Literature DB >> 27324280

Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (OS2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Sophie Piperno-Neumann1, Marie-Cécile Le Deley2, Françoise Rédini3, Hélène Pacquement4, Perrine Marec-Bérard5, Philippe Petit6, Hervé Brisse7, Cyril Lervat8, Jean-Claude Gentet9, Natacha Entz-Werlé10, Antoine Italiano11, Nadège Corradini12, Emmanuelle Bompas13, Nicolas Penel14, Marie-Dominique Tabone15, Anne Gomez-Brouchet16, Jean-Marc Guinebretière17, Eric Mascard18, François Gouin19, Aurélie Chevance20, Naïma Bonnet21, Jean-Yves Blay22, Laurence Brugières23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on preclinical data for the antitumour effect of zoledronate in osteosarcoma, we assessed whether zoledronate combined with chemotherapy and surgery improved event-free survival in children and adults with osteosarcoma.
METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial (OS2006), patients aged between 5 years and 50 years with newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma were randomly assigned to receive standard chemotherapy with or without ten zoledronate intravenous infusions (four preoperative and six postoperative). Adults older than 25 years received 4 mg zoledronate per infusion, patients aged 18-25 years received 0·05 mg/kg for the first two infusions and 4 mg for the remaining eight infusions, and younger patients received 0·05 mg/kg per infusion. Chemotherapy comprised high-dose methotrexate based chemotherapy in patients younger than 18 years, and doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in adults older than 25 years; patients aged 18-25 years were treated with either regime at the discretion of the treating centre. Balanced randomisation between the two groups was done centrally with online randomisation software, based on a minimisation algorithm taking into account centre, age, combined with chemotherapy regimen, and risk group (resectable primary and no metastasis vs other). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment, but the endpoint adjudication committee members who reviewed suspected early progressions were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, estimated from the randomisation to the time of first failure (local or distant relapse, progression, death) or to the last follow-up visit for the patients in first complete remission, analysed on a modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded patients found not to have a malignant tumour after central review. Three interim analyses were planned. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00470223.
FINDINGS: Between April 23, 2007, and March 11, 2014, 318 patients, median age 15·5 years (range 5·8-50·9), were enrolled from 40 French centres; of whom 158 were assigned to the control group (chemotherapy alone) and 160 to the zoledronate group, including 55 (17%) patients with definite metastases. The trial was stopped for futility after the second interim analysis. With a median follow-up of 3·9 years (IQR 2·7-5·1), 125 events occurred (55 in the control group and 70 in the with zoledronate group). Event-free survival at 3 years for all 315 randomly assigned patients was 60·3% (95% CI 64·5-65·9); 3-year event-free survival was 63·4% (55·2-70·9) for the control group and 57·1% (48·8-65·0) for the zoledronate group. The risk of failure was not reduced and was even marginally higher in the zoledronate group than in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·36 [95% CI 0·95-1·96]; p=0·094). No major increase in severe toxic effects of grade 3 or higher associated with zoledronate, barring expected hypocalcaemia (45 [29%] of 153 participants in the zoledronate group vs ten [6%] of 155 participants in the control group; p<0·0001) and hypophosphataemia (61 [40%] of 151 in the zoledronate group vs 26 [17%] of 156 in the control group; p<0·0001). No significant difference in orthopaedic complications was noted between the two groups (27 in the control group and 29 in the zoledronate group). Two treatment-related deaths were reported (one from cardiomyopathy in the control group and one from multiorgan failure in the zoledronate group before the first zoledronate infusion).
INTERPRETATION: From the results observed in this study, we do not recommend zoledronate in osteosarcoma patients. Further biological studies are required to understand the discordance between the results of OS2006 trial and preclinical data. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute (INCa), Novartis, Chugai, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Fédération Enfants et Santé, Société Française des Cancers et Leucémies de l'Enfant.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27324280     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  56 in total

1.  Bisphosphonate-Functionalized Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles for the Delivery of the Bromodomain Inhibitor JQ1 in the Treatment of Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Victoria M Wu; Jarrett Mickens; Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics of second-line drugs used for treatment of unresponsive or relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Claudia M Hattinger; Serena Vella; Elisa Tavanti; Marilù Fanelli; Piero Picci; Massimo Serra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Is the Clavicula Pro Humero Technique of Value for Reconstruction After Resection of the Proximal Humerus in Children?

Authors:  Dominique Barbier; Benoît De Billy; Philippe Gicquel; Sophie Bourelle; Pierre Journeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages and CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes are powerful diagnostic markers for the therapeutic stratification of osteosarcoma patients: An immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsies fromthe French OS2006 phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Anne Gomez-Brouchet; Claire Illac; Julia Gilhodes; Corinne Bouvier; Sébastien Aubert; Jean-Marc Guinebretiere; Béatrice Marie; Frédérique Larousserie; Natacha Entz-Werlé; Gonzague de Pinieux; Thomas Filleron; Véronique Minard; Vincent Minville; Eric Mascard; François Gouin; Marta Jimenez; Marie-Cécile Ledeley; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Laurence Brugieres; Françoise Rédini
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Bone microenvironment has an influence on the histological response of osteosarcoma to chemotherapy: retrospective analysis and preclinical modeling.

Authors:  Vincent Crenn; Kevin Biteau; Jérôme Amiaud; Clotilde Dumars; Romain Guiho; Luciano Vidal; Louis-Romée Le Nail; Dominique Heymann; Anne Moreau; François Gouin; Françoise Redini
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 6.  Targeting Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Treatment Efficacy and Resistance in Osteosarcoma: A Review of Current and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Ingrid Lilienthal; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Update on Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Rebekah Belayneh; Mitchell S Fourman; Sumail Bhogal; Kurt R Weiss
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma with bone and soft tissue involvement with favorable response to pamidronate: a case report and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  María Lorena Brance; Nicolás M Cóccaro; Pablo Roitman; Alejandro Castiglioni; Florencia Agostinis; Mariel Spense; Bárbara Scheitlin; Nicholas Rene; Lucas R Brun
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  Curcumin in Osteosarcoma Therapy: Combining With Immunotherapy, Chemotherapeutics, Bone Tissue Engineering Materials and Potential Synergism With Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Chunfeng Xu; Mingjie Wang; Wei Guo; Wei Sun; Yuelian Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Differentiating Co-Delivery of Bisphosphonate and Simvastatin by Self-Healing Hyaluronan Hydrogel Formed by Orthogonal "Clicks": An In-Vitro Assessment.

Authors:  Dmitri A Ossipov; Mads Lüchow; Michael Malkoch
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.