Literature DB >> 27326725

Mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder: cost-effectiveness from US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives.

Ronald C Wielage1, Sinem Perk1, Noll L Campbell2,3, Timothy M Klein1, Linda M Posta4, Thomas Yuran4, Robert W Klein1, Daniel B Ng4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The first class of oral pharmacologic treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) are antimuscarinics that are associated with poor persistence, anticholinergic adverse events, and increased anticholinergic burden (ACB) with risk of cognitive impairment. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenoceptor agonist, is an oral treatment that does not contribute to ACB and has early evidence of improved persistence. The objective of the analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron for OAB vs six antimuscarinics in the US.
METHODS: A Markov state-transition model assessed US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives over a 3-year time horizon in an OAB patient population. Transition probabilities between five micturition and five incontinence severity states were derived from a network meta-analysis of 44 trials of oral OAB treatments. Therapy beginning with an oral OAB agent could discontinue or switch to another oral agent and could be followed by tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Utilities were mapped from incontinence and micturition frequencies as well as demographics. Based on analysis of data from a large healthcare system, elevated ACB was associated with increased healthcare utilization and probability of cognitive impairment.
RESULTS: From both commercial and Medicare Advantage perspectives, mirabegron was the most clinically effective treatment, while oxybutynin was the least expensive. Tolterodine immediate release (IR) was also on the cost-effectiveness frontier. The analysis estimated costs per QALY of $59,690 and $66,347 for mirabegron from commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, respectively, compared to tolterodine IR. Other antimuscarinics were dominated.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis estimated that mirabegron is a cost-effective treatment for OAB from US commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, due to fewer projected adverse events and comorbidities, and data suggesting better persistence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overactive bladder; cost-effectiveness; incontinence; pharmacoeconomics; urology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27326725     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1204307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of Economic Value Drivers of the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

Authors:  Sonya J Snedecor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Real-world persistence and adherence to oral antimuscarinics and mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder (OAB): a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Gillian Yeowell; Philip Smith; Jameel Nazir; Zalmai Hakimi; Emad Siddiqui; Francis Fatoye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Agents for the Treatment of Adults with Overactive Bladder in Colombia.

Authors:  Hélène Parise; Robert Espinosa; Katherine Dea; Pablo Anaya; Giovanny Montoya; Daniel Bin Ng
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.