| Literature DB >> 27324682 |
Sota Iwatani1, Hajime Nakamura1, Daisuke Kurokawa1, Keiji Yamana1, Kosuke Nishida1, Sachiyo Fukushima1, Tsubasa Koda1, Noriyuki Nishimura1, Hisahide Nishio2, Kazumoto Iijima1, Atsushi Miyawaki3, Ichiro Morioka1.
Abstract
Increased serum levels of unconjugated bilirubin are associated with the development of brain damage in newborns. In current clinical settings, there are no methods for directly determining serum levels of unconjugated bilirubin. UnaG, a fluorescent protein from Japanese eel muscle that specifically binds to unconjugated bilirubin was used in this study. Linear regression analysis was carried out to compare unconjugated bilirubin levels measured by UnaG and conventional bilirubin oxidase methods. Unconjugated bilirubin levels in the serum of newborns who were untreated or treated with phototherapy were compared. Effects of interfering factors in the serum (conjugated bilirubin, hemoglobin, and lipid) on unconjugated bilirubin concentration measured by the UnaG method were also evaluated. Unconjugated bilirubin levels measured by the UnaG method were highly correlated with those determined by the bilirubin oxidase assay. Unconjugated bilirubin levels determined by bilirubin oxidase and UnaG assays were similar in serum samples containing conjugated bilirubin. The performance of the UnaG assay was unaffected by phototherapy and the presence of serum hemoglobin and lipid emulsion. These results demonstrate the clinical applicability of the UnaG method for direct measurement of unconjugated bilirubin levels in newborn serum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27324682 PMCID: PMC4914990 DOI: 10.1038/srep28489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Reaction of UnaG with unconjugated bilirubin.
(A) The UnaG assay procedure. (B) UnaG was reacted with artificial unconjugated bilirubin; green fluorescence intensity increased as a function of bilirubin concentration. (C) Calibration curve of fluorescence intensity as a function of unconjugated bilirubin concentration. PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.
Figure 2Correlation between serum unconjugated bilirubin concentrations measured by bilirubin oxidase and UnaG methods.
(A) Serum samples without conjugated bilirubin (<1.0 mg/dl). (B) Effect of epitope tagging (UnaG-His-FLAG) on unconjugated bilirubin detection. Black crosses and blue circles represent data obtained using UnaG and UnaG-His-FLAG, respectively. UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.
Figure 3Correlation between unconjugated bilirubin concentrations measured by bilirubin oxidase and UnaG methods in newborns with/without phototherapy.
Red circles and blue triangles represent data from newborns without and with phototherapy, respectively. UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.
Comparison of unconjugated bilirubin concentrations in serum containing conjugated bilirubin measured by the bilirubin oxidase and UnaG methods.
| Sample | Bilirubin oxidase method (mg/dl)† | UnaG method (mg/dl) | Difference (mg/dl)* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total bilirubin | Conjugated bilirubin | Unconjugated bilirubin | |||
| # 1 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 9.0 | −0.9 |
| # 2 | 14.7 | 1.2 | 13.5 | 15.0 | −1.5 |
| # 3 | 9.6 | 1.5 | 8.1 | 8.7 | −0.6 |
| # 4 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 7.0 | 7.1 | −0.1 |
| # 5 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| # 6 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| # 7 | 5.9 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 |
| # 8 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| # 9 | 7.9 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| # 10 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 |
| # 11 | 12.0 | 9.6 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| # 12 | 19.7 | 16.4 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.3 |
| # 13 | 21.0 | 17.7 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| # 14 | 25.0 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Mean | 4.2 | 3.9 | 0.3 | ||
| SD | 3.46 | 4.17 | 0.84 | ||
SD, standard deviation; UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.
†Serum unconjugated bilirubin concentrations were determined by the bilirubin oxidase method with the following formula: [unconjugated bilirubin] = [total bilirubin] − [conjugated bilirubin] (1 mg/dl = 17.1 μM).
*Difference in values between bilirubin oxidase and UnaG methods.
Effect of interfering factors present in serum on unconjugated bilirubin concentration measured by the UnaG method.
| Hemolysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Hemoglobin (g/dl) | Unconjugated bilirubin (mg/dl) | |
| a | 16 | 11.4 | |
| 8 | 12.5 | ||
| 4 | 11.3 | ||
| 2 | 12.2 | ||
| 1 | 12.3 | ||
| 0 | 11.7 | ||
| b | 16 | 8.4 | |
| 8 | 9.1 | ||
| 4 | 9.1 | ||
| 2 | 8.8 | ||
| 1 | 8.8 | ||
| 0 | 8.5 | ||
| c | 16 | 4.7 | |
| 8 | 4.9 | ||
| 4 | 5.3 | ||
| 2 | 4.6 | ||
| 1 | 5.0 | ||
| 0 | 4.5 | ||
| d | 20 | 15.5 | |
| 2 | 17.0 | ||
| 0.2 | 16.3 | ||
| 0.02 | 15.8 | ||
| 0 | 16.5 | ||
| e | 20 | 8.9 | |
| 2 | 8.9 | ||
| 0.2 | 8.7 | ||
| 0.02 | 9.6 | ||
| 0 | 8.8 | ||
Serum samples a–e contained 12.8, 9.1, 5.3, 16.9, and 7.8 mg/dl unconjugated bilirubin, respectively, as determined by the bilirubin oxidase method. Each concentration represents the final value after adding hemoglobin or lipid emulsion. UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.
Figure 4Unconjugated bilirubin concentrations in whole blood by the UnaG method.
Linear regression analysis between unconjugated bilirubin concentrations (A) in serum by the bilirubin oxidase method and in whole blood by the UnaG method; and (B) in serum by the UnaG method and in whole blood by the UnaG method. UnaG, fluorescent protein from eel muscle.