Literature DB >> 27325082

Potential Exposure to Arsenic from Infant Rice Cereal.

Courtney C Carignan1, Tracy Punshon2, Margaret R Karagas3, Kathryn L Cottingham2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rice is known to be high in arsenic, including in infant rice cereal. Although arsenic in drinking water is currently regulated, there are currently no US regulations regarding arsenic concentrations in food.
OBJECTIVE: We used published values to estimate arsenic exposure via rice cereal relative to breast milk or formula for 6- to 12-month-old infants in the general US population.
RESULTS: We found that arsenic exposure from 3 servings of rice cereal exceeded that of formula made with water containing arsenic at 10 μg/L, the US Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that rice cereal can markedly increase arsenic exposure among US infants relative to breast milk and formula.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arsenic; environmental exposure; infant formula; rice cereal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27325082      PMCID: PMC5179225          DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-9996            Impact factor:   2.462


Introduction

Arsenic is a known carcinogen and suspected immunotoxicant.[1] We previously reported that infant formula can be an important source of arsenic exposure, especially when reconstituted with arsenic-contaminated water.[2] However, solid foods are also a potential source of arsenic, especially those containing rice.[3-5] Infant rice cereal, often the first solid food an infant recieves, has been reported to contain elevated concentrations of arsenic.[6-8] This is potentially of concern because early life is a period of both heighted vulnerability to arsenic[9] and high dietary intake relative to adults.[10] Although arsenic in drinking water is currently regulated at concentrations >10 μg/L, the maximum contaminant level (MCL) set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),[11] there are currently no US regulations regarding arsenic concentrations in food.[12] We therefore developed exposure models using published data to compare infant arsenic exposure from rice cereal versus formula prepared with water at and below the MCL.

Methods

Rice Cereal

We estimated the per-serving exposure to arsenic by multiplying the mean serving size[13] by the concentration of total or inorganic arsenic in rice cereal reported by the US Food and Drug Administration[8] and then dividing by the body weight recommended by the US EPA.[3] We estimated exposure using both central tendency and upper bound inputs. For central tendency inputs, we used the median concentration of arsenic in rice cereal (total arsenic: 0.20 μg/g; inorganic arsenic: 0.12 μg/g)[8] and mean body weight (3-6 months: 7.4 kg; 6-12 months: 9.2 kg).[10] Upper bound inputs included the maximum concentration of arsenic in rice cereal (total arsenic: 0.37 μg/g; inorganic arsenic 0.25 μg/g)[8] and fifth percentile body weight (3-6 months: 5.7 kg; 6-12 months: 7.1 kg).[10] Both models used the mean serving size (3-6 months: 11.6 g; 6-12 months: 17 g or ∼4 tablespoons) because no upper bound was available.[13] The water used to reconstitute the cereal was assumed to be free of arsenic. Although water contains primarily inorganic forms of arsenic (AsIII and AsV), rice typically contains organic forms, including dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), a metabolite of inorganic arsenic.[8] The toxicity of the organic forms is less understood; however, the trivalent forms of DMA appear to be toxic.[11] Therefore, we calculated exposures for both total and inorganic arsenic and relied on total arsenic for our comparisons.

Infant Formula

We estimated central tendency and upper bound arsenic exposure (μg/kg/d) for infants fed exclusively with formula prepared using tap water containing arsenic at 3 target concentrations: 1, 5, and 10 μg/L. The total concentration of arsenic in formula included the target concentration of arsenic in tap water plus the concentration of arsenic in formula powder. The total concentration of arsenic in formula was then multiplied by the age-specific body weight–adjusted ingestion rate.[10] For central tendency inputs we used the target concentration of arsenic in tap water (1, 5, or 10 μg/L), the median concentration of arsenic in formula powder (1.1 μg/L),[4] and the mean body weight adjusted ingestion rate (L/kg/d; birth–1 month: 0.15; 1-3 months: 0.14; 3-6 months: 0.11; 6-12 months: 0.08).[10] Upper bound inputs used the target concentration of arsenic in tap water (1, 5, or 10 μg/L), the maximum concentration of arsenic in formula powder (1.8 μg/L),[4] and the upper percentile body weight–adjusted ingestion rate, defined by the US EPA as the mean plus 2 standard deviations (L/kg/d; birth–1 month: 0.22; 1-3 months: 0.19; 3-6 months: 0.15; 6-12 months: 7.1).[10]

Results

Estimated exposure as a result of rice cereal was elevated (Table 1, Fig. 1). Two servings of rice cereal per day resulted in higher total arsenic exposure for 6- to 12-month-old infants than formula made with water containing 5 μg/L. The estimated 1.11 μg/kg/d from 3 servings of rice cereal per day exceeded exposure from formula mixed with water at the MCL and was 6.5 times higher than exposure for a 60-kg adult ingesting 1 L/d of water at the MCL (0.17 μg/kg/d).[6]
Table 1

Central Tendency (Upper Bound) Estimated Daily Exposure (μg/kg/d) for Infants During the First Year of Life as A Result of Formula Mixed with Tap Water Containing Arsenic at 1, 5, or 10 μg/l Versus 1-4 Servings of Infant Rice Cereal

