| Literature DB >> 27325155 |
Shu-Ju Tsai1, Chiang-Lun Wang2, Hung-Chun Lee2, Chun-Yeh Lin2, Jhih-Wei Chen2, Hong-Wei Shiu3, Lo-Yueh Chang3, Han-Ting Hsueh4, Hung-Ying Chen5, Jyun-Yu Tsai6, Ying-Hsin Lu6, Ting-Chang Chang6, Li-Wei Tu6, Hsisheng Teng7, Yi-Chun Chen2, Chia-Hao Chen3, Chung-Lin Wu2.
Abstract
In tEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27325155 PMCID: PMC4915203 DOI: 10.1038/srep28326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1TEM, PL, and optical Eg characterizations: (a,b) are cross-sectional HRTEM images of PA-ABD a-Si3N4 grown on Si (100) and Si (111) substrates with pre-treatment at high temperature (600 °C) and lower temperature (950 °C), respectively. (c) Room temperature PL spectra for the PA-ABD a-Si3N4/Si (100) (red), the PA-ABD a-Si3N4/Si (111) (blue), the PECVD a-SiNx/Si (111) and bare Si (100) and Si (111) substrates (black curve). (d) Optical Eg measurement of PA-ABD a-Si3N4 with red circles for experimental data, black curve for fitting) by UV-visible absorption spectra. The blue curve is previously reported data for the stoichiometric a-Si3N423. The inset is the photo of the PA-ABD a-Si3N4 membrane for the transmission measurement.
Figure 2Band structure analysis: μ-PES spectra of the Si 2p core-level taken on cross-sectional PA-ABD a-Si3N4/Si(111) (a) and PECVD a-SiNx/Si(111) (b) samples for clean interface and bulk regions. SR-PES spectra of the Si 2p core-level taken on PA-ABD a-Si3N4 (c) and PECVD a-SiNx (d) surfaces for obtaining energy differences between the Si 2p core-level and the valence-band maxima (ECL-EVBM). Schematic illustration of the XSPEM and SR-PES on the PA-ABD a-Si3N4/Si(111) and PECVD a-SiNx/Si(111) samples are included in the left panel of the Figure. The corresponding decomposition of Si 2p states for a-Si3N4 and a-SiNx are also shown. The leading edges of valence bands for determining EVBM from a-Si3N4 and a-SiNx can be observed in the insets of (c,d), respectively. The black dots are the experimentally spectral data points and color lines are the curve-fitting results. (e) The schematic energy band diagram of a-SiNx/Si(111), a-Si3N4/Si(111), and a-Si3N4/Si(100) based on the measured values of ΔECL, ECL-EVBM, in (a–d), and the crystalline orientated EA value of Si bulk.
Figure 3Leakage current and surface morphology characterizations: (a) Leakage gate current densities and breakdown fields for the 10-nm thick PA-ABD a-Si3N4 grown on Si (111) (black curve) and Si (100) (blue curve). The top inset is the schematic energy band diagram of the MNS capacitor with a p-type substrate for a negative gate bias. The AFM images taken on the corresponding a-Si3N4 layers with (b) and without (c) surface steps grown on Si (111) and Si (100), respectively. The average height profiles are shown below the images and the scale bars indicate for 100 nm of length.
Figure 4Gate current densities modeling and EOT analysis: (a) Model the gate current densities for 2.1 nm of PA-ABD a-Si3N4 on the p-type Si (100) substrate with dots for experimental data and with red curve for the model of direct tunneling. The top inset is the energy band diagram of the MNS capacitor with a p-type substrate for a negative gate bias, and the bottom inset is cross sectional HR TEM image. (b) Plot of leakage current density at 1V of gate voltage versus EOT for SiO241, HfO24243, and PA-ABD a-Si3N4 for comparison, and PA-ABD a-Si3N4 shows a significant leakage current reduction. The criteria of low power limit and gate limit of leakage current densities are taken from previous reports144.