Literature DB >> 27322400

Current progress in genetically encoded voltage indicators for neural activity recording.

Shigenori Inagaki1, Takeharu Nagai2.   

Abstract

Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators (GEVIs) are powerful tools used to investigate neural activity in the brain. The spatiotemporal resolution of GEVIs is on a subcellular and millisecond scale, and is superior to that of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG). Further, while patch-clamp techniques record membrane voltage for tens of neurons simultaneously, GEVIs can do so for hundreds of neurons. It is important for neuroscientists to understand the pros and cons of GEVIs and to choose appropriate ones for their specific requirements. Here, we summarize the characteristics of currently available GEVIs based on voltage sensing mechanism and provide a guideline for selecting optimal GEVIs for specific applications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27322400     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  12 in total

1.  Label-free optical detection of action potential in mammalian neurons.

Authors:  Subrata Batabyal; Sarmishtha Satpathy; Loan Bui; Young-Tae Kim; Samarendra Mohanty; Robert Bachoo; Digant P Davé
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Fiber-optic implant for simultaneous fluorescence-based calcium recordings and BOLD fMRI in mice.

Authors:  Felix Schlegel; Yaroslav Sych; Aileen Schroeter; Jillian Stobart; Bruno Weber; Fritjof Helmchen; Markus Rudin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Voltage Imaging: Pitfalls and Potential.

Authors:  Rishikesh U Kulkarni; Evan W Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Visualization of Cellular Electrical Activity in Zebrafish Early Embryos and Tumors.

Authors:  Martin R Silic; GuangJun Zhang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The BioLuminescent-OptoGenetic in vivo response to coelenterazine is proportional, sensitive, and specific in neocortex.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Alexander I More; Nina G Friedman; Ute Hochgeschwender; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Illuminating Brain Activities with Fluorescent Protein-Based Biosensors.

Authors:  Zhijie Chen; Tan M Truong; Hui-Wang Ai
Journal:  Chemosensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-28

7.  Absorption and Emission Spectroscopic Investigation of the Thermal Dynamics of the Archaerhodopsin 3 Based Fluorescent Voltage Sensor QuasAr1.

Authors:  Alfons Penzkofer; Arita Silapetere; Peter Hegemann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms of coupling to voltage sensors in voltage-evoked cellular signals.

Authors:  Yasushi Okamura; Yoshifumi Okochi
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.493

9.  Comparative Evaluation of Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators.

Authors:  Yuki Bando; Masayuki Sakamoto; Samuel Kim; Inbal Ayzenshtat; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  In Vitro Testing of Voltage Indicators: Archon1, ArcLightD, ASAP1, ASAP2s, ASAP3b, Bongwoori-Pos6, BeRST1, FlicR1, and Chi-VSFP-Butterfly.

Authors:  Milena M Milosevic; Jinyoung Jang; Eric J McKimm; Mei Hong Zhu; Srdjan D Antic
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.