Literature DB >> 27322582

Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Promising Technique in the Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Ahmed H Gabr1, Mohamed F Gabr, Basheer N Elmohamady, Abul-Fotouh Ahmed.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has recently started to be viewed as a promising technology that could be an alternative to different treatment options of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), especially in high-risk patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAE in BPH patients who are at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2013 and February 2015, BPH patients >50 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) refractory to BPH-related medical therapy or had an indwelling urethral catheter due to refractory urine retention were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients were at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia. The PAE was performed and the embolising material used was biosphere 300-500 µm particles. Pre- and 1, 3, 9 months post-intervention, all patients were assessed by detailed medical history, physical examination, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry, and abdominal and transrectal ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 72.50 years and a mean prostate volume of 77.30 ± 14.89 cm3 were included. The PAE procedure was successful in all patients. Throughout the period of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the LUTS and urinary flow rate, and reduction in prostate volume and serum PSA (for all p < 0.001). No major complications were reported.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that BPH patients with failed medical treatment who are at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia could be treated safely and effectively through PAE.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27322582     DOI: 10.1159/000447360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

Review 1.  State of the art of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Mario Petrillo; Filippo Pesapane; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Ilaria Emili; Marzia Acquasanta; Francesca Patella; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Umberto G Rossi; Igor Piacentini; Antonio Maria Granata; Anna Maria Ierardi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04

2.  Prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Malling; M A Røder; K Brasso; J Forman; M Taudorf; L Lönn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  New Ultra-minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Alessandro Veccia; Sabrina De Cillis; Federico Piramide; Gabriele Volpi; Daniele Amparore; Angela Pecoraro; Alberto Piana; Stefano Granato; Paolo Verri; Michele Sica; Juliette Meziere; Beatrice Carbonaro; Stefano Piscitello; Davide Zamengo; Giovanni Cacciamani; Zhamshid Okhunov; Stefano Puliatti; Mark Taratkin; Josè Marenco; Juan Gomez Rivas; Domenico Veneziano; Umberto Carbonara; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Stefano De Luca; Matteo Manfredi; Cristian Fiori; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors.

Authors:  Yao Song; Songqiang Pang; Gongtang Luo; Sen Li; Yaqiang He; Jinqiang Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization on lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Wang; Huan-Tao Zong; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.