Literature DB >> 27325603

Disability progression in aggressive multiple sclerosis.

Suresh Menon1, Feng Zhu2, Afsaneh Shirani2, Joel Oger2, Mark S Freedman3, Helen Tremlett2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine disease progression in 'aggressive' multiple sclerosis (MS), British Columbia, Canada (1980-2009).
METHODS: Aggressive (or 'malignant') MS was defined as Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ⩾6 within 5 years from onset. The first EDSS ⩾6 was termed 'baseline'. Within 2, 3 and 5 years post-baseline, patients were categorized as follows: 'worsened' or 'improved', relative to baseline EDSS (the remainder exhibited no change or had no new scores). The associations between patient characteristics (sex, relapsing onset/primary progressive, onset age, onset symptoms, disease duration, cumulative prior relapses and baseline EDSS) and worsening in disability were examined longitudinally using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 225/4341 (5.2%) aggressive/malignant MS patients, 134 (59.6%) were female, 167 (74.2%) were relapsing onset, 94 (41.8%) had received disease-modifying drugs at some point and the mean follow-up was 8.7 years. The proportion of patients who 'worsened' increased from 40.4% to 57.8%, while those who 'improved' varied little (range, 8.9%-10.2%). The odds of worsening increased with disease duration (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-1.52) and the presence of primary progressive (vs relapsing-onset) MS (AOR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.01-3.38).
CONCLUSION: Apart from disease duration and a primary progressive course, no clinically useful associations of subsequent disease worsening in patients with aggressive/malignant MS were identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; epidemiology; neuroepidemiology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27325603     DOI: 10.1177/1352458516653273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  4 in total

1.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a first-line disease-modifying therapy in patients with 'aggressive' multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J Das; J A Snowden; J Burman; M S Freedman; H Atkins; M Bowman; R K Burt; R Saccardi; C Innocenti; S Mistry; P J Laud; H Jessop; B Sharrack
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.312

2.  Increased intrathecal neurofilament light and immunoglobulin M predict severe disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Igal Rosenstein; Sofia Rasch; Markus Axelsson; Lenka Novakova; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Jan Lycke
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Aggressive multiple sclerosis (1): Towards a definition of the phenotype.

Authors:  Ellen Iacobaeus; Georgina Arrambide; Maria Pia Amato; Tobias Derfuss; Sandra Vukusic; Bernhard Hemmer; Mar Tintore; Lou Brundin
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Aggressive multiple sclerosis: a matter of measurement and timing.

Authors:  David Ellenberger; Peter Flachenecker; Firas Fneish; Niklas Frahm; Kerstin Hellwig; Friedemann Paul; Alexander Stahmann; Clemens Warnke; Paulus S Rommer; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 13.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.