Infant Age (mo)

Birth to <11 to <33 to <66 to <12
Infant formula, tap water arsenic
 1 μg/L0.32 (0.62)0.29 (0.53)0.23 (0.42)0.17 (0.36)
 5 μg/L0.92 (1.5)0.85 (1.29)0.67 (1.02)0.51 (0.88)
 10 μg/L1.67 (2.6)1.55 (2.24)1.22 (1.77)0.92 (1.53)
Servings of infant rice cereal
 1 serving/dNENE0.32 (0.76)0.37 (0.89)
 2 servings/dNENE0.63 (1.52)0.74 (1.77)
 3 servings/dNENE0.95 (2.28)1.11 (2.66)
 4 servings/dNENE1.27 (3.04)1.48 (3.55)

NE, not estimated because rice cereal is not recommended at this age.

Figure 1

Estimated daily exposure to arsenic via formula (left) or rice cereal (right) for 6- to 12-month-old infants. Columns represent central tendency estimates and error bars represent upper bound estimates.

Discussion

Our results indicate that infant rice cereal can be an important source of arsenic exposure for US infants during weaning, consistent with reports from Europe.[6,7] Infants consuming both formula mixed with arsenic-containing water and rice cereal can have especially high exposures. Although we used the MCL as a point of comparison, it is based on chronic, adult-onset disease[11] and was not explicitly designed to protect infants.[9] According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, rice cereal provides no advantage over other grains as a first solid food,[14] and both the the American Academy of Pediatrics and US Food and Drug Administration suggest that infants would benefit from an array of grain cere-als.[14,15] Future research should investigate how effective a no- or low-rice cereal intervention could be at reducing infant exposure to arsenic.
  10 in total

1.  Arsenic in rice--understanding a new disaster for South-East Asia.

Authors:  Andrew A Meharg
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Average portions of foods commonly eaten by infants and toddlers in the United States.

Authors:  Mary Kay Fox; Kathleen Reidy; Vatsala Karwe; Paula Ziegler
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-01

3.  Arsenic accumulation and metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Md Joinal Abedin; Malcolm S Cresser; Andy A Meharg; Jorg Feldmann; Janet Cotter-Howells
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Arsenic concentration and speciation in infant formulas and first foods.

Authors:  Brian P Jackson; Vivien F Taylor; Tracy Punshon; Kathryn L Cottingham
Journal:  Pure Appl Chem       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 5.  In utero and early life arsenic exposure in relation to long-term health and disease.

Authors:  Shohreh F Farzan; Margaret R Karagas; Yu Chen
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Health effects and risk assessment of arsenic.

Authors:  Charles O Abernathy; David J Thomas; Rebecca L Calderon
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Inorganic arsenic levels in baby rice are of concern.

Authors:  Andrew A Meharg; Guoxin Sun; Paul N Williams; Eureka Adomako; Claire Deacon; Yong-Guan Zhu; Joerg Feldmann; Andrea Raab
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Estimated exposure to arsenic in breastfed and formula-fed infants in a United States cohort.

Authors:  Courtney C Carignan; Kathryn L Cottingham; Brian P Jackson; Shohreh F Farzan; A Jay Gandolfi; Tracy Punshon; Carol L Folt; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  In search of "just right": the challenge of regulating arsenic in rice.

Authors:  Charles W Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem.

Authors:  Marisa F Naujokas; Beth Anderson; Habibul Ahsan; H Vasken Aposhian; Joseph H Graziano; Claudia Thompson; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Dietary determinants of inorganic arsenic exposure in the Strong Heart Family Study.

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Pablo Olmedo; Maria Grau-Perez; Rae O'Leary; Marcia O'Leary; Amanda M Fretts; Jason G Umans; Lyle G Best; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Shelley A Cole; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Human exposure to dietary inorganic arsenic and other arsenic species: State of knowledge, gaps and uncertainties.

Authors:  Francesco Cubadda; Brian P Jackson; Kathryn L Cottingham; Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Exposure to arsenolipids and inorganic arsenic from marine-sourced dietary supplements.

Authors:  Vivien F Taylor; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 4.  Provision of folic acid for reducing arsenic toxicity in arsenic-exposed children and adults.

Authors:  Sajin Bae; Elena Kamynina; Heather M Guetterman; Adetutu F Farinola; Marie A Caudill; Robert J Berry; Patricia A Cassano; Patrick J Stover
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-18

5.  Cereal and Juice, Lead and Arsenic, Our Children at Risk: A Call for the FDA to Re-Evaluate the Allowable Limits of Lead and Arsenic That Children May Ingest.

Authors:  Lorenz S Neuwirth; Ericka Cabañas; Patrick Cadet; Wei Zhu; Morri E Markowitz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Association of Rice and Rice-Product Consumption With Arsenic Exposure Early in Life.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Vicki Sayarath; Brian P Jackson; Carol L Folt; Kathryn L Cottingham
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Urinary arsenic and heart disease mortality in NHANES 2003-2014.

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Katherine A Moon; Miranda R Jones; Tiffany R Sanchez; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 8.431

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.