Literature DB >> 27322769

Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity as a predictor of response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression.

Masahiro Suzuki1, Sara Dallaspezia2, Clara Locatelli2, Makoto Uchiyama3, Cristina Colombo2, Francesco Benedetti2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronotherapeutic techniques (sleep deprivation and light therapy) are effective treatments for bipolar depression, but viable predictors of response for the daily clinical practice have not yet been established. The discrepancy between subjective and objective severity of the depressive syndrome has been proposed as a possible predictor of treatment outcome in depression. This study examined whether this discrepancy could predict response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression.
METHOD: We studied 149 consecutively admitted inpatients with a major depressive episode in course of bipolar disorder. Patients were treated with the combination of repeated sleep deprivation and bright light therapy. Severity of depression was evaluated using self-rated (Beck Depression Inventory: BDI) and observer-rated (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: HDRS) measures. BDI-HDRS discrepancy score at baseline was calculated, and its associations with clinical response and with depressive cognitive distortions, as measured on the Cognitions Questionnaire, were examined.
RESULTS: Among the 147 completers, 66% responded to treatment (50% reduction of HDRS score). The response rate in patients with low discrepancy scores and in patients with high discrepancy scores were 80.2% and 48.5%, respectively. High BDI-HDRS discrepancy predicted negative response to treatment with odds ratio of 3.79 (95%CI: 1.61-8.93). BDI-HDRS discrepancy was positively associated with depressive cognitive distortions. LIMITATIONS: Potential factors affecting the discrepancy and outcome other than cognitive distortion were not examined in this study.
CONCLUSION: Higher BDI-HDRS discrepancy can predict poorer response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression. The tendency to generalize hopelessness may be a factor influencing the link between the discrepancy and outcome.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar disorder; Chronotherapeutics; Clinical rating scales; Cognitive distortion; Prediction of outcome; Sleep deprivation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27322769     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  4 in total

Review 1.  Circadian Rhythm Dysregulation in Bipolar Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Lauren B Alloy; Tommy H Ng; Madison K Titone; Elaine M Boland
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Bright light therapy in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shengjun Wang; Zhigang Zhang; Li Yao; Nannan Ding; Lingjie Jiang; Yuchen Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  "Shedding Light on Light": A Review on the Effects on Mental Health of Exposure to Optical Radiation.

Authors:  Davide Elia Bertani; Antonella Maria Pia De Novellis; Riccardo Farina; Emanuela Latella; Matteo Meloni; Carmela Scala; Laura Valeo; Gian Maria Galeazzi; Silvia Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hirofumi Hirakawa; Takeshi Terao; Masaaki Muronaga; Nobuyoshi Ishii
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.708

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.