Literature DB >> 27328640

Incisal coverage or not in ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rafael Borges Albanesi1, Mônica Nogueira Pigozzo2, Newton Sesma3, Dalva Cruz Laganá4, Susana Morimoto5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether incisal coverage is a risk or a protective factor in preparations for ceramic veneers.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the survival rates of preparation designs for ceramic veneers with and without incisal coverage.
METHODS: Primary clinical studies with the following characteristics were included: 1) studies related to ceramic laminate veneers and 2) prospective or retrospective studies conducted in humans. From the selected studies, the survival rates and failures rates for ceramic veneers were extracted according to preparation design, with or without incisal coverage. The Cochran Q test and the I(2) statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Metaregression, meta-analysis were performed. Two reviewers searched in the MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) electronic databases, from 1977 to June 5, 2016, without language restrictions.
RESULTS: Eight studies out of 1145 articles initially identified were included for risk of bias and systematic assessment. No study was identified for crystalline ceramic veneers. The estimated survival rate for laminate veneers with incisal coverage was 88% and 91% for those without incisal coverage. Incisal coverage presented an OR of 1.25.
CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the preparation designs, with or without incisal coverage, ceramic veneers showed high survival rates. As regard implications for future clinical research studies, randomized clinical studies are necessary to compare preparation designs with and without incisal coverage, and to provide clear descriptions of these preparation designs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ceramics; Dental; Dental laminate; Dental porcelain; Dental veneers; Esthetics; Systematic review; Tooth preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27328640     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Fracture resistance of veneers in premolars.

Authors:  Ludmilla Azevedo Linhares; Larissa Fernanda Pottmaier; Guilherme Carpena Lopes
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

2.  Esthetic and functional rehabilitation of peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors: Practical recommendations.

Authors:  Nadine Omeish; Ali Nassif; Sara Feghali; Brigitte Vi-Fane; Julia Bosco
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Dentin Exposure after Tooth Preparation for Laminate Veneers: A Microscopical Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Operators' Expertise.

Authors:  Roberto Sorrentino; Gennaro Ruggiero; Bruna Borelli; Alberta Barlattani; Fernando Zarone
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with different thicknesses of porcelain laminate veneers: An 8-year follow-up clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Tassiana Cançado Melo Sá; Monize Ferreira Figueiredo de Carvalho; Julio Celso M de Sá; Claudia Silami Magalhães; Allyson Nogueira Moreira; Monica Yamauti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  Prefabricated resin veneer: A case report of a simplified restorative technique.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo Albuquerque; Marina Barreto Pereira Moreno; Alexander Cassandri Nishida; Ezequias Rodrigues; Camila Kiyohara; Carlos Eduardo Francci
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2018-06-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.