| Literature DB >> 27322227 |
Ali Ghasemzadeh1, Hawa Z E Jaafar2, Asmah Rahmat3.
Abstract
The effects of different drying methods (freeze drying, vacuum oven drying, and shade drying) on the phytochemical constituents associated with the antioxidant activities of Z. officinale var. rubrum Theilade were evaluated to determine the optimal drying process for these rhizomes. Total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity were measured using the spectrophotometric method. Individual phenolic acids and flavonoids, 6- and 8-gingerol and shogaol were identified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography method. Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays were used for the evaluation of antioxidant activities. The highest reduction in moisture content was observed after freeze drying (82.97%), followed by vacuum oven drying (80.43%) and shade drying (72.65%). The highest TPC, TFC, and 6- and 8-shogaol contents were observed in samples dried by the vacuum oven drying method compared to other drying methods. The highest content of 6- and 8-gingerol was observed after freeze drying, followed by vacuum oven drying and shade drying methods. Fresh samples had the highest PPO activity and lowest content of flavonoid and phenolic acid compounds compared to dried samples. Rhizomes dried by the vacuum oven drying method represent the highest DPPH (52.9%) and FRAP activities (566.5 μM of Fe (II)/g DM), followed by freeze drying (48.3% and 527.1 μM of Fe (II)/g DM, respectively) and shade drying methods (37.64% and 471.8 μM of Fe (II)/g DM, respectively) with IC50 values of 27.2, 29.1, and 34.8 μg/mL, respectively. Negative and significant correlations were observed between PPO and antioxidant activity of rhizomes. Vacuum oven dried rhizomes can be utilized as an ingredient for the development of value-added food products as they contain high contents of phytochemicals with valuable antioxidant potential.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH activity; FRAP activity; Zingiber officinale var. rubrum Theilade; phytochemicals; polyphenol oxidase; storage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27322227 PMCID: PMC6273533 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21060780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of different drying methods on moisture loss in Z. officinale var. rubrum Theilade. Bars represent standard error of the means.
Effect of different drying methods on TPC, TFC, 6- and 8-gingerol and shogaol content.
| Drying Method | TPC | TFC | 6-gingerol | 8-gingerol | 6-shogaol | 8-shogaol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg GAE/g DM) | (mg QE/g DM) | (mg/g DM) | (mg/g DM) | (mg/g DM) | (mg/g DM) | |
| Shade drying | 10.77 ± 2.37 c | 4.93 ± 0.64 c | 3.79 ± 0.52 c | 2.84 ± 0.31 b | 4.21 ± 0.36 c | 3.80 ± 0.27 c |
| Vacuum oven drying | 18.44 ± 3.44 a | 8.27 ± 0.81 a | 4.61 ± 0.41 b | 3.42 ± 0.28 a | 7.49 ± 0.62 a | 5.73 ± 0.41 a |
| Freeze drying | 13.49 ± 2.07 b | 6.44 ± 0.56 b | 5.82 ± 0.48 a | 3.58 ± 0.41 a | 4.66 ± 0.36 b | 4.19 ± 0.30 b |
| Fresh | 7.58 ± 0.84 d | 3.65 ± 0.47 d | 3.14 ± 0.32 d | 2.50 ± 0.17 b | 2.20 ± 0.21 d | 2.12 ± 0.14 d |
Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Effect of different drying methods on individual flavonoids and phenolic acids content identified from Z. officinale var. rubrum rhizome extract.
| Drying Method | Epicatechin | Catechin | Kaempferol | Quercetin | Rutin | Gallic Acid | Ferulic Acid | Cinnamic Acid | Tannic Acid | Syringic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shade drying | 0.323 ± 0.027 c | 0.643 ± 0.062 c | 0.931 ± 0.077 c | 0.993 ± 0.079 c | 0.471 ± 0.037 c | 0.386 ± 0.024 b | 0.252 ± 0.012 c | 0.174 ± 0.012 c | 0.271 ± 0.010 c | 0.120 ± 0.008 c |
| Vacuum oven drying | 0.397 ± 0.033 a | 0.829 ± 0.059 a | 1.091 ± 0.064 b | 1.391 ± 0.092 a | 0.586 ± 0.049 a | 0.442 ± 0.045 a | 0.393 ± 0.019 a | 0.322 ± 0.026 a | 0.319 ± 0.030 b | 0.201 ± 0.012 b |
| Freeze drying | 0.355 ± 0.031 b | 0.742 ± 0.061 b | 1.204 ± 0.095 a | 1.281 ± 0.088 b | 0.513 ± 0.041 b | 0.441 ± 0.036 a | 0.327 ± 0.024 b | 0.214 ± 0.019 b | 0.348 ± 0.029 a | 0.228 ± 0.016 a |
| Fresh | 0.211 ± 0.037 d | 0.517 ± 0.067 d | 0.72 ± 0.058 d | 0.527 ± 0.048 d | 0.257 ± 0.037 d | 0.211 ± 0.017 c | 0.167 ± 0.011 d | ND | 0.147 ± 0.011 d | ND |
Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at p < 0.05. ND: not detected. Unit: mg/g DM.
Antioxidant activities of Z. officinale var. rubrum Theilade rhizome dried with different methods.
| Drying Methods and Positive Controls | DPPH (%) | FRAP (μM of Fe (II)/g) | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shade drying | 37.64 ± 2.44 e | 471.8 ± 18.27 e | 34.8 ± 1.27 b |
| Vacuum oven drying | 52.9 ± 3.78 c | 566.5 ± 21.60 c | 27.2 ± 1.19 d |
| Freeze drying | 48.3 ± 3.17 d | 527.1 ± 20.47 d | 29.1 ± 1.44 c |
| Fresh | 22.5 ± 2.58 f | 348.8 ± 16.42 f | 42.5 ± 1.62 a |
| Quercetin | 82.46 ± 4.29 a | 890.4 ± 24.16 a | 15.9 ± 1.07 f |
| Gallic acid | 68.71 ± 4.11 b | 647.1 ± 22.18 b | 24.3 ± 1.19 e |
Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of different drying methods on PPO activity in Z. officinale var. rubrum Theilade. Bars represent standard error of the means.
Correlation analysis between identified phytochemicals and PPO activity with antioxidant activities of Z. officinale var. rubrum Theilade.
| Phytochemicals | DPPH | FRAP |
|---|---|---|
| 6-gingerol | 0.914 ** | 0.886 ** |
| 8-gingerol | 0.906 ** | 0.894 ** |
| 6-shogaol | 0.921 ** | 0.942 ** |
| 8-shogaol | 0.813 ** | 0.944 ** |
| Quercetin | 0.940 ** | 0.916 ** |
| Rutin | 0.730 * | 0.815 ** |
| Catechin | 0.872 ** | 0.783 * |
| Epicatechin | 0.786 * | 0.772 * |
| Kaempferol | 0.882 ** | 0.847 ** |
| Gallic acid | 0.847 ** | 0.844 ** |
| Tannic acid | 0.752 * | 0.811 ** |
| Cinnamic acid | 0.829 ** | 0.766 * |
| Ferulic acid | 0.820 ** | 0.759 * |
| Syringic acid | 0.773 * | 0.741 * |
| PPO activity | −0.911 ** | −0.884 ** |
* and ** represent significant at p < 0.05 and 0.01 percent respectively.