| Literature DB >> 27327277 |
.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150189.].Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27327277 PMCID: PMC4915791 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effects of flanking DNA substitutions on Fis-DNA binding affinity and complex stability
| Fold- | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Kd (nM) | difference | t1/2 (min) | |
| F1(±8T) | 0.2 ± 0.07 | 1 | 41 ± 4 | |
| F1±8A | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 10 | 5 ± 0.5 | |
| F1±8C | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 3 | 14 ± 1 | |
| F1±8G | 30 ± 6 | 150 | < 0.25 | |
| F1±9A | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 3 | 22 ± 2 | |
| F1±9C | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 2 | 30 ± 2 | |
| F1±9G | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 3 | 25 ± 2 | |
| F1±10A | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3 | 36 ± 5 | |
| F1±10C | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 2 | 44 ± 1 | |
| F1±10G | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3 | 38 ± 5 | |
| F14 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3 | ND | |
| F15 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 2 | ND | |
| F16 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 3 | ND | |
| F33 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 6 | ND | |
| F34 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1 | 8 ± 1 | |
| INV | 33 ± 3 | 165 | < 0.25 | |
| INV±8G | 250 ± 20 | 1250 | ND | |
| INV±8C | 6.0 ± 2 | 30 | ND | |
| INV±8T | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 12 | 4 ± 0.7 | |
| INV-CAT | 2.9 ± 1.0 | 15 | ND | |
| INV-GAT | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 10 | ND | |
| INV±9-10T | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 2 | ND |
1Upper case letters represent the 15 bp core Fis binding site sequence and those in lower case represent flanking DNA. Underlined and bold nucleotides highlight those that differ from F1.
2Fold-difference relative to the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) for WT Fis with F1 DNA.
3Not determined.
Interplay between Fis residues contacting the flanking sequences and binding site variants
| -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Fis protein | Kd (nM) | Fold-difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 0.2 ± 0.05 | 1 | ||
| R71A | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 2.5 | ||
| T75A | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 1.5 | ||
| N73A | 29 ± 0.2 | 140 | ||
| WT | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1 | ||
| R71A | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 14 | ||
| T75A | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 18 | ||
| WT | 28 ± 4 | 140 | ||
| R71A | 470 ± 100 | 2300 | ||
| T75A | > 1000 | > 5000 | ||
| WT | 28 ± 5 | 140 | ||
| R71A | 73 ± 11 | 370 | ||
| T75A | 76 ± 10 | 380 | ||
| WT | 30 ± 0.8 | 150 | ||
| R71A | 450 ± 20 | 2270 | ||
| T75A | 48 ± 5 | 240 |
1Fold-difference relative to the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) for WT Fis with F1 DNA.
Effects of flanking and core substitutions on Fis-induced DNA bending
| Gel mobility assay | In-gel FRET assay | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Bend angle°) | (FRET efficiency) | ||||||
| Free | Complex | Free | Complex | Distance (Å) | Angle (°) | ||
| -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | (complex) | (complex) | |||||
| F1 | 51 ± 3 | 119 ± 3 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 82.6 | 68 | |
| F1±8A | 48 ± 3 | 109 ± 3 | - | - | - | - | |
| F1±8C | 47 ± 3 | 126 ± 2 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 83.3 | 66 | |
| F1±8G | 41 ± 1 | 99 ± 1 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 85.6 | 61 | |
| F1±9A | 46 ± 3 | 104 ± 2 | - | - | - | - | |
| F1±9C | 45 ± 1 | 99 ± 1 | - | - | - | - | |
| F1±9G | 42 ± 2 | 89 ± 2 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 90.1 | 50 | |
| INV | ≤ 36 | 62 ± 1 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 94.7 | 36 | |
| F34 | ~ 0 | 62 ± 3 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 83.3 | 66 | |
| F18 | 51 ± 2 | 116 ± 1 | - | - | - | - | |
| F31 | 51 ± 2 | 108 ± 2 | - | - | - | - | |
| F32 | 52 ± 1 | 106 ± 2 | - | - | - | - | |
1Inter-fluorophore distance calculated from FRET efficiency as detailed in the Methods.
2Angle calculated assuming a single central bend in the Fis-bound DNA as detailed in the Methods.