| Literature DB >> 27326391 |
V Nicolin1, G Baldini1, D De Iaco1, R Bortul1, G Turco1, S L Nori2.
Abstract
One of the issues regarding in vitro study of bone resorption is the synthesis of a bone-like biomaterial forming a thin layer onto either glass or plastic. The synthesis of a bone-like material suitable for in vitro studies can be valuable both to investigate osteoclast differentiation, that in vivo proceeds within the local microenvironment of bone and to understand how its presence triggers activation of macrophages present in situ when bone is damaged (a scenario that can occur for example in case of bone fracture). Despite the intensive studies committed to recreate synthetic bone analogues, the most used substrates for in vitro studies on bone resorption are slices of bone or dentine. Therefore morphological investigations (i.e. fluorescence analysis and phase contrast) are strongly compromised due to the thickness of the bone analogue. In the present study, with the aim to guarantee a versatile (and easy to be made) substrate, that could be suitable to study cell adhesion and morphology by epifluorescence, phase contrast and TEM, we developed a biomaterial containing a calcium phosphate salt and type I collagen. This material (made specifically for in vitro studies) forms a very thin layer that allowed to merge the morphological information derived from phase-contrast and epifluorescence observation, making possible the observation of the interface between cell and matrix. Moreover the electron microscopy evaluation of the endocytosis performed on cell differentiated could be more suitable because sample does not need the process of demineralization.Entities:
Keywords: adhesion; biomaterial; bone matrix resorption; calcium phosphate; macrophages; monocytes; osteoclasts; phagocytosis; type I collagen
Year: 2016 PMID: 27326391 PMCID: PMC4912334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Med UniSa ISSN: 2239-9747
Fig. 1.A: CaP is constituted by nano scaled (40–90nm), needle-like particles with the long axis oriented randomly and embedded in a scaffold of amorphous material. B: CaP/type I collagen has a similar texture but presents a less electrondense appearance. C: light microscopy, phase contrast image of CaP/type I collagen seeded on a glass slide. D: phase contrast image of collagen at the same concentration used in CaP/type I collagen but without calcium chloride dehydrate, dried onto a glass slide when a neutral pH is restored. Collagen forms fibers. E: SEM image of CaP/type I collagen.
Fig. 2.A,B: phase-contrast of fluorescence micrograph of the same field to compare actin fluorescence of cells near to the edge of CaP/type I collagen versus cells seeded on glass: the physical contact with the two materials elicits a different actin organization. Arrows: cells on glass, white dots: reference points on same cells. In the right corner of B a fourfold enlargement of an area is shown. C,D: two micrographs of the same field to describe the spatial position of actin structures, nucleus and CaP/type I collagen. The first using filters for FITC (green fluorescence), the second is taken with both transmitted phase contrast and epifluorescence lights on and DAPI (blu) fluorescence filters inserted. E: the two images C, D were overlapped with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 program. C1: the insert shows an undifferentiated RAW 264.7 cell cultured on glass with individual podosomes scattered in the ventral zone of the cell body. C2 and C3: two enlargements of C showing that the size of the formed actin patches are bigger than the punctate, single podosome fluorescence.
Fig. 3.A: a contact exerted by a podosome of RAW 264.7 type CRL murine monocyte-macrophage with the mineralized matrix. B: CaP/type I collagen internalized by plasma membrane invagination by a cell presenting nuclear deformation. C: CaP/type I collagen is easily detected in the cytoplasm (white arrows) and is contained in large vesicles of irregular shape enveloped by a single membrane. In close spatial relation to phagosomes there is an abundant dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum (C, black arrows) and clear vesicles.
Fig. 4.A: the cell in the micrograph presents both a ruffled border at the left and large vesicles of undegraded CaP/type I collagen (black arrows) which we have found also in cells that has no ruffled border and therefore are at a lower level of differentiation. B: CaP/type I collagen facing the ruffled border is more fragmented and numerous fine collagen nanofibrils are present (black arrows).