Literature DB >> 27322885

The emotional carryover effect in memory for words.

Stephen R Schmidt1, Constance R Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Emotional material rarely occurs in isolation; rather it is experienced in the spatial and temporal proximity of less emotional items. Some previous researchers have found that emotional stimuli impair memory for surrounding information, whereas others have reported evidence for memory facilitation. Researchers have not determined which types of emotional items or memory tests produce effects that carry over to surrounding items. Six experiments are reported that measured carryover from emotional words varying in arousal to temporally adjacent neutral words. Taboo, non-taboo emotional, and neutral words were compared using different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), recognition and recall tests, and intentional and incidental memory instructions. Strong emotional memory effects were obtained in all six experiments. However, emotional items influenced memory for temporally adjacent words under limited conditions. Words following taboo words were more poorly remembered than words following neutral words when relatively short SOAs were employed. Words preceding taboo words were affected only when recall tests and relatively short retention intervals were used. These results suggest that increased attention to the emotional items sometimes produces emotional carryover effects; however, retrieval processes also contribute to retrograde amnesia and may extend the conditions under which anterograde amnesia is observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arousal; Distinctiveness; Emotion; Memory; Recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27322885     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1059859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  4 in total

Review 1.  Emotional oddball: A review on memory effects.

Authors:  Helge Schlüter; Ryan P Hackländer; Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  The Effect of Stimulus Valence on Lexical Retrieval in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Deena Schwen Blackett; Stacy M Harnish; Jennifer P Lundine; Alexandra Zezinka; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  An ERP investigation of age differences in the negativity bias for self-relevant and non-self-relevant stimuli.

Authors:  Eric C Fields; Holly J Bowen; Ryan T Daley; Katelyn R Parisi; Angela Gutchess; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.133

4.  Local context influences memory for emotional stimuli but not electrophysiological markers of emotion-dependent attention.

Authors:  Gemma E Barnacle; Dimitris Tsivilis; Alexandre Schaefer; Deborah Talmi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.