protein. Knockdown or T-DNA insertion lines of orthologous genes in rice and Arabidopsis also showed semi-dwarfism similar to that of a nearly isogenic line (NIL) carrying dw1 (NIL-dw1) of sorghum. A histological analysis of the NIL-dw1 revealed that the longitudinal parenchymal cell lengths of the internode were almost the same between NIL-dw1 and wildtype, while the number of cells per internode was significantly reduced in NIL-dw1. NIL-dw1dw3, carrying both dw1 and dw3 (involved in auxin transport), showed a synergistic phenotype. These observations demonstrate that the dw1 reduced the cell proliferation activity in the internodes, and the synergistic effect of dw1 and dw3 contributes to improved lodging resistance and mechanical harvesting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27329702 PMCID: PMC4916599 DOI: 10.1038/srep28366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1QTL analysis of CL.
(a) Plant stature of two cultivars used in this study; (Left) Three-dwarf cultivar carrying three dwarfing genes, bmr-6, and (Right) zero-dwarf cultivar carrying no dwarfing genes, SIL-05. Bar = 1 m. (b) An elongation pattern of internodes. Bar = 1 m. (c) The enlarged views of the basal regions of (b). Bar = 10 cm. (d) Distribution frequency of CL among 185 F2 plants from a cross between bmr-6 and SIL-05. Phenotypic values for bmr-6 and SIL-05 are indicated by arrowheads. (e) QTL analysis of CL using 96 F2 plants. Only chromosomes 6, 7, and 9, which had log-likelihood value (LOD) score > 3, were presented. The positions and names of the DNA markers used for the analysis are indicated at the left and right sides, respectively. Red ellipses indicate the positions of the QTLs for CL. Boxes contain, in order, the QTL name (bold and underlined), LOD score (bold), percentage of variance-explained, and additive effect, a positive value indicates that the allele from SIL-05 increases CL.
QTLs for CL identified in the F2 population of a crossing between bmr-6 and SIL-05.
| QTL | Chr. | Nearest markers | LOD | PVE | a | DOM | d/a | DPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | SB3484 | 6.09 | 26.0 | 60.7 | 37.9 | 0.62 | SIL-05 | |
| 7 | SSR3_4143 | 7.01 | 35.8 | 60.2 | 69.7 | 1.16 | SIL-05 | |
| 9 | SSR2_5041 | 3.77 | 17.6 | 45.2 | 29.7 | 0.66 | SIL-05 |
aLOD threshold = 3.0.
bPercentage of Variance-explained; Percent of total phenotypic variation explained by the QTLs.
cAdditive effects are associated with the SIL-05 allele.
dDominance effect in the Het.
eDirection of phenotypic effect is the parent whose additive value of a marker allele increased the trait value.
Figure 2Positional cloning and Phenotypic complementation of the corresponding gene of qCL-9.
(a) High-resolution physical map of qCL-9. On the upper horizontal line, vertical lines indicate the positions of DNA markers with their physical positions (Mb) in Phytozome ver.9.1 (Sorghum bicolor ver.1.4). Numbers of recombinants are shown between markers. The number of progeny examined in the next generation is presented in parentheses. Arrowheads indicate the physical positions of the DNA markers used in Table 2. The middle horizontal line is a schematic representation of the gene arrangement near the candidate region, which was predicted by the BAC sequence of SIL-05. Open arrows indicate the positions of predicted genes. The mapping analysis narrowed the candidate region to the 18 kb shown by a red double-headed arrow. RIRE2 indicates a gypsy-type retrotransposon. The bottom horizontal line represents an enlarged map of the 18 kb region. There are five predicted genes, whose exons are represented as black boxes. A premature stop codon detected in the bmr-6 genome is indicated in the box. (b) The expression level of each gene determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The reads per kilo-base per million reads (RPKM) scores are also shown. N.D. means the sequence was not detected. (c) Introduction of DNA fragment encompassing the Dw1 gene (SIL-05 allele) (pCAM-Dw1) into NIL-dw1 plant Bar = 1 m. (d) Empty vector introduced NIL-dw1 plant was used as a control (vector control). Bar = 1 m. (e) The culm lengths of the transgenic plants with Dw1 gene (left) and empty vector (right). Error bars represent the standard deviation. Double asterisk indicates a significant difference at 1% (P <0.01) as determined by t-test.
Figure 3Semi-dwarf phenotypes of Os01g0103800 and Os03g0270700 rice RNAi lines, and of At1g76660 Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines.
