Literature DB >> 27322703

A Pooled Analysis of Biochemical Failure in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) or High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-B) Monotherapy.

John V Hegde1, Sean P Collins2, Donald B Fuller3, Christopher R King1, D Jeffrey Demanes1, Pin-Chieh Wang1, Patrick A Kupelian1, Michael L Steinberg1, Mitchell Kamrava1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) in men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) treated with either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B) monotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 437 patients with intermediate-risk PC treated with SBRT (N=300) or HDR-B (N=137) was performed. Men who underwent SBRT were treated to 35 to 40 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions. A total of 95.6% who underwent HDR-B were treated to 42 Gy in 6 fractions. Baseline patient characteristics were compared using a T test for continuous variables and the Mantel-Haenszel χ metric or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate 5-year actuarial BRFS. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate factors associated with biochemical failure.
RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 68.4 (SD±7.8) years. T-category was T1 in 63.6% and T2 in 36.4%. Mean initial prostate-specific antigen was 7.4 (SD±3.4) ng/mL. Biopsy Gleason score was ≤3+4 in 82.8% and 4+3 in 17.2%. At a median of 4.1 years of follow-up, the BRFS rate (Phoenix definition) was 96.3%, with no difference when stratifying by treatment modality or biologically equivalent dose (BED1.5). On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.08, P=0.04) and biopsy Gleason score (hazard ratio 2.48, P=0.03) were significant predictors of BRFS.
CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up period of 4 years, SBRT and HDR-B monotherapy provide excellent BRFS in intermediate-risk PC. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine the ultimate efficacy of these hypofractionated approaches, but they appear promising relative to standard fractionation outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27322703     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

1.  Prostate-Specific Antigen 5 Years following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Ablative Procedure?

Authors:  Shaan Kataria; Harsha Koneru; Shan Guleria; Malika Danner; Marilyn Ayoob; Thomas Yung; Siyuan Lei; Brian T Collins; Simeng Suy; John H Lynch; Thomas Kole; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gargi Kothari; Andrew Loblaw; Alison C Tree; Nicholas J van As; Drew Moghanaki; Simon S Lo; Piet Ost; Shankar Siva
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

3.  Editorial: The Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Seth R Blacksburg; Donald B Fuller; Jonathan A Haas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Gen Suzuki; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Kei Yamada; Akihisa Ueno; Toru Matsugasumi; Yasuhiro Yamada; Takumi Shiraishi; Atsuko Fujihara; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.