Literature DB >> 27325139

A comparative study of transformation models for the sequential mosaicing of long retinal sequences of slit-lamp images obtained in a closed-loop motion.

Kristina Prokopetc1,2, Adrien Bartoli3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Navigated panretinal photocoagulation is a standard care for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Slit-lamp-based systems used for this treatment provide a narrow view of the retina. Retinal mosaics are used for view expansion and treatment planning. Mosaicing slit-lamp images is a hard task due to the absence of a physical model of the imaging process, large textureless regions and imaging artifacts, mostly reflections.
METHODS: We present a comparative study of various geometric transformation models applied to retinal image mosaicing in computer-assisted slit-lamp imaging. We propose an efficient point correspondence-based framework for transformation model evaluation in a typical closed-loop motion scenario. We compare the performance of multiple linear and nonlinear models of different complexities and assess the effect of the number of points used for parameter estimation. We use a local fitting error (LFE) metric to estimate the models' performance in pairwise registration. Because LFE alone is not conclusive regarding the problem of accumulated drift, we propose a loop closure error (LCE) metric to quantify the effect of accumulated local registration errors. We also provide a new normalization procedure for the quadratic transformation model, widely used in retinal image registration.
RESULTS: In total, seven transformation models were evaluated on three datasets of long image sequences. LFE decreases with increasing complexity of the model, while LCE, in contrast, shows superior performance of simple models. Varying the number of point correspondences did not reveal a common trend for the LCE metric, showing an increase in the error for simple models and an unstable behavior of the complex models.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that simple models are less sensitive to drift and preferable for sequential mosaicing in slit-lamp imaging, while more complex models are the best choice for short-term registration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drift; Image registration; Model; Mosaicing; Retina; Transformation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27325139     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1439-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  10 in total

1.  Mosaicking and enhancement of slit lamp biomicroscopic fundus images.

Authors:  J Asmuth; B Madjarov; P Sajda; J W Berger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The dual-bootstrap iterative closest point algorithm with application to retinal image registration.

Authors:  Charles V Stewart; Chia-Ling Tsai; Badrinath Roysam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Registration and fusion of retinal images--an evaluation study.

Authors:  France Laliberté; Langis Gagnon; Yunlong Sheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Retinopathy in a population-based study.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1992

5.  Focal and panretinal photocoagulation with a navigated laser (NAVILAS®).

Authors:  Marcus Kernt; Raoul Cheuteu; Efstathios Vounotrypidis; Christos Haritoglou; Anselm Kampik; Michael W Ulbig; Aljoscha S Neubauer
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Comparison of conventional pattern and novel navigated panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Jay Chhablani; Annie Mathai; Padmaja Rani; Vishali Gupta; J Fernando Arevalo; Igor Kozak
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Real-time multimodal retinal image registration for a computer-assisted laser photocoagulation system.

Authors:  A Martina Broehan; Tobias Rudolph; Christoph A Amstutz; Jens H Kowal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Fundus image mosaicking for information augmentation in computer-assisted slit-lamp imaging.

Authors:  Rogério Richa; Rodrigo Linhares; Eros Comunello; Aldo von Wangenheim; Jean-Yves Schnitzler; Benjamin Wassmer; Claire Guillemot; Gilles Thuret; Philippe Gain; Gregory Hager; Russell Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Landmark matching based retinal image alignment by enforcing sparsity in correspondence matrix.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Ebenezer Daniel; Allan A Hunter; Rui Xiao; Jianbin Gao; Hongsheng Li; Maureen G Maguire; David H Brainard; James C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Pain and accuracy of focal laser treatment for diabetic macular edema using a retinal navigated laser (Navilas).

Authors:  Marcus Kernt; Raoul E Cheuteu; Sarah Cserhati; Florian Seidensticker; Raffael G Liegl; Julian Lang; Christos Haritoglou; Anselm Kampik; Michael W Ulbig; Aljoscha S Neubauer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-27
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  SLIM (slit lamp image mosaicing): handling reflection artifacts.

Authors:  Kristina Prokopetc; Adrien Bartoli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.