Literature DB >> 27324159

Comparison of Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Versus Without Active Cancer.

Yusuke Watanabe1, Ken Kozuma2, Hirofumi Hioki2, Hideyuki Kawashima2, Yugo Nara2, Akihisa Kataoka2, Shinichi Shirai3, Norio Tada4, Motoharu Araki5, Kensuke Takagi6, Futoshi Yamanaka7, Masanori Yamamoto8, Kentaro Hayashida9.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate postprocedural and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic stenosis and active cancer. From October 2013 to August 2015, a total of 749 patients undergoing TAVI using the Edwards Sapien XT prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) were prospectively included in the OCEAN-TAVI registry from 8 Japanese centers. A total of 47 patients (44.7% men; median age 83 years) had active cancer. The transfemoral approach was implemented in 85.1% of patients in the cancer group and 78.1% in the noncancer group (p = 0.22). The occurrence of major vascular complication (4.3% vs 7.5%, p = 0.24), life-threatening bleeding (2.1% vs 7.1%, p = 0.15), and major bleeding (8.5% vs 13%, p = 0.38) was similar between the cancer and noncancer groups. No significant differences were observed regarding device success (100% vs 96.2%, p = 0.17) or 30-day survival (95.7% vs 97.3%, p = 0.38). No difference in midterm survival was found between the patients with cancer and without cancer (log-rank, p = 0.42), regardless of advanced or limited cancer (log-rank, p = 0.68). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, cancer metastasis was one of the most significant predictors of late mortality (hazard ratio 4.73, 95% CI 1.12 to 20.0; p = 0.035). In conclusion, patients with cancer with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI had similar acute outcomes and midterm survival rates compared with patients without cancer. Cancer metastasis was associated with increased mortality after TAVI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27324159     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

1.  Incidental findings in multislice computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: frequency, clinical relevance and outcome.

Authors:  Teresa Trenkwalder; Anna Lena Lahmann; Magdalena Nowicka; Costanza Pellegrini; Tobias Rheude; N Patrick Mayr; Stephanie Voss; Sabine Bleiziffer; Rüdiger Lange; Michael Joner; Albert M Kasel; Adnan Kastrati; Heribert Schunkert; Oliver Husser; Martin Hadamitzky; Christian Hengstenberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Authors:  Serban Mihai Balanescu; Dinu Valentin Balanescu; Teodora Donisan; Eric H Yang; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Biswajit Kar; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meer Rabeel Zafar; Syed Farrukh Mustafa; Timothy W Miller; Talal Alkhawlani; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  Cardiooncology       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 4.  Interventional Strategies in Cancer-induced Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Bala Pushparaji; Teodora Donisan; Dinu V Balanescu; Nicolas Palaskas; Peter Kim; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Saamir A Hassan; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar; Cezar A Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in active cancer patients and cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bilge Duran Karaduman; Hüseyin Ayhan; Telat Keleş; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 0.332

6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Causes of Death in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: An Observational study.

Authors:  Eri Minamino-Muta; Takao Kato; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomohiko Taniguchi; Hiroki Shiomi; Kenji Nakatsuma; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando; Norio Kanamori; Koichiro Murata; Takeshi Kitai; Yuichi Kawase; Makoto Miyake; Chisato Izumi; Hirokazu Mitsuoka; Masashi Kato; Yutaka Hirano; Shintaro Matsuda; Kazuya Nagao; Tsukasa Inada; Tomoyuki Murakami; Yasuyo Takeuchi; Keiichiro Yamane; Mamoru Toyofuku; Mitsuru Ishii; Moriaki Inoko; Tomoyuki Ikeda; Akihiro Komasa; Eiji Tada; Katsuhisa Ishii; Kozo Hotta; Nobuya Higashitani; Toshikazu Jinnai; Yoshihiro Kato; Yasutaka Inuzuka; Chiyo Maeda; Yuko Morikami; Naritatsu Saito; Ryuzo Sakata; Kenji Minatoya; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and active cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Bendary; Ahmed Ramzy; Mohamed Bendary; Mohamed Salem
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-03-11

9.  Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Amit K Dey; Sameer Arora; Matthew A Cavender; John P Vavalle; Joseph F Sabik; Ernesto Jimenez; Hani Jneid; Daniel Addison
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Cardio-Oncology at the Beginning of a New Decade.

Authors:  Isabella M Grumbach
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.