| Literature DB >> 27326256 |
Zhenhua Li1, Kun Dai1, Chijuan Wang1, Yawen Song1, Feng Gu1, Fangfang Liu1, Li Fu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Polo-like kinase 4(PLK4) is an important evolutionarily regulator involved in centrosome duplication. We here investigated the expression of PLK4 mRNA and PLK4 in breast cancer, and evaluated its predictive value for response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4); Resistance.; Survival
Year: 2016 PMID: 27326256 PMCID: PMC4911880 DOI: 10.7150/jca.14307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Correlation of PLK4 expression with clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer.
| Characteristic | PLK4expression[n(%)] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| 77(50.0) | 77(50.0) | |||
| 0.052 | 0.522 | |||
| <50 | 41(53.2) | 37(48.1) | ||
| ≥50 | 36(46.8) | 40(51.9) | ||
| 0.031 | 0.706 | |||
| ≤2 | 19(24.7) | 17(22.1) | ||
| >2 | 58(75.3) | 60(77.9) | ||
| Negative | 33(42.9) | 21(27.3) | ||
| Positive | 44(57.1) | 56(72.7) | ||
| Negative | 64(83.1) | 49(63.7) | ||
| Positive | 13(16.9) | 28(36.3) | ||
| 0.120 | 0.163 | |||
| Ⅰ | 6(7.8) | 4(5.2) | ||
| Ⅱ | 53(68.8) | 48(62.3) | ||
| Ⅲ | 10(13.0) | 16(20.8) | ||
| -0.092 | 0.256 | |||
| Negative | 29(37.7) | 36(46.8) | ||
| Positive | 48(63.3) | 41(53.2) | ||
| -0.066 | 0.416 | |||
| Negative | 29(37.7) | 34(44.2) | ||
| Positive | 48(63.3) | 43(55.8) | ||
| 0.084 | 0.300 | |||
| Negative | 56(72.7) | 50(64.9) | ||
| Positive | 21(27.3) | 27(35.1) | ||
| 0.043 | 0.595 | |||
| Luminal- | 54(70.1) | 50(64.9) | ||
| HER-2-enriched | 7(9.1) | 11(14.3) | ||
| Basal-like | 16(20.8) | 16(20.8) | ||
| -0.093 | 0.266 | |||
| Taxane-based | 24(31.1) | 29(37.7) | ||
| No-taxane-based | 50(64.9) | 41(53.2) | ||
☨Some missing data. ‡Some patients did not accept chemotherapy.
Figure 1Upregulation of PLK4 mRNA expression level in human breast cancer. The mRNA expression level of PLK4 was compared in cancerous tissues and corresponding normal breast tissues from 30 breast cancer patients using a quantitative real-time PCR. After normalizing the amounts of PLK4 transcripts to those of the GAPDH transcripts, the T/N values were measured by dividing the normalized transcript amounts in breast cancer tissues by which in corresponding normal breast tissues.
Figure 2PLK4 expression in invasive breast cancer. A: the specimens were divided into four groups according to the staining intensity and the percentage; B: the percentage of the four groups.
Figure 3PLK4 overexpression indicates high risk of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis or surrounding recurrence, and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Lymph node status (A) and metastasis or recurrence status (B) was analyzed based on the PLK4 expression which was divided into low or high by the median values. PFS (C) and OS (D) curves were generated based on the PLK4 protein expression statuses in 154breast cancer samples.
Univariate Cox-regression analysis for OS and PFS.
| Factors | OS | PFS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | P | HR | 95%CI | P | ||
| Age(<50 vs.≥50) | 0.581 | 0.195-1.735 | 0.331 | 1.014 | 0.549-1.871 | 0.965 | |
| Tumor size, cm (≤2 vs. >2) | 0.688 | 0.215-2.195 | 0.527 | 0.915 | 0.448-1.870 | 0.808 | |
| Tumor Grade (I | 1.674 | 0.547-5.128 | 0.367 | 1.568 | 0.822-2.992 | 0.172 | |
| Node statue(cN- | 9.381 | 1.223-71.931 | 3.967 | 1.664-9.459 | |||
| ER status( - vs. +) | 0.195 | 0.054-0.700 | 0.657 | 0.356-1.212 | 0.179 | ||
| PR status( - vs. +) | 0.288 | 0.090-0.918 | 0.874 | 0.471-1.620 | 0.668 | ||
| HER-2 status( - vs. +) | 0.368 | 0.082-1.646 | 0.191 | 1.070 | 0.554-2.065 | 0.841 | |
| PLK4 (low vs. high) | 7.171 | 1.602-32.092 | 2.624 | 1.355-5.085 | |||
Multivariate Cox-regression analysis for OS and PFS.
| Factors | OS | PFS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | ||||
| Age(<50 vs.≥50) | 0.966 | 0.260-3.591 | 0.958 | 1.223 | 0.603-2.479 | 0.577 | |
| Tumor size, cm (≤2 vs. >2) | 0.492 | 0.128-1.900 | 0.304 | 0.744 | 0.364-1.649 | 0.507 | |
| Tumor Grade (I | 0.904 | 0.209-3.914 | 0.893 | 1.344 | 0.670-2.698 | 0.405 | |
| Node statue(cN- | 5.779 | 0.616-54.212 | 0.125 | 2.995 | 1.196-7.500 | ||
| ER status( - vs. +) | 0.089 | 0.009-0.921 | 0.495 | 0.191-1.281 | 0.147 | ||
| PR status( - vs. +) | 1.080 | 0.131-8.885 | 0.943 | 1.132 | 0.451-2.842 | 0.792 | |
| HER-2 status( - vs. +) | 0.083 | 0.008-0.835 | 0.541 | 0.245-1.193 | 0.128 | ||
| PLK4(low vs. high) | 4.903 | 0.791-30.414 | 0.088 | 2.929 | 1.340-6.405 | ||
The relationship between PLK4 expression and response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 64 paired specimens.
| Groups | PLK4 expression(n) | rs | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| No response | 2 | 9 | -0.253 | 0.044 |
| Partial response | 18 | 14 | ||
| Good response | 13 | 8 | ||
Statistical analysis was used Spearman's Rank-Correlation test (n=64). Specimens were collected from each patient's core needle biopsy of primary breast tumor before neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 4Changes of PLK4 expression before and after taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Changes of the percentage of low or high PLK4 expression were examined in all cases(A), cases with no response(B), cases with partial response(C) and cases with good response(D). Cases with high PLK4 expression before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were particularly analyzed in (E).