Literature DB >> 27323336

Prognostic value of acoustic cardiography in patients with chronic heart failure.

Shang Wang1, Ming Liu2, Fang Fang2, Qing Shang2, Jing Ping Sun2, John E Sanderson2, Cheuk Man Yu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid risk stratification in patients with heart failure is critically important but challenging. The aim of our study is to ascertain whether acoustic cardiography can identify heart failure (HF) patients at high risk for mortality.
METHODS: A total of 474 HF patients were enrolled into our study (76±11years old). Acoustic cardiographic parameters included S3 score (ie, third heart sound exists) and systolic dysfunction index (SDI) (correlated closely with left ventricular systolic dysfunction). The event-free survival curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 484days, 169 (35.7%) patients died and 126 (26.6%) were due to cardiac causes. After controlling for age, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, as well as ACEI and beta-blocker treatment in multivariate Cox regression analysis, SDI ≥5 and S3 score ≥4 were both independent predictors for all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that HF patients with SDI ≥5 or S3 score ≥4 had a significantly lower survival (52.2% vs. 69.2%, Log-rank χ(2)=18.07, P<0.001; 56.8% vs. 68.6%, Log-rank χ(2)=10.58, P=0.001, respectively) than those with lower SDI or S3 score.
CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic cardiography could serve as a cost-effective and time-efficient tool to identify HF patients at high risk for mortality who might benefit from aggressive monitoring and intervention. It may improve assessment and initial disposition decisions in HF management.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic cardiology; Diagnosis; Heart failure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27323336     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  6 in total

1.  Use of acoustic cardiography immediately following electrical cardioversion to predict relapse of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Paul Erne; Therese J Resink; Andrea Mueller; Michael Coslovsky; Richard Kobza; David Conen; Peter Bauer; Patricia Arand
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-06-30

2.  Mobile Cardiac Acoustic Monitoring System to Evaluate Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Pacemaker Patients.

Authors:  Jingjuan Huang; Weiwei Zhang; Changqing Pan; Shiwei Zhu; Robert Hardwin Mead; Ruogu Li; Ben He
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Changes in acoustic cardiographic parameters before and after hemodialysis are associated with overall and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Tung-Ling Chung; Yi-Hsueh Liu; Jiun-Chi Huang; Pei-Yu Wu; Szu-Chia Chen; Jer-Ming Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Audicor Remote Patient Monitoring: FDA Breakthrough Device and Technology for Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  Marat Fudim; Michael Mirro; Hao-Ming Cheng
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Use of proposed systolic and myocardial performance indices derived from simultaneous ECG and PCG recordings to assess cardiac function in healthy Beagles.

Authors:  Karlo Romano B Gicana; Chirutchaya Pinidmontree; Kitchanan Kosalathip; Siraphop Sirirut; Siripen Komolvanich; Sariya Asawakarn; Walasinee Sakcamduang; Phornphop Naiyanetr; Kittipong Tachampa
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-07-25

6.  Reintroducing Heart Sounds for Early Detection of Acute Myocardial Ischemia in a Porcine Model - Correlation of Acoustic Cardiography With Gold Standard of Pressure-Volume Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Luciani; Matteo Saccocci; Shingo Kuwata; Nikola Cesarovic; Miriam Lipiski; Patricia Arand; Peter Bauer; Andrea Guidotti; Evelyn Regar; Paul Erne; Michel Zuber; Francesco Maisano
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.