Literature DB >> 27322745

Changes in breathomics from a 1-year randomized smoking cessation trial of electronic cigarettes.

Davide Campagna1,2, Fabio Cibella3, Pasquale Caponnetto1,2, Maria Domenica Amaradio2, Massimo Caruso2, Jaymin B Morjaria4, Mario Malerba5, Riccardo Polosa1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarette (EC) use is an emerging behaviour that has been shown to help smokers to reduce cigarette consumption. The aim of this study was to illustrate long-term changes in exhaled breath measurements and respiratory symptoms in smokers invited to quit or reduce their cigarette consumption by switching to ECs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation of cigarette consumption, fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO), exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and symptom scores was performed in a 1-year randomized, controlled trial of 'healthy' smokers receiving 2·4% nicotine, 1·8% nicotine or no nicotine ECs. FeNO and eCO data are presented on the basis of participants' pooled continuous smoking phenotype classification (failures, reducers and quitters).
RESULTS: A significant effect of quitting classification was found on FeNo and eCO at all time points (P < 0·0001). Among quitters, FeNO (medians and interquartile range) rose from 5·5 (4·5-6·9) ppb to 17·7 (13·3-18·9) ppb by week 52. Baseline eCO (medians and interquartile range) decreased from 17 (12-20) ppm to 3 (1-4) ppm by week 52. No significant changes in FeNO and eCO levels were observed in failures and reducers. Improvements in FeNO and eCO levels were correlated with attenuations in symptom scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Smokers invited to switch to electronic cigarettes who completely abstained from smoking showed steady progressive improvements in their exhaled breath measurements and symptom scores. FeNo and eCO normalization is highly supportive of improved respiratory health outcomes and adds to the notion that quitting from tobacco smoking can reverse harm in the lung.
© 2016 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FeNo; eCO; electronic cigarette; harm reversal; smoking cessation; tobacco harm reduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27322745     DOI: 10.1111/eci.12651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


  24 in total

1.  Reply to "Letter to the Editor: Pulmonary toxicity of electronic cigarettes: more doubts than certainties".

Authors:  Lauren F Chun; Farzad Moazed; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Jeffrey E Gotts
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Not simply the lesser of two evils.

Authors:  S Vamsee Raju; Steven M Rowe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 3.  Electronic cigarettes: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Amika K Sood; Matthew J Kesic; Michelle L Hernandez
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  A Review of Pulmonary Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes in the Context of Smoking: A Focus on Inflammation.

Authors:  Peter G Shields; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; Jo L Freudenheim; Ewy Mathe; Joseph P McElroy; Min-Ae Song; Mark D Wewers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Hayden McRobbie; Ailsa R Butler; Nicola Lindson; Chris Bullen; Rachna Begh; Annika Theodoulou; Caitlin Notley; Nancy A Rigotti; Tari Turner; Thomas R Fanshawe; Peter Hajek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 6.  Neurotoxicity of e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Joanna A Ruszkiewicz; Ziyan Zhang; Filipe Marques Gonçalves; Yousef Tizabi; Judith T Zelikoff; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.023

7.  How do we determine the impact of e-cigarettes on cigarette smoking cessation or reduction? Review and recommendations for answering the research question with scientific rigor.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Shari P Feirman; Raymond S Niaura; Jennifer L Pearson; Allison M Glasser; Lauren K Collins; David B Abrams
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Hayden McRobbie; Nicola Lindson; Chris Bullen; Rachna Begh; Annika Theodoulou; Caitlin Notley; Nancy A Rigotti; Tari Turner; Ailsa R Butler; Thomas R Fanshawe; Peter Hajek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 9.  The chemistry and toxicology of vaping.

Authors:  Emily Bonner; Yvonne Chang; Emerson Christie; Victoria Colvin; Brittany Cunningham; Daniel Elson; Christine Ghetu; Juliana Huizenga; Sara J Hutton; Siva K Kolluri; Stephanie Maggio; Ian Moran; Bethany Parker; Yvonne Rericha; Brianna N Rivera; Samantha Samon; Trever Schwichtenberg; Prarthana Shankar; Michael T Simonich; Lindsay B Wilson; Robyn L Tanguay
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.400

10.  Effects of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes on Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Self-Reported Respiratory Health Outcomes Among Smokers With Psychiatric Conditions or Socioeconomic Disadvantage.

Authors:  Anthony C Oliver; Michael DeSarno; Charles G Irvin; David Kaminsky; Jennifer W Tidey; Stacey C Sigmon; Sarah H Heil; Diann E Gaalema; Dustin Lee; Janice Y Bunn; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Thomas Gallagher; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.