(a) Plant stature of Os01g0103800 and Os03g0270700 RNAi lines. From left: vector control, RNAi-no.1, RNAi-no.2, and RNAi-no.3. Bar = 50 cm. (b) Expression levels of Os01g0103800, Os03g0270700, and actin (control) in the RNAi and vector control plants. (c) Length of culm, panicle, and each internode of the RNAi and vector control plants. (d) Positions of T-DNA insertions in At1g76660 (AtDw1), forming two lines (038235 and 059180). Protein coding regions and UTRs are represented by black and white boxes, respectively. Introns are indicated by black bars. ‘ATG’ and ‘Stop’ indicate the initiation and stop codon sites. (e) Phenotypes of the T-DNA insertion lines: left, 038235 and right, 059180. Scale bar = 10 cm. (f) Plant heights of the T-DNA insertion lines. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Double asterisks indicate significant differences at 1% (P < 0.01) as determined by t-test.
The graphical view of haplotypes around Dw1 among cultivars.
| genotype | Position (Mb) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.208 | 57.211 | 57.229 | 57.240 | 57.266 | 57.2721 | 57.2729 | ||
| ( | ||||||||
| SIL-05 | ||||||||
| bmr-6 | ||||||||
| ↓ | ||||||||
| Tall white Sooner Milo (SA1170) | ||||||||
| Standard Milo | ||||||||
| ↓used for breeding | ||||||||
| Dwarf White Milo | ||||||||
| D.D. Yellow Sooner Milo | ||||||||
| Martin 3dw | ||||||||
| Plainsman 3dw | ||||||||
| 38 M | ||||||||
| 44 M | ||||||||
| 58 M | ||||||||
| 60 M | ||||||||
| 80 M | ||||||||
| 90 M | ||||||||
| 100 M | ||||||||
| SM60 | ||||||||
| SM80 | ||||||||
| SM90 | ||||||||
| SM100 | ||||||||
| ATx 623 | ||||||||
| BTx 623 | ||||||||
| 3121A 4dw Martin | ||||||||
| 3127A 4dw Kafir | ||||||||
| 4dw 380B | ||||||||
| Texas Blackhull Kafir | ||||||||
| Pink Kafir | ||||||||
| Hegari | ||||||||
| Early Hegari | ||||||||
| Black Spanish Standard Broom Corn | ||||||||
| Japanese Dwarf Standard Broom Corn | ||||||||
| Sumac | ||||||||
| Bonita | ||||||||
aThe physical positions of seven SNPs, which were also presented as arrowheads on the top line in Fig. 2a.
bThe genotype of Dw1 reported by Quinby et al.21.
cThe SNP in Dw1 that forms the premature stop codon in bmr-6 (b highlighted with bold font), while SIL-05 contains its WT allele (S highlighted with italics).
dSNPs of SIL-05 and bmr-05 presented as S and b, respectively (highlighted with italic and bold font, respectively).
eOriginal milo such as ‘Tall White Sooner Milo’ (SA1170) carrying Dw1, and Standard milo contain the same haplotype of ‘Dwarf White Milo’ with one exception, the SNP in Dw1.
fThe 2-dwarf type ‘Dwarf White Milo’ carrying dw1 contains the same haplotype as bmr-6.
gAll 3- or 4-dwarf cultivars contain the same haplotype as bmr-6 or ‘Dwarf White Milo’.
hOther cultivars, including Kafir and Hegari, contain the same haplotype as SIL-05.
Figure 4Genetic interactions between Dw1 and Dw3.
(a) The internode elongation patterns of the NILs and their background lines. From left to right: SIL-05, NIL-dw1, NIL-dw3, and NIL-dw1dw3. Leaves were removed to observe nodes and internodes. Roman numbers indicate the position of the internode (counted from the top). Arrowheads indicate nodes. (b) The average lengths of each internode calculated using seven plants. From left to right: SIL-05, NIL-dw1, NIL-dw3, and NIL-dw1dw3. (c–f) Longitudinal sections of the middle of internode IX from NILs and SIL-05. The parenchyma cells were examined. Vertical bars = 200 μm. (g,h) Length and deduced number of parenchyma cells of internode IX calculated from five cell files of parenchyma cells (shown as “p” in panels c–f). Error bars represent the standard deviation. Single and double asterisks indicate significant differences at 5% (P < 0.05) and 1% (P < 0.01) levels of significance, respectively, as determined by t-test.