Literature DB >> 27323651

In vitro biocompatibility of ICON(®) and TEGDMA on human dental pulp stem cells.

Lina Gölz1, Ruth Andrea Simonis2, Joana Reichelt2, Helmut Stark2, Matthias Frentzen3, Jean-Pierre Allam4, Rainer Probstmeier5, Jochen Winter3, Dominik Kraus6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Resin infiltrants have been successfully used in dental medicine preventing the progression of tooth decay in an early phase of caries development. ICON(®) is an infiltrant of low-viscosity which penetrates via dentinal tubules into the lesion in dependence of the demineralization depth. Hence, we performed an in vitro study to determine the effect of ICON(®) on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs).
METHODS: Using explant technique, primary hDPSCs were collected from extracted teeth. Characterization and isolation were performed with typical mesenchymal stem cell markers (Stro-1, CD73, CD90, CD105) and hDPSCs differentiation was validated by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. HDPSCs were stimulated with light-cured ICON(®) (lc) and non-light-cured ICON(®) (nc) conditioned media as well as different TEGDMA concentrations followed by the analysis of cytotoxicity, pro- and anti-inflammatory responses and differentiation using XTT assay, RT-PCR and ELISAs, respectively.
RESULTS: Initial analysis demonstrated that hDPSCs express characteristic mesenchymal stem cell markers and differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Notably, ICON(®) nc dramatically reduced cell viability (up to 98.9% after 48h), whereas ICON(®) lc showed only a modest cytotoxicity (10%). Data were in line with cytokine expression demonstrating increased levels of IL-6 and IL-8 as well as decreased IL-10 after ICON(®) nc exposure compared to ICON(®) lc. ICON(®) lc caused almost no alterations of DSPP, whereas ICON(®) nc markedly elevated DSPP mRNA levels (130.3-times). A concentration-dependent effect was observed in TEGDMA challenged hDPSCs. SIGNIFICANCE: ICON(®) is a successful minimal invasive technique. However, clinicians should strictly follow manufacturer's instructions to prevent adverse effects.
Copyright © 2016 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Cytotoxicity; Dental pulp stem cell; ICON(®); Inflammation; Resin infiltration; TEDGMA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27323651     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  5 in total

1.  Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate: adjuvant properties and effect on cytokine production.

Authors:  Sara Alizadehgharib; Anna-Karin Östberg; Ulf Dahlgren
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-12-05

2.  Study of Cytotoxic Properties of an Experimental Preparation with Features of a Dental Infiltrant.

Authors:  Małgorzata Fischer; Anna Mertas; Zenon Paweł Czuba; Małgorzata Skucha-Nowak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  The effects of the dental methacrylates TEGDMA, Bis-GMA, and UDMA on neutrophils in vitro.

Authors:  Sara Alizadehgharib; Ann-Karin Östberg; Agnes Dahlstrand Rudin; Ulf Dahlgren; Karin Christenson
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-16

4.  Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  Andreas Taubmann; Ines Willershausen; Christian Walter; Sarah Al-Maawi; Bernd Kaina; Lina Gölz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Application of Selected Biomaterials and Stem Cells in the Regeneration of Hard Dental Tissue in Paediatric Dentistry-Based on the Current Literature.

Authors:  Alina Wrzyszcz-Kowalczyk; Maciej Dobrzynski; Iwona Grzesiak-Gasek; Wojciech Zakrzewski; Monika Mysiak-Debska; Patrycja Nowak; Malgorzata Zimolag; Rafal J Wiglusz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.