Kuniaki Ohara1, Yasuhiro Fujisawa2, Koji Yoshino3, Yoshio Kiyohara4, Takafumi Kadono5, Yozo Murata6, Hisashi Uhara7, Naohito Hatta8, Hiroshi Uchi9, Shigeto Matsushita10, Tatsuya Takenouchi11, Toshihiko Hayashi12, Kenichi Yoshimura13, Manabu Fujimoto14. 1. Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Japan; Toranomon Hospital, Japan. 2. University of Tsukuba, Japan. Electronic address: fujisan@md.tsukuba.ac.jp. 3. Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Japan. 4. Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan. 5. University of Tokyo, Japan. 6. Hyogo Cancer Center, Japan. 7. University of Shinshu, Japan. 8. Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Japan. 9. University of Kyushu, Japan. 10. University of Kagoshima, Japan. 11. Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. 12. University of Hokkaido, Japan. 13. University of Kanazawa, Japan. 14. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) usually appears as carcinoma in situ, it sometimes becomes invasive (iEMPD) and fatal. However, a TNM staging system for iEMPD has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish a TNM staging system for iEMPD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected iEMPD patients treated at 12 institutes in Japan. Factors reported to be associated with survival such as distant metastasis, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and primary tumor status were evaluated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We enrolled 301 iEMPD patients, of whom 114 had remote metastases (49 had both distant and LN metastasis; 2, distant metastasis only; and 63, LN metastasis only) and the remaining 187 patients had no remote metastasis. Distant metastasis (M1) showed worse survival (P<0.00001). In the analysis of the 250 patients without distant metastasis, LN metastasis also showed worse survival (P<0.00001). Among the patients with LN metastasis, 2 or more LN metastases (N2) showed worse survival than did single LN metastasis (N1, P=0.02). Lastly, in the analysis of the 187 patients without metastasis, tumor thickness of over 4mm or lymphovascular invasion showed worse survival (T2, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). Patients with neither of these features were defined as T1. From these results, we propose this TNM staging system: stage I, T1N0M0; stage II, T2N0M0; stage IIIa, anyTN1M0; stage IIIb, anyTN2M0; stage IV, anyTanyNM1. Other than stages II and IIIa, each stage had a statistically distinct survival curve. CONCLUSION: We propose a TNM staging system for EMPD using simple factors for classification that could provide important prognostic information in managing EMPD. However, accumulation of more patient data and further revision of the system are required.
BACKGROUND: Although extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) usually appears as carcinoma in situ, it sometimes becomes invasive (iEMPD) and fatal. However, a TNM staging system for iEMPD has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish a TNM staging system for iEMPD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected iEMPD patients treated at 12 institutes in Japan. Factors reported to be associated with survival such as distant metastasis, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and primary tumor status were evaluated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We enrolled 301 iEMPD patients, of whom 114 had remote metastases (49 had both distant and LN metastasis; 2, distant metastasis only; and 63, LN metastasis only) and the remaining 187 patients had no remote metastasis. Distant metastasis (M1) showed worse survival (P<0.00001). In the analysis of the 250 patients without distant metastasis, LN metastasis also showed worse survival (P<0.00001). Among the patients with LN metastasis, 2 or more LN metastases (N2) showed worse survival than did single LN metastasis (N1, P=0.02). Lastly, in the analysis of the 187 patients without metastasis, tumor thickness of over 4mm or lymphovascular invasion showed worse survival (T2, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). Patients with neither of these features were defined as T1. From these results, we propose this TNM staging system: stage I, T1N0M0; stage II, T2N0M0; stage IIIa, anyTN1M0; stage IIIb, anyTN2M0; stage IV, anyTanyNM1. Other than stages II and IIIa, each stage had a statistically distinct survival curve. CONCLUSION: We propose a TNM staging system for EMPD using simple factors for classification that could provide important prognostic information in managing EMPD. However, accumulation of more patient data and further revision of the system are required.