Literature DB >> 27329533

Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.

Evan K Perrault1, Samantha A Nazione2.   

Abstract

As informed consent forms continue to lengthen, are these lengthening forms helping to create better informed participants? The aim of this research was to determine whether the length of consent forms affected reading frequency and comprehension, and to provide recommendations on how to improve consent forms in the social sciences so they are more likely to be read. A quasi-experiment was conducted using actual consent forms at two liberal arts schools, one requiring a long form (463 words, n = 73) and one requiring a shorter form (236 words, n = 57). Participants exposed to the shorter form reported fully reading, or at least skimming the form more frequently than those exposed to the longer form. Those exposed to the shorter form also comprehended more of the form's information. The majority of participants indicated consent forms need to be shortened if researchers want future participants to be more likely to read these forms' contents. Additional recommendations are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRB; comprehension; consent forms; informed consent; length

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27329533     DOI: 10.1177/1556264616654610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  6 in total

1.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcus Bendtsen; Katarina Åsberg; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 11.150

3.  Assessing usefulness and researcher satisfaction with consent form templates.

Authors:  Elaine L Larson; Alan Teller; Alejandra N Aguirre; Jhia Jackson; Dodi Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-08

4.  Development of an online research platform for use in a large-scale multicentre study.

Authors:  A R Godden; A Micha; C Pitches; P A Barry; K D C Krupa; J E Rusby
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis, people experiencing other mental health problems and for informal carers: Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) study protocol for three randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Rachel Elliott; Melanie Smuk; Clare Robinson; Sylvia Bailey; Roger Smith; Jeroen Keppens; Hannah Hussain; Kristian Pollock; Pim Cuijpers; Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Fiona Ng; Caroline Yeo; James Roe; Ada Hui; Lian van der Krieke; Rianna Walcott; Mike Slade
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: an audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation.

Authors:  Kjell Asplund; Kerstin Hulter Åsberg
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.