Literature DB >> 27327894

Are you looking my way? Ostracism widens the cone of gaze.

Pessi Lyyra1, James H Wirth2, Jari K Hietanen1.   

Abstract

Ostracized individuals demonstrate an increased need for belonging. To satisfy this need, they search for signals of inclusion, one of which may be another person's gaze directed at oneself. We tested if ostracized, compared to included, individuals judge a greater degree of averted gaze as still being direct. This range of gaze angles still viewed as direct has been dubbed "the cone of (direct) gaze". In the current research, ostracized and included participants viewed friendly-looking face stimuli with direct or slightly averted gaze (0°, 2°, 4°, 6°, and 8° to the left and to the right) and judged whether stimulus persons were looking at them or not. Ostracized individuals demonstrated a wider gaze cone than included individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone of gaze; Eye contact perception; Gaze perception; Ostracism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27327894     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1204327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  6 in total

1.  Eye Contact Judgment Is Influenced by Perceivers' Social Anxiety But Not by Their Affective State.

Authors:  Tingji Chen; Lauri Nummenmaa; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-10

2.  How social exclusion modulates social information processing: A behavioural dissociation between facial expressions and gaze direction.

Authors:  Francesco Bossi; Marcello Gallucci; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Social inclusion, but not exclusion, delays attentional disengagement from direct gaze.

Authors:  Aleksi H Syrjämäki; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-10-15

4.  Deconstructing eye contact perception: Measuring perceptual precision and self-referential tendency using an online psychophysical eye contact detection task.

Authors:  Carly A Lasagna; Merranda M McLaughlin; Wisteria Y Deng; Erica L Whiting; Ivy F Tso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distinguishing Social From Private Intentions Through the Passive Observation of Gaze Cues.

Authors:  Mathis Jording; Denis Engemann; Hannah Eckert; Gary Bente; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Perception of direct gaze in a video-conference setting: the effects of position and size.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Linda Linke
